[xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck

2002-12-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

Actually support is very good. I can call and have the server rebooted
or have them hook up a monitor and do a few simple things (in the case a
server wont boot) with no charge, check network status and the like
without a problem They are www.he.net

It's just the small things like DNS, they don't do forward DNS but have
to do reverse dns because many clients don't have a full ip block.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck


I'm not exactly sure how Xmail checks the validity...  I don't think you
can
check it against what's sent in HELO and still follow the rfc, so I
assume
you would make sure what you pull back from a reverse lookup also
resolves
as a forward lookup to the same address, but again, I don't know how
Davide
does it, or if that's the correct thing to do... I just know you should
have
a valid PTR for your SMTP servers IP address, and it should probably
match a
forward lookup that resolves to that address.

If support at your colo provider is that bad, I'd hate to see what
happens
if you need to attend your server(s) in a hurry.  Something as simple as
a
PTR record, or delegating a reverse lookup zone shouldn't bad that hard
of
thing to ask for... in fact the delegation should have happened when
they
gave you your ip block...

That said, I'm kinda torn on the whole RDNS issue.  I makes sense, but
so
many SMTP servers out there don't seem to have their PTR records set up
--
most of them small school and office mail servers -- and I'll admit I
didn't
have mine set correctly from the start until I ran into some servers
that
refused mail because of it... but at least they had a nice error
response,
telling me almost exactly what the problem was, unlike xmail.


- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Joakimsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck


>
> So it does not matter what domain the reverse points to? As if I ran
> multiple domains from one IP address?
>
> I do run my own DNS server but I cant get intouch with the person that
> deals with the DNS where my servers are located.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck
>
>
> If you run DNS on your own box you can have a classless reverse lookup
> zone
> delegated to your server by your ISP or bandwidth provider. (see:
> http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/rfc2317.html for more info.) If your ISP
is
> not
> willing to do this (some just don't know how, or don't know it's
> possible),
> then you can ask them to create the pointer record on their DNS
server.
>
> I've run into many servers that will reject mail if your SMTP server's
> IP
> address doesn't have a valid pointer record.  Just as your domain
should
> have at least one valid MX record, you also need to make sure the IP
> address
> your SMTP server uses has a valid pointer record.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Joakimsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:14 PM
> Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck
>
>
> >
> > But requiring that an IP have a reverse dns, would this be based on
> the
> > MX record for the sending domain? Then how can an IP have multiple
> > reverse DNS? Also I've been wating almost two months for the "dns
guy"
> > where I colo my servers to get back to you. If anyone really checked
> for
> > reverse dns I'd be in trouble because I cant even get someone to
setup
> > the reverse dns, my ip block is only 24 addresses that have been
> > reassigned to me so I CANT setup the reverse dns anyways.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:20 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [xmail] More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck
> >
> >
> > I keep giving SMTP-RDNSCheck a shot on every new version of Xmail,
on
> > one of
> > our low use servers, but it still seems a bit off.
> >
> > How does it react when the DNS server in charge of that PTR record
is
> > down?
> > It seems as if it refuses the mail with a permanent error instead of
> > trying
> > to resolve a few mor

[xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck

2002-12-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

So it does not matter what domain the reverse points to? As if I ran
multiple domains from one IP address?

I do run my own DNS server but I cant get intouch with the person that
deals with the DNS where my servers are located.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck


If you run DNS on your own box you can have a classless reverse lookup
zone
delegated to your server by your ISP or bandwidth provider. (see:
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/rfc2317.html for more info.) If your ISP is
not
willing to do this (some just don't know how, or don't know it's
possible),
then you can ask them to create the pointer record on their DNS server.

I've run into many servers that will reject mail if your SMTP server's
IP
address doesn't have a valid pointer record.  Just as your domain should
have at least one valid MX record, you also need to make sure the IP
address
your SMTP server uses has a valid pointer record.


- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Joakimsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck


>
> But requiring that an IP have a reverse dns, would this be based on
the
> MX record for the sending domain? Then how can an IP have multiple
> reverse DNS? Also I've been wating almost two months for the "dns guy"
> where I colo my servers to get back to you. If anyone really checked
for
> reverse dns I'd be in trouble because I cant even get someone to setup
> the reverse dns, my ip block is only 24 addresses that have been
> reassigned to me so I CANT setup the reverse dns anyways.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck
>
>
> I keep giving SMTP-RDNSCheck a shot on every new version of Xmail, on
> one of
> our low use servers, but it still seems a bit off.
>
> How does it react when the DNS server in charge of that PTR record is
> down?
> It seems as if it refuses the mail with a permanent error instead of
> trying
> to resolve a few more times and then returning a temporary error.
>
> And I'll ask yet again; isn't the error response "Server access
> forbidden by
> your IP" a bit cryptic?  One of the reasons for implementing such a
> check is
> to try to get other mail servers to fix such problems, but you need to
> give
> the user a little more to go on, so they can relay an educated
complaint
> to
> their system admins... If the error message can't be changed, would it
> be,
> or is it already, possible to have macros (like @@FROM in
MAILPROC.TAB)
> in
> CustomSMTPMessage so I can pass the error response and IP address of
the
> offending SMTP server in a querystring to my error description page,
> allowing me to help the user a bit more in telling them how to get
their
> problem fixed w/o taking a call?  Like "Please open
> http://www.myserver.com/errors.pl?smtpip=@@SMTPIP&error=@@ERROR to get
> more
> information about this error"
>
> Well, for now SMTP-RDNSCheck stays off.  Too much legitimate mail is
> refused, and way too many support calls asking what "Server access
> forbidden
> by your IP" means... most think they are on a ban list.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck

2002-12-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

But requiring that an IP have a reverse dns, would this be based on the
MX record for the sending domain? Then how can an IP have multiple
reverse DNS? Also I've been wating almost two months for the "dns guy"
where I colo my servers to get back to you. If anyone really checked for
reverse dns I'd be in trouble because I cant even get someone to setup
the reverse dns, my ip block is only 24 addresses that have been
reassigned to me so I CANT setup the reverse dns anyways.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] More questions on SMTP-RDNSCheck


I keep giving SMTP-RDNSCheck a shot on every new version of Xmail, on
one of
our low use servers, but it still seems a bit off.

How does it react when the DNS server in charge of that PTR record is
down?
It seems as if it refuses the mail with a permanent error instead of
trying
to resolve a few more times and then returning a temporary error.

And I'll ask yet again; isn't the error response "Server access
forbidden by
your IP" a bit cryptic?  One of the reasons for implementing such a
check is
to try to get other mail servers to fix such problems, but you need to
give
the user a little more to go on, so they can relay an educated complaint
to
their system admins... If the error message can't be changed, would it
be,
or is it already, possible to have macros (like @@FROM in MAILPROC.TAB)
in
CustomSMTPMessage so I can pass the error response and IP address of the
offending SMTP server in a querystring to my error description page,
allowing me to help the user a bit more in telling them how to get their
problem fixed w/o taking a call?  Like "Please open
http://www.myserver.com/errors.pl?smtpip=@@SMTPIP&error=@@ERROR to get
more
information about this error"

Well, for now SMTP-RDNSCheck stays off.  Too much legitimate mail is
refused, and way too many support calls asking what "Server access
forbidden
by your IP" means... most think they are on a ban list.

Thanks,
-John


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]