[XFree86] Problems setting up Xinerama...
I have included my 'XF86Config', I have a Matrox G400 Dual head...(maybe today will be my lucky day ;) ). # Section "Module" Load"dbe" # Double buffer extension SubSection "extmod" Option"omit xfree86-dga" # don't initialise the DGA extension EndSubSection Load"type1" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load "glx" # LOad "dri" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier"Keyboard1" Driver"Keyboard" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier"Mouse1" Driver"mouse" Option "Protocol""IMPS/2" #Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" # Option "Device" "/dev/ttyS0" # Option "Device" "/dev/ttyS1" Option "Buttons" "5" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "My Monitor0" horizsync 31.5 - 50.0 VertRefresh 40-90 EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "My Monitor1" horizsync31.5 - 54 VertRefresh 50-120 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "VESA Framebuffer0" Driver "mga" VendorName "Matrox" BoardName "MGA G400 AGP" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Screen 0 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "VESA Framebuffer1" Driver "mga" VendorName "Matrox" BoardName "MGA G400 AGP" BusID"PCI:1:0:0" Screen 1 EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen 0" Device "VESA Framebuffer0" Monitor "My Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 Subsection "Display" Depth 8 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" Virtual 1024 768 EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 16 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 32 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen 1" Device "VESA Framebuffer1" Monitor "My Monitor1" DefaultDepth 24 Subsection "Display" Depth 8 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" Virtual 1024 768 EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 16 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 32 Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubsection EndSection Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "layout1" Screen "Screen 0" Screen "Screen 1" LeftOf "Screen 0" Option "Xinerama" "on" InputDevice "Mouse1" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard1" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection ### Output of 'lspci ###' [EnGlow][root][12:38:13][~][#] lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2570 (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2571 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d2 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d4 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d7 (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24dd (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB PCI Bridge (rev c2) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d0 (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24db (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d3 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d5 (rev 02) 00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d6 (rev 02) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 05) 02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1050 (rev 02) 02:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): NEC Corporation: Unknown device 00f2 (rev 01) [EnGlow][root][12:38:15][~][#] # Thanks for any input. :-) Stratis ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] ENQUIRY
Sir, In the GNOME- Window Manager capplet of RedHat Linux 7, I added a new window manager with the command fvwm2 and gave the configuration command xterm -e"pico-w.fvwm2rc" and i got my window manager by clicking the ok button. The problem is task bar and the panel-menu is not displayed. 1.)How to get back to default window manager? Thank you Sincerely, Nishith Yahoo! India Insurance Special: Be informed on the best policies, services, tools and more.
Re: [XFree86] Stuck at very low resolution
We need to see the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file. Mark. On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mark wrote: > Hi. I am helping a friend install and configure XFree86 on FreeBSD. He > had it working with his existing hardware, and then he wanted to > reinstall FreeBSD on his new hard drive. > > Once we got FreeBSD and XFree86 all installed and operational, we tried > configuring it. In all config options, its set to 1024x768, but when he > runs it, everything is VERY large on the screen... > > We've tried deleting and re-adding the config files with xf86cfg and > xf86cfg -textmode, and by adding the mode section to the config file > manually with still no luck. He has an on-board video card. > > This is XFree86 Version 4.3.0 on FreeBSD 4.9. > > Any suggestions on how we can proceed in getting this configured? > > Thanks a lot > > -Mark > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 > ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Stuck at very low resolution
Hi. I am helping a friend install and configure XFree86 on FreeBSD. He had it working with his existing hardware, and then he wanted to reinstall FreeBSD on his new hard drive. Once we got FreeBSD and XFree86 all installed and operational, we tried configuring it. In all config options, its set to 1024x768, but when he runs it, everything is VERY large on the screen... We've tried deleting and re-adding the config files with xf86cfg and xf86cfg -textmode, and by adding the mode section to the config file manually with still no luck. He has an on-board video card. This is XFree86 Version 4.3.0 on FreeBSD 4.9. Any suggestions on how we can proceed in getting this configured? Thanks a lot -Mark ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] 64bit XFree86 for ppc64 Linux?
