[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-13 Thread John Kielkopf
Davide Libenzi wrote:



A pre-data filter can work just fine here.

  


Yes, but being able to set something like mail-auth   0.0.0.0:587,... 
in server.tab would be better ;)

-John

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-12 Thread Shiloh Jennings
For performance reasons, I would really like to see this feature =
integrated
into XMail rather than doing it through an out of process filter.  I =
realize
this is less of an issue on Linux, but spawning additional processes =
under
Windows does result in a performance hit.  If the interface for filters
could be done through an in-process dll, then I would be more excited =
about
setting up this function through a filter.  Any chance XMail will =
eventually
support in-process dll based filters?  It would be a big help for us =
Windows
guys.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Tracy wrote:

 More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user =
submission

 of email independent of location.
=20
 MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires =
authentication.

 MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.
=20
 SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require =
authentication=20
 (authentication can be used to identify clients submitting =
direct-to-MX,
if=20
 desired).

A pre-data filter can work just fine here.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Tracy wrote:

 More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission 
 of email independent of location.
 
 MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication. 
 MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.
 
 SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authentication 
 (authentication can be used to identify clients submitting direct-to-MX, if 
 desired).

A pre-data filter can work just fine here.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Veeresh Khanorkar
John Kielkopf wrote:

Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the 
connection was established on?

Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA).  I 
want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal, 
but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about it, I 
  

U ,  I wonder what you are trying to do out here?

-VK

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Chris L. Franklin
Problably whats to have a port like 26 that seen only from the lan and 
does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the wan/lan 
and have it still require Auth-smtp.

-- Chris L. Franklin --

Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:

John Kielkopf wrote:

  

Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the 
connection was established on?

Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA).  I 
want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal, 
but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about it, I 
 



U ,  I wonder what you are trying to do out here?

-VK

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Tracy
More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission 
of email independent of location.

MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication. 
MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.

SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authentication 
(authentication can be used to identify clients submitting direct-to-MX, if 
desired).

At 08:55 9/10/2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Problably whats to have a port like 26 that seen only from the lan and
does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the wan/lan
and have it still require Auth-smtp.

-- Chris L. Franklin --

Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:

 John Kielkopf wrote:
 
 
 
 Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the
 connection was established on?
 
 Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA).  I
 want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal,
 but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about it, I
 
 
 
 
 U ,  I wonder what you are trying to do out here?
 
 -VK
 
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread John Kielkopf
Exactly what I'm trying to do.  Useful for clients that use the ever 
growing list of ISPs that block port 25.

Tracy wrote:

More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission 
of email independent of location.

MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication. 
MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.

SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authentication 
(authentication can be used to identify clients submitting direct-to-MX, if 
desired).

At 08:55 9/10/2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
  

Problably whats to have a port like 26 that seen only from the lan and
does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the wan/lan
and have it still require Auth-smtp.

-- Chris L. Franklin --

Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:



John Kielkopf wrote:



  

Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the
connection was established on?

Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA).  I
want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal,
but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about it, I






U ,  I wonder what you are trying to do out here?

-VK

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




  

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-10 Thread Shiloh Jennings
I would also really like to be able to do this.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

Exactly what I'm trying to do.  Useful for clients that use the ever=20
growing list of ISPs that block port 25.

Tracy wrote:

More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user =
submission=20
of email independent of location.

MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires =
authentication.=20
MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.

SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authentication =

(authentication can be used to identify clients submitting =
direct-to-MX, if

desired).

At 08:55 9/10/2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
 =20

Problably whats to have a port like 26 that seen only from the lan and
does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the =
wan/lan
and have it still require Auth-smtp.

-- Chris L. Franklin --

Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:

   =20

John Kielkopf wrote:



 =20

Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the
connection was established on?

Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 =
(MSA).  I
want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as =
normal,
but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about =
it, I




   =20

U ,  I wonder what you are trying to do out here?

-VK

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 =20

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   =20


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 =20


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Forced SMTP auth per port

2004-09-09 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:

 Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the 
 connection was established on?
 
 Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA).  I 
 want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal, 
 but I want to require auth on port 587...  The more I think about it, I 
 guess I could just make a PRE-DATA filter that checks the port in 
 @LOCALADDR and @USERAUTH... But I'd still like to know if xmail is 
 capable of it without the filter.

I'm afraid it can't.


- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]