I'd say improving the actual test ordering function is the way to go, yes. Not sure how the ordering 'hint' should be like, but maybe setting an integer priority via a decorator would work: @OETestPriority(1) ---> runs first, no guarantees about relative order of other tests with priority 1. @OETestPriority(99) ---> runs last, ditto. Default priority: 50 or similar.
Alex On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 11:51, Konrad Weihmann <kweihm...@outlook.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a few oeqa test cases, which always should run last in a test > suite (log and file collectors for instance). > Due to the ordering of the test case discovery I had to name all those > tests like "zzz_<name>" to move them to the end of the computed list. > > Unfortunately this is very error prone, as the OETestDepends tag does > have major influence on the ordering (just a single misplaced tag in any > test case can make it past those "zzz" cases). > Also it makes things hard to read IMO. > > That brings me to my question, is there any way to ensure that test > cases are run at the end of the complete list of test suites? > > If not does anyone have an idea how to create such a feature (maybe a > new decorator or something like that)? > > Regards > Konrad > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#51876): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/51876 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/79421525/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