Hello All, I have a ppc64 sytem with Debian woody. I have updated my kerenl with 2.6.3. Debian provides only 32 bit ppc port. So my xserver seems to be slow in 32 bit. I would like to build 64 bit XFree86 from the latest source (4.4). I have a 64 bit toolchain. But I have only 32 bit xlibs and other dependent libraries. Is there any way to build 64 bit XFree86 for my system. Is there any patch for this? Thanks in advace. Regards, Mahesh
[XFree86] Re [11]
try to understand in 1927 Tomb Raider Could I speak to... Sims
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
Måns Rullgård wrote: > I must have missed that, and I thought Gentoo looked like a > reasonable distribution. I guess I'll just stay with > Slackware if they are the only ones that base choices on the > usefulness of software rather than personal opinions about > the licenses. Exactly. It's just a bunch of text files, Python scripts, or whatever, so what's the problem in providing them, even if as as second choice ? None. BTW, Slackware also includes Java. Patrick got a license from SUN a long time ago. > Am I the only one who remembers when distributions used to > include Netscape Navigator? I bet they'd still if Mozilla didn't exist. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
At 10:58 PM 3/2/2004 +0100, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 03/02/04 21:54, David Dawes wrote: > The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the > source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from > the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their > freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." IMHO this is not the point: even ATM you can run XFree86 w/o your vendor's "approval", you have just to grab the sources and compile them by yourself. And you're in completeley *freedom* do to that, AFAIK with all the distributions, as no one forces you to use Debian|RedHat|Mandrake|* packages in place of sources. But I think that in theory a distribution maintainer for XFree86 should know XFree86 on that distribution better than any other XFree86 developer, so he's the first address for any problem which could be specific to that distribution. And IMHO this is surely a real added value. On the other hand, even if XFree86 provides different package formats, how can you be sure that they will be completely integrated in the different distributions? I mean, about dependencies, platforms, libraries and so on... If I install the XFree86 4.4.0 package on my Debian and some other software installed don't work anymore because some conflicts? Should I manually compile the non-working softwares or the XFree86 itself? Again, IMHO this is a distribution-specific work, not an XFree86 one. well if that's true this list gets a lot, a helluva lot, of distro specific questions. personally i think that says a lot, a helluva lot, about the quality. mark. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
At 03:54 PM 3/2/2004 -0500, you wrote: On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:06:19PM +0100, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: >Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:49 schrieb Måns Rullgård: >> Frédéric L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: >> >>> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries >> >>> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or >> >>> compile it. >> >> >> >> You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on >> >> shipping 4.4.0? ;o) >> > >> > Actually, according to >> > ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT >> > , I guess Slackware will: >> >> I suppose Gentoo won't have any problems either, since they are not >> actually shipping the files. Besides, I don't think they have any >> silly political reasons stopping them. > >Gentoo announced, that it will not supply ebuilds for XFree86 with the new >license. There's actually a long disussion in gentoo-user mailing list about >this. I'm going to write my own ebuild now. Imho the only reason for gentoo >doing this, is a political one :-( The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." There seems to be something of a trend away from major vendors providing support, and thus real added value, for individual users anyway. well i was thinking of making sun sparc tarballs. i could upload them somewhere if so. mark. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
Michael Schreckenbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:49 schrieb Måns Rullgård: >> Frédéric L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: >> >>> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries >> >>> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or >> >>> compile it. >> >> >> >> You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on >> >> shipping 4.4.0? ;o) >> > >> > Actually, according to >> > ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT >> > , I guess Slackware will: >> >> I suppose Gentoo won't have any problems either, since they are not >> actually shipping the files. Besides, I don't think they have any >> silly political reasons stopping them. > > Gentoo announced, that it will not supply ebuilds for XFree86 with the new > license. There's actually a long disussion in gentoo-user mailing list about > this. I'm going to write my own ebuild now. Would you mind posting your ebuild somewhere so others can use it? > Imho the only reason for gentoo doing this, is a political one :-( I must have missed that, and I thought Gentoo looked like a reasonable distribution. I guess I'll just stay with Slackware if they are the only ones that base choices on the usefulness of software rather than personal opinions about the licenses. Am I the only one who remembers when distributions used to include Netscape Navigator? -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] X-Server failure for Red Hat 9
Hope my problem could be resolved. Thank you XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.3.0-2) Release Date: 27 February 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.20-3bigmem i686 [ELF] Build Date: 27 February 2003 Build Host: porky.devel.redhat.com Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.4.20-8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)) #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed Mar 3 10:42:15 2004 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (==) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Videocard0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" (**) XKB: model: "pc105" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" (**) XKB: layout: "us" (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |-->Input Device "DevInputMice" (**) FontPath set to "unix/:7100" (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (II) Open APM successful (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8060, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,0691 card , rev 01 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,8598 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 