I'd say improving the actual test ordering function is the way to go, yes.
Not sure how the ordering 'hint' should be like, but maybe setting an
integer priority via a decorator would work:
@OETestPriority(1) ---> runs first, no guarantees about relative order of
other tests with priority 1.
@OETestPriority(99) ---> runs last, ditto.
Default priority: 50 or similar.
Alex
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 11:51, Konrad Weihmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a few oeqa test cases, which always should run last in a test
> suite (log and file collectors for instance).
> Due to the ordering of the test case discovery I had to name all those
> tests like "zzz_" to move them to the end of the computed list.
>
> Unfortunately this is very error prone, as the OETestDepends tag does
> have major influence on the ordering (just a single misplaced tag in any
> test case can make it past those "zzz" cases).
> Also it makes things hard to read IMO.
>
> That brings me to my question, is there any way to ensure that test
> cases are run at the end of the complete list of test suites?
>
> If not does anyone have an idea how to create such a feature (maybe a
> new decorator or something like that)?
>
> Regards
> Konrad
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#51876): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/51876
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/79421525/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
