Re: [xul-talk] Is Mozilla XUL Development too hard?
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:05:55AM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote : Ken Walker writes in his blog story: [shortened Ken Walkers blog] [...] What I didn?t see (as a browser end user) was that the entire browser itself was being rendered with the Gecko engine?a clever, intuitive application framework had been invented. I only became aware of this fact last year when I was researching cross-platform development tools for my Senior Project. Then I started to realize XUL?s potential. I suspect a lot of people are still where I was a couple years ago?looking at Mozilla and saying, ?what?s the big deal?? I second this. That's exactly the same problem I had in the first. Keen, enthusiastic developers sometimes only realize too late what power they may have used unter mozillas hood. It is not that it is too late. But some more pr work would have prevented this from happening. - Markus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
Re: [xul-talk] Is Mozilla XUL Development too hard?
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:05:55AM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote : Ken Walker writes in his blog story: [shortened Ken Walkers blog] [...] What I didn?t see (as a browser end user) was that the entire browser itself was being rendered with the Gecko engine?a clever, intuitive application framework had been invented. I only became aware of this fact last year when I was researching cross-platform development tools for my Senior Project. Then I started to realize XUL?s potential. I suspect a lot of people are still where I was a couple years ago?looking at Mozilla and saying, ?what?s the big deal?? I second this. That's exactly the same problem I had in the first. Keen, enthusiastic developers sometimes only realize too late what power they may have used unter mozillas hood. It is not that it is too late. But some more pr work would have prevented this from happening. - Markus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
Re: [xul-talk] Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment Since Adam and Eve
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote : Any comments? It seems really to be one of the next big things from microsoft. I'm probably biased, but I would have prefered the separate style from content approach similiar to XUL. The way XAML is desribed at MSDN it definitely does not work this way. If I read the XML dialect it reads more like a it was written to be a decriptive language to be directly-to converted to any of the new managed Microsoft flavours, be it C#, JScript, etc. Which makes sense -- in the Microsoft-Way. XAML is targetting at developers familiar with their technology; you don't need to have an idea about CSS or Javascript at all: which however is the targeted developer audience of XUL. - Markus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