1106,0586 card 1106, rev 47 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:07:1: chip 1106,0571 card , rev 06 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:07:2: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:07:3: chip 1106,3040 card , rev 10 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 10ec,8029 card 10ec,8029 rev 00 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,002d card , rev 15 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x000c (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xdc00 - 0xddff (0x200) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xde00 - 0xdfff (0x200) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:7:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:7:3), (-1,-1,1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus -1 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus -1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus -1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) nVidia Corporation NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro] rev 21, Mem @ 0xdc00/24, 0xde00/25 (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] [1] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) OS-reported resource ranges: [0] -1 0 0xffe0 - 0x (0x20) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0 0x0010 - 0x3fff (0x3ff0) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0 0x000f - 0x000f (0x1) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x000c - 0x000e (0x3) MX[B] [4] -1 0 0x - 0x0009 (0xa) MX[B] [5] -1 0 0x -
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 16:26, David Dawes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:58:58PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Hello, > > > >on 03/02/04 21:54, David Dawes wrote: > >> The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the > >> source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from > >> the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their > >> freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." Thank you. > >IMHO this is not the point: even ATM you can run XFree86 w/o your vendor's > >"approval", you have just to grab the sources and compile them by yourself. And > >you're in completeley *freedom* do to that, AFAIK with all the distributions, as > >no one forces you to use Debian|RedHat|Mandrake|* packages in place of sources. > >But I think that in theory a distribution maintainer for XFree86 should know > >XFree86 on that distribution better than any other XFree86 developer, so he's > >the first address for any problem which could be specific to that distribution. > >And IMHO this is surely a real added value. > > > >On the other hand, even if XFree86 provides different package formats, how can > >you be sure that they will be completely integrated in the different > >distributions? I mean, about dependencies, platforms, libraries and so on... If > >I install the XFree86 4.4.0 package on my Debian and some other software > >installed don't work anymore because some conflicts? Should I manually compile > >the non-working softwares or the XFree86 itself? Again, IMHO this is a > >distribution-specific work, not an XFree86 one. > > Everyone can make their own choice. I am interested in providing > more choices. > > I also want to let everyone here know that XFree86 is committed to > providing our software to the general public, with or without the > cooperation of the distributions. Unless a Debian Developer specifies that a packagage requires "xserver-common (< 4.4)", which would royally steam me Also, you'd have to match how each major distro packages XFree86. Tossing it all, for example, into xfree86.deb would break everything that depends on it. -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA All of the "reporting" about Laci Peterson & Michael Jackson reminds me of the Don Henley song "Dirty Laundry": "Can we do the operation? Is the head dead yet? You know, the boys in the newsroom got a running bet. Get the widow on the set, we need dirty laundry." ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] linux on laptop
I use a Compaq at work with Intel 845 (or something like) and under Windows you can have 1152x864 but X claims the card doesn't support it !! So assuming the XF86Config file is correct then maybe X simply does not support that resolution on that card. Anyway XF86Config (the Red Hat and Mandrake one is in /etc/X11) should have something like the following in it (probably better to use whatever X configuration utility comes with your distribution): Section "Monitor" Identifier "monitor1" VendorName "Generic" ModelName "1280x1024 @ 74 Hz" HorizSync 31.5-79.0 VertRefresh 50-90 # A mode line can be used to try find a mode / resolution setup that X can # work with if the auto mode selection does not work #ModeLine "1280x1024" 108.00 1280 1328 1440 1624 1024 1025 1028 1048 +hsync +vsync # Sony Vaio C1(X,XS,VE,VN)? # 1024x480 @ 85.6 Hz, 48 kHz hsync # ModeLine "1024x480"65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync -vsync # TV fullscreen mode or DVD fullscreen output. # 768x576 @ 79 Hz, 50 kHz hsync #ModeLine "768x576" 50.00 768 832 846 1000 576 590 595 630 # 768x576 @ 100 Hz, 61.6 kHz hsync #ModeLine "768x576" 63.07 768 800 960 1024 576 578 590 616 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "device1" BoardName "ATI Rage Mobility P" Driver "ati" # Option "crt_screen" Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "screen1" Device "device1" Monitor "monitor1" DefaultColorDepth 16 Subsection "Display" Depth 16 Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" EndSubsection Subsection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" "1152x864" "1024x768" EndSubsection EndSection Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "layout1" InputDevice "Keyboard1" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice "Mouse1" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Mouse2" "SendCoreEvents" Screen "screen1" EndSection Hope this helps, Owen On Tuesday 02 Mar 2004 17:20, Lucia Ballerini wrote: > Hello! > I've a Sony VAIO TR3A (intel 855GM) and I installed Red Hat 9.0 > I'm wondering how to get the resolution of 1280x768? > > Thank you! > Lucia > --*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-- > Lucia Ballerini, Ph.D. > Dept. of Technology, Örebro University, Sweden > > Mailing address: > Centre for Image Analysis tel: + 46 18 4717849 > Lägerhyddvägen 3 fax: + 46 18 553447 > 75237 Uppsala, Sweden > --*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-- > > > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:58:58PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Hello, > >on 03/02/04 21:54, David Dawes wrote: >> The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the >> source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from >> the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their >> freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." >IMHO this is not the point: even ATM you can run XFree86 w/o your vendor's >"approval", you have just to grab the sources and compile them by yourself. And >you're in completeley *freedom* do to that, AFAIK with all the distributions, as >no one forces you to use Debian|RedHat|Mandrake|* packages in place of sources. >But I think that in theory a distribution maintainer for XFree86 should know >XFree86 on that distribution better than any other XFree86 developer, so he's >the first address for any problem which could be specific to that distribution. >And IMHO this is surely a real added value. > >On the other hand, even if XFree86 provides different package formats, how can >you be sure that they will be completely integrated in the different >distributions? I mean, about dependencies, platforms, libraries and so on... If >I install the XFree86 4.4.0 package on my Debian and some other software >installed don't work anymore because some conflicts? Should I manually compile >the non-working softwares or the XFree86 itself? Again, IMHO this is a >distribution-specific work, not an XFree86 one. Everyone can make their own choice. I am interested in providing more choices. I also want to let everyone here know that XFree86 is committed to providing our software to the general public, with or without the cooperation of the distributions. David ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1, i810.o unresolved errors
Hello all, A member of the SuSE xfree86 mailinglist came with a problem after having installed a new version of XFree86: 4.3.0.1: Symbol drmCtlUninstHandler from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmCtlUninstHandler from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved! Does anyone know how to solve this issue? He can't get his resolution to show up with anything other than 60 Hz. Regards, Pieter Hulshoff ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] asdf
asdf
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 03/02/04 21:54, David Dawes wrote: > The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the > source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from > the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their > freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." IMHO this is not the point: even ATM you can run XFree86 w/o your vendor's "approval", you have just to grab the sources and compile them by yourself. And you're in completeley *freedom* do to that, AFAIK with all the distributions, as no one forces you to use Debian|RedHat|Mandrake|* packages in place of sources. But I think that in theory a distribution maintainer for XFree86 should know XFree86 on that distribution better than any other XFree86 developer, so he's the first address for any problem which could be specific to that distribution. And IMHO this is surely a real added value. On the other hand, even if XFree86 provides different package formats, how can you be sure that they will be completely integrated in the different distributions? I mean, about dependencies, platforms, libraries and so on... If I install the XFree86 4.4.0 package on my Debian and some other software installed don't work anymore because some conflicts? Should I manually compile the non-working softwares or the XFree86 itself? Again, IMHO this is a distribution-specific work, not an XFree86 one. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFARQOhVAp7Xm10JmkRAhgCAJ0Wg2RPT6elVviTXO0URp1yPG+njgCdHqa3 /qIuJ4kZq6h2N/zI/LEMvEQ= =NKoq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] help needed
ive posted to a forum and i'll include the responses ive had as well, please try and help me, i dont know how this [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail thing works so heres my email address so i can get responses - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- my original post -- ok, first to give you background info -i have a dell latitude C600, 256MB ram, 20Gig HDD, P3 1GHz-primary partition with winxp pro installed,-primary partition created for linux (ext2)-primary partition created for linux swap file-logical partition created for linux ' \boot '-3x logicals for documents, temp, and zipped setup files (all for windows)i am currently having problems with winxp (blue screen of death problem) that i cant fix -see tweakxp.com forum (search for UniShieldXP.sys - there will only be one thread containg that) if you would like to seehere goes...first of all, i can only have a certain number of primary partitions, one must be winxp, then theres linux, linux swap and linux \boot to choose from, which should be primary, should i reformat and try installing linux first to make sure the \boot is the first thing on the disk and to maybe cure any problems with linux i am having?should i use ext3 for the actual linux partition?i have just spent a heck of a long downloading the three disk iso's for redhat linux 9 and have burnt them to diski started the install process, it detects my graphics card as 'ATI rage 128 mobility' and my monitor as 'unknown'i dont have to go into text mode, however the setup window is not full screenthe install goes fine at firstchecking partitionsi create the partitons before hand-the first time i did the partition bit i selected the check for errors box for just the one partiton it was to install on, it found errors on it, (note: i did not make \boot until the third try!)-the second time i didnt check for errors-before doing the third time i deleted the linux partitons in windows (using partiton magic 8) and remade them and also made one for \boot (logical), i then checked all three partitions and found only the \boot had errors-forth time i checked only the first two (linux & swap) and found no errors on themi will try doing previous stuff again to try and rid \boot of errors (the partitions i had made before which i then remade are now apparently fine, the one i have just made is not fine, do you think i should delete all partitons and install linux first, formatting the entire drive with a linux format (ext2/ext3) and then install windows after and see if all my problems are solved by doing that?)selecting monitorwhen i got to the stage where you select the monitor-the first time i had a quick look on the net and i think its a 1024x768 dell laptop model, which i selected from the list-the second time i left it as unknown-the third time i skipped the x setup bitwhat happens is this - it reboots and should get to a setup where you create user accounts and such but it doesntintsead it scrolls through lots of text, the last i think says 'starting first run' or something (the first time i load linux and i think its trying to get to that setup bit)it then just gives me some logon text, i logon as the root account and type startx (have tried making a user account from here and trying startx but same prob) but it doesnt work, i get an erroralso, while im logging in, it flashes black then back to the text a few times before giving a blue box with just two options -yes and no/cancel, with no description or anything, clicking no brings up another, then again - just yes, then back to logon. click yes on the first one and it scrolls through two paragraphs of text and then a sentence with my graphics card mentioned but ends up not being able to do whatever it was tryingthe error message after logon & typing startx:SHARP LQ141F1LH02Color, Single, TFT(EE) R128(0) : Virtual height (0) is too small for the hardware (min 128)(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configurationFatal server error:no screens foundXIO: fatal error 104 (connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0" after 0 requests (0 unknown processed) with 0 events remaining[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#please help me if you can make sense of any of this, im a total newbie to linux and i cant even get it to install -- reply by the other person -- You need to check your XF86Config file [this command should do it, vi /etc/X11/XF86Config google for vi commands if you are unsure how to use that editor] and make sure these sections I list are the same; I wrote:
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:06:19PM +0100, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: >Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:49 schrieb Måns Rullgård: >> Frédéric L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: >> >>> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries >> >>> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or >> >>> compile it. >> >> >> >> You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on >> >> shipping 4.4.0? ;o) >> > >> > Actually, according to >> > ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT >> > , I guess Slackware will: >> >> I suppose Gentoo won't have any problems either, since they are not >> actually shipping the files. Besides, I don't think they have any >> silly political reasons stopping them. > >Gentoo announced, that it will not supply ebuilds for XFree86 with the new >license. There's actually a long disussion in gentoo-user mailing list about >this. I'm going to write my own ebuild now. Imho the only reason for gentoo >doing this, is a political one :-( The answer is to bypass the middle man and go straight to the source. I'd like to see a range of package formats available from the XFree86 ftp site so that people can more easily exercise their freedom to run what they want without their vendor's "approval." There seems to be something of a trend away from major vendors providing support, and thus real added value, for individual users anyway. David ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] re [5]
don't go Where shall It takes me only the blackout Small world!
[XFree86] re [18]:
Will you Diablo 2 going to into account Snowboarding
Re: [XFree86] Radeon 9600 pro All-in-Wonder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 03/02/04 19:42, Dave Korb wrote: > Has anyone tested the 4.4.0 release with the Radeon 9600 pro > All-in-Wonder card. I had heard rumors that the All-in-Wonder cards had > a different chipset than the regular 9600 series, but I cannot confirm > this. Does anyone know what the chipset is and are all 9600's the same. please take a look at http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ATI http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ATIRadeon http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/radeon.4.html http://www.ati.com/support/faq/linux.html http://www.ati.com/support/driver.html BTW, this is the log from my XFree86, I've an ATI Radeon Mobility (M10) NP (AGP) on an ASUS M6842NWH laptop: = (II) ATI: ATI driver (version 6.5.3) for chipsets: ati, ativga (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets: ATI Radeon QD (AGP), ATI Radeon QE (AGP), ATI Radeon QF (AGP), ATI Radeon QG (AGP), ATI Radeon VE/7000 QY (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon VE/7000 QZ (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon Mobility M7 LW (AGP), ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 M7 LX (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LY (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LZ (AGP), ATI Radeon IGP320 (A3) 4136, ATI Radeon IGP320M (U1) 4336, ATI Radeon IGP330/340/350 (A4) 4137, ATI Radeon IGP330M/340M/350M (U2) 4337, ATI Radeon 7000 IGP (A4+) 4237, ATI Radeon Mobility 7000 IGP 4437, ATI FireGL 8700/8800 QH (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 QL (AGP), ATI Radeon 9100 QM (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 AIW BB (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 AIW BC (AGP), ATI Radeon 7500 QW (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 7500 QX (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 9000/PRO If (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 9000 Ig (AGP/PCI), ATI FireGL Mobility 9000 (M9) Ld (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (M9) Lf (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (M9) Lg (AGP), ATI Radeon 9100 IGP (A5) 5834, ATI Radeon Mobility 9100 IGP (U3) 5835, ATI Radeon 9200PRO 5960 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200 5962 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200SE 5964 (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C61 (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C63 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9500 AD (AGP), ATI Radeon 9500 AE (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600TX AF (AGP), ATI FireGL Z1 AG (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700 Pro ND (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700/9500Pro NE (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700 NF (AGP), ATI FireGL X1 NG (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600 AP (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600SE AQ (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600XT AR (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600 AS (AGP), ATI FireGL T2 AT (AGP), ATI FireGL RV360 AV (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M10) NP (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M10) NQ (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M11) NR (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M10) NS (AGP), ATI FireGL Mobility T2 (M10) NT (AGP), ATI FireGL Mobility T2 (M11) NV (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800SE AH (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 AI (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 AJ (AGP), ATI FireGL X2 AK (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800PRO NH (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 NI (AGP), ATI FireGL X2 NK (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800XT NJ (AGP) = I can use the external CRT (Clone and DualHead 1400x1050-1600x1200) with no problems using the OpenSource 'radeon' driver. I haven't made yet a lot of tests with the proprietary ATI 'fglrx' driver. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAROIRVAp7Xm10JmkRAiZDAKCHYH3vpRBodnVZv128oAC37cTfqACcCkH3 k5lfUORXhuHyijiJvMPmEtA= =j+OQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Radeon 9600 pro All-in-Wonder
Has anyone tested the 4.4.0 release with the Radeon 9600 pro All-in-Wonder card. I had heard rumors that the All-in-Wonder cards had a different chipset than the regular 9600 series, but I cannot confirm this. Does anyone know what the chipset is and are all 9600's the same. Thanks, Dave Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:49 schrieb Måns Rullgård: > Frédéric L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >>> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries > >>> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or > >>> compile it. > >> > >> You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on > >> shipping 4.4.0? ;o) > > > > Actually, according to > > ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT > > , I guess Slackware will: > > I suppose Gentoo won't have any problems either, since they are not > actually shipping the files. Besides, I don't think they have any > silly political reasons stopping them. Gentoo announced, that it will not supply ebuilds for XFree86 with the new license. There's actually a long disussion in gentoo-user mailing list about this. I'm going to write my own ebuild now. Imho the only reason for gentoo doing this, is a political one :-( Michael ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Ati rage 128, font problem
Hello I installed Suse 9 (mandrake 9.2, 9.1) and by starting KDE or GNOME my fonts were huge. I found, that the config files for setting the size of fonts are in /home/user/.kde/share/config... / kdeglobals. There were the sizes of fonts normal (about 10-13). But after restarting X it was the same. That was on my computer, where i have ati rage xpert 99 (or 2000) wiht 16MB memory. Then i took the same linux installation from friends PC, where he had An 3dfx velocity 100, (and his linux was going well). I run his system on my pc, Yast recognized my new hardware (graphic card...) and set it. After that KDE started and the fonts were again huge (size about 50- 100) I found out, that on mandrake 9.1 (dont know what version of Xfree is there), but there were not all font huge, just in some programs, like Openoffice... Could you please help mi, how can i solve this problem? thanks a lot peter --- reklama - Viete, Äo VÃs dnes ÄakÃ? Pozrite si Horoskop. http://horoskop.zoznam.sk ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] linux on laptop
Hello! I've a Sony VAIO TR3A (intel 855GM) and I installed Red Hat 9.0 I'm wondering how to get the resolution of 1280x768? Thank you! Lucia --*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-- Lucia Ballerini, Ph.D. Dept. of Technology, Örebro University, Sweden Mailing address: Centre for Image Analysis tel: + 46 18 4717849 Lägerhyddvägen 3fax: + 46 18 553447 75237 Uppsala, Sweden --*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
Frédéric L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >>> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries >>> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or >>> compile it. > >> You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on >> shipping 4.4.0? ;o) > > Actually, according to > ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT > , I guess Slackware will: I suppose Gentoo won't have any problems either, since they are not actually shipping the files. Besides, I don't think they have any silly political reasons stopping them. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] problem loggin in using graphic mode
Gillian Lim wrote: > I have to reboot my pc and change to boot from level 3 which is > successful. but when i try to change to graphic mode again using either > X, startx or telinit 5, it will goes into a blank screen. I have > attached the log file for your reference. Please advise. Excerpt from your XFree86.0.log file: Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list! Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' This indicates the problem is that it cannot connect to your X Font Server (xfs). Restart your xfs (/sbin/service xfs restart) and should be fine. This service should start with runlevel 5 (Red Hat Linux's default run level for graphic login). You can check that with 'chkconfig --list xfs', and make any necessary changes with 'ntsysv'. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] X starts slowly on C&T F68554
Hi all, it takes about 10 sec for X to startup (on a notebook 266MHz Pentium MMX). After startx, X switches to graphic mode and then the screen is dark for about 10 sec and then the background appears and the window manager comes up normally. There is a similar efect also when switching back from console. I experienced no problems after init. The server works nicely. The XFree86.0.log is error-free, it has a warning about missing /dev/apm_bios and MTRR's, which I suppose is not the problem (?) This leaves with no clue what else to check, where to look. Any suggestions ? Thanks a lot, Robert data: XFree86 ver 4.3.0.1, compiled for linux 2.4.20 on pentium-MMX card: Chips and Technologies F68554 HiQVision This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 Release Date: 9 May 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.20 i686 [ELF] Build Date: 06 February 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Feb 22 14:29:23 2004 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (==) ServerLayout "XFree86 Configured" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Card0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "fi" (**) XKB: layout: "fi" (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) FontPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such file or directory) (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1022,700e card , rev 13 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1022,700f card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 1106,0686 card 147b,a702 rev 40 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:07:1: chip 1106,0571 card 1106,0571 rev 06 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:07:2: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 1a class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:07:3: chip 1106,3038 card 0925,1234 rev 1a class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:07:4: chip 1106,3057 card 1106,3057 rev 40 class 0c,05,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 10b7,1000 rev 74 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:0d:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 10b7,1000 rev 74 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 1274,5000 card 4942,4c4c rev 01 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:05:0: chip 102b,0525 card 102b,0641 rev 85 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x000e (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xf600 - 0xf8ff (0x300) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xf400 - 0xf5ff (0x200) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:7:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_
Re: [XFree86] Security issues fixed in XFree86 4.4.0 ?
Lise Moorveld wrote: > Just a quick question. On the XFree86 Security page > http://www.xfree86.org/security there are three security issues that > have apparently been fixed in release candidate 4.3.99.903. However, in > the release notes of 4.4.0 http://www.xfree86.org/4.4.0/RELNOTES.html > there is no mention of these issues. > > I am assuming that these issues are fixed in 4.4.0 but I need to be > sure. Can anyone confirm this? Yes, the 4.4.0 release is based upon the 4.3.99.903 pre-release, so all security fixes included in it will be in the new release. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Re: Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: >> As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries >> from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or >> compile it. > You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on > shipping 4.4.0? ;o) Actually, according to ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/COPYRIGHT.TXT , I guess Slackware will: "This product includes software developed by The XFree86 Project, Inc (http://www.xfree86.org/) and its contributors." -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Radeon 9200: DRI on one head and 2d on second head ?
Is there any driver for Radeon 9600XT fo XWindows? When I try to set up radeon driver in X configuration it freezes. Autodetect detects vesa driver. Thank you for your help. Ales - Original Message - From: "Alex Deucher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: [XFree86] Radeon 9200: DRI on one head and 2d on second head ? > -- > > > >Hello > > > >I'm trying to setup an ATI Redeon 9200 card for a multimedia PC. > > > >The goal is to be able to connect a video projector on the DVI head > >(screen 1) and the monitor on the main head (screen 0). And my kid > >would be rather disapointed if he can no longer play with gltron on > >the main screen, so I need a working DRI on the main head. > > > >With Xfree 4.3.0, I am able to setup DRI on one head, *or* set up a > >dual head (2 screens setup). > > > >But in the latter case, the DRI is disabled: Radeon driver does not > >support DRI with dual head setup even if the NoAccel option is set in > >the second Device. > > > >IS this statement correct or did I miss something ? > > In the xfree86 4.3/4.4 radeon driver you can't mix DRI and dualhead. > It may work without xinerama, depends what you are doing. > > > > >So I was considering to set up a single head configuration for X on > >the main head and set up a frame buffer on the second head. > > > >Thus I could use directly the -vo fbdev and display the video directly > >on the second head without going through X. > > > >Is that possible ? (OK, I'm drifting off-topic) > > > >Does anyone have a pointer and how to set up a radeon frame buffer on > >the second head ? > > AFAIK, the radeonfb kernel driver does not support multiple heads yet. > > > > >Thanks for any help. > > It sounds like what you may want is my radeon driver with mergedfb > support. It uses each crtc as a viewport into a single shared > framebuffer so the DRI works on both heads: > http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/MergedFB > > Alex > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster > http://search.yahoo.com > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 > ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Radeon 9200: DRI on one head and 2d on second head ?
-- > >Hello > >I'm trying to setup an ATI Redeon 9200 card for a multimedia PC. > >The goal is to be able to connect a video projector on the DVI head >(screen 1) and the monitor on the main head (screen 0). And my kid >would be rather disapointed if he can no longer play with gltron on >the main screen, so I need a working DRI on the main head. > >With Xfree 4.3.0, I am able to setup DRI on one head, *or* set up a >dual head (2 screens setup). > >But in the latter case, the DRI is disabled: Radeon driver does not >support DRI with dual head setup even if the NoAccel option is set in >the second Device. > >IS this statement correct or did I miss something ? In the xfree86 4.3/4.4 radeon driver you can't mix DRI and dualhead. It may work without xinerama, depends what you are doing. > >So I was considering to set up a single head configuration for X on >the main head and set up a frame buffer on the second head. > >Thus I could use directly the -vo fbdev and display the video directly >on the second head without going through X. > >Is that possible ? (OK, I'm drifting off-topic) > >Does anyone have a pointer and how to set up a radeon frame buffer on >the second head ? AFAIK, the radeonfb kernel driver does not support multiple heads yet. > >Thanks for any help. It sounds like what you may want is my radeon driver with mergedfb support. It uses each crtc as a viewport into a single shared framebuffer so the DRI works on both heads: http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/MergedFB Alex __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Security issues fixed in XFree86 4.4.0 ?
Hello list :) Just a quick question. On the XFree86 Security page http://www.xfree86.org/security there are three security issues that have apparently been fixed in release candidate 4.3.99.903. However, in the release notes of 4.4.0 http://www.xfree86.org/4.4.0/RELNOTES.html there is no mention of these issues. I am assuming that these issues are fixed in 4.4.0 but I need to be sure. Can anyone confirm this? Thanks in advance! lise _ MSN Search, for accurate results! http://search.msn.nl ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Fwd:XFree4.4 no more GPL?
Am Montag, 1. März 2004 13:11 schrieb Dominique Dumont: > Frank Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am Sonntag, 29. Februar 2004 23:18 schrieb Brouard Nicolas: > > Has XFree86 ever been GPL? don´t think so. > > No. But the new licence is not considered to be acceptable from most > people involved in distributions. However it was a reply on the topic ;) -- Gruß Frank ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] problem loggin in using graphic mode
Hi, I'm not sure wat I have done to cause this. I use to login using graphic mode at level 5 but after one time when i insert a floppy and tried reading a file which hangs my pc.. i can't login to graphic mode again which simply hangs there. I have to reboot my pc and change to boot from level 3 which is successful. but when i try to change to graphic mode again using either X, startx or telinit 5, it will goes into a blank screen. I have attached the log file for your reference. Please advise. ThanksCapital One Classic Mastercard 60 second response online. Get it now AOL users go here XFree86.0.log Description: Binary data xerror.log Description: Binary data
Re: [XFree86] Re: BUG: mouse behavior with linux 2.6.x
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:53:22AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michal Kosmulski wrote: > > >I recently upgraded from linux 2.4.23 to 2.6.2 and this caused some > >problems with my mouse in XFree86. I have XFree86 4.3.0 (official > >slackware 9.1 build) and I use nvidia's binary video driver (version 5336 > >at the moment). My mouse is a ps/2 logitech mouse with a mouse wheel > >(s48). After I upgraded to linux 2.6.2, after starting up X, the mouse > >cursor didn't react to mouse movement for about 2 seconds of moving the > >mouse. After that, the mouse pointer did move, but the mouse wheel was not > >working. At that time I had "Protocol" set to "Auto" for my mouse and with > >kernel 2.4.23 the mouse was detected correctly and the mouse wheel worked. > >After I manually changed the setting to "ImPS/2", the delay in mouse > >motion stopped and the wheel works again. i didn't find anything > >non-standard in my XFree86 logs, but there were some messages in the > >syslog. The first two messages have disappeared after changing "Auto" to > >"ImPS/2", the rest still appears whenever X is started. > >I also get strange mouse behavior once in a while (once every 3 days or > >so): suddenly the mouse starts moving all by itself - it seems to go to > >one of the screens corners, but I can't really see where it goes. This > >motion stops at the moment I press any key. I don't think this could be > >attributed to dust in the mouse mechanism or anything similar - I believe > >it is also a bug. > >Excerpt from /var/log/syslog follows: > > > > > >Feb 11 14:54:16 nowy kernel: psmouse.c: Wheel Mouse at > >isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 3 bytes away. > >Feb 11 15:46:17 nowy kernel: psmouse.c: Wheel Mouse at > >isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 3 bytes away. > >Feb 11 16:11:25 nowy kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set > >2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0). > >Feb 11 16:11:25 nowy kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't > >access hardware directly. > >Feb 11 16:11:25 nowy kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set > >2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0). > >Feb 11 16:11:25 nowy kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't > >access hardware directly. > > This is indeed an XFree86 bug. A few weeks ago David posted a > patch to attempt to fix it, however that patch didn't work. > > I added some debugging patches to the server and tracked the > problem down and fixed it in the latest Fedora Core development > XFree86 builds. > > You can grab the latest Red Hat XFree86 src.rpm from rawhide and > extract the relevant patch if you like. > > Hope this helps. > > > P.S. On a side note, before anyone asks ... I'd have submitted > my fix in bugzilla, however nobody was motivated to respond to > any of my emails on the subject of this bug over the last few > weeks while I was trying to help find a solution, so I am not > motivated to go out of my way to submit a patch either. Two way > street. Mike, Sorry you felt that you needed a response. Reading your emails it sounded like you were on top of things and would post a patch when you were ready for people to test. That's certainly why I hadn't responded. Maybe others felt that way too. Alan. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
