Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[Alejandro Del Castillo]

On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528 
> 
> 
> I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-utils 
> dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX 
> Identifier to add.

thanks for doing this!

> The doubt concerns those script :
> makePackage
> opkg-build
> opkg-buildpackage
> opkg-compare-indexes
> opkg-diff
> opkg-extract-file
> opkg-graph-deps
> opkg-list-fields
> opkg-make-index
> opkg-show-deps
> opkg-unbuild
> opkg-update-index
> 
> What license do you want them to carry ?

Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris 
Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the thread).

My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that 
have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license the 
rest as GPLv2+ too.

Haris, Richard, thoughts?

-- 
Cheers,

Alejandro
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[richard . purdie]

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528 
> > <
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > >
> > 
> > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > utils 
> > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX 
> > Identifier to add.
> 
> thanks for doing this!
> 
> > The doubt concerns those script :
> > makePackage
> > opkg-build
> > opkg-buildpackage
> > opkg-compare-indexes
> > opkg-diff
> > opkg-extract-file
> > opkg-graph-deps
> > opkg-list-fields
> > opkg-make-index
> > opkg-show-deps
> > opkg-unbuild
> > opkg-update-index
> > 
> > What license do you want them to carry ?
> 
> Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris 
> Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> thread).
> 
> My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that 
> have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> the rest as GPLv2+ too.

I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the
import.

handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).

I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.

Cheers,

Richard




-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[Haris Okanovic]

I have no objection. Do you have a patch with this change?

-- Haris


On 10/11/19 10:54 AM, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:


On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:

Hi guys,

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528


I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-utils
dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
Identifier to add.


thanks for doing this!


The doubt concerns those script :
makePackage
opkg-build
opkg-buildpackage
opkg-compare-indexes
opkg-diff
opkg-extract-file
opkg-graph-deps
opkg-list-fields
opkg-make-index
opkg-show-deps
opkg-unbuild
opkg-update-index

What license do you want them to carry ?


Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the thread).

My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license the
rest as GPLv2+ too.

Haris, Richard, thoughts?


--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[Ycn aKaJoseph]

Hi,

GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and
GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I should
also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?

Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.

Best regards,



On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM  wrote:

> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> > > <
> > >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > > utils
> > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> > > Identifier to add.
> >
> > thanks for doing this!
> >
> > > The doubt concerns those script :
> > > makePackage
> > > opkg-build
> > > opkg-buildpackage
> > > opkg-compare-indexes
> > > opkg-diff
> > > opkg-extract-file
> > > opkg-graph-deps
> > > opkg-list-fields
> > > opkg-make-index
> > > opkg-show-deps
> > > opkg-unbuild
> > > opkg-update-index
> > >
> > > What license do you want them to carry ?
> >
> > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> > thread).
> >
> > My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
>
> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
> part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the
> import.
>
> handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
>
> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
From f660e59d0a1b80e4e7d206386577105a4465db2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yann CARDAILLAC 
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:15:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add SPDX license identifiers

Signed-off-by: Yann CARDAILLAC 
---
 arfile.py| 1 +
 opkg-build   | 2 +-
 opkg-buildpackage| 1 +
 opkg-compare-indexes | 1 +
 opkg-diff| 2 +-
 opkg-extract-file| 2 +-
 opkg-graph-deps  | 1 +
 opkg-list-fields | 1 +
 opkg-make-index  | 1 +
 opkg-show-deps   | 1 +
 opkg-unbuild | 1 +
 opkg-update-index| 1 +
 opkg.py  | 1 +
 update-alternatives  | 1 +
 14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 60edd9b..3b351d8 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 """
 arfile - A module to parse GNU ar archives.
 
diff --git a/opkg-build b/opkg-build
index 2517a2b..d09bbfe 100755
--- a/opkg-build
+++ b/opkg-build
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 : <<=cut
 =head1 NAME
 
diff --git a/opkg-buildpackage b/opkg-buildpackage
index b7c0e8c..9e00e42 100755
--- a/opkg-buildpackage
+++ b/opkg-buildpackage
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 #
 # Author: Oliver Kurth 
 #
diff --git a/opkg-compare-indexes b/opkg-compare-indexes
index b60d20a..45134e2 100755
--- a/opkg-compare-indexes
+++ b/opkg-compare-indexes
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 from __future__ import absolute_import
 from __future__ import print_function
 
diff --git a/opkg-diff b/opkg-diff
index bad0b3c..06e6020 100755
--- a/opkg-diff
+++ b/opkg-diff
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 pkg1=$1
 dir1=`echo $pkg1 | sed s/.opk//`
 dir1=`basename $dir1` 
diff --git a/opkg-extract-file b/opkg-extract-file
index 7c952ad..bc7c9bd 100755
--- a/opkg-extract-file
+++ b/opkg-extract-file
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 set -e
 
 if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
diff --git a/opkg-graph-deps b/opkg-graph-deps
index 6653fd5..316057a 100755
--- a/opkg-graph-deps
+++ b/opkg-graph-deps
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 from __future__ import absolute_import
 from __future__ import print_function
 
diff --git a/opkg-list-fields b/opkg-list-fields
index 8a5a588..434f2ae 100755
--- a/opkg-list-fields
+++ b/opkg-list-fields
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 from __future__ import absolute_import
 from __future__ import print_function
 
diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index
index 83e5160..6c6ecad 100755
--- a/opkg-make-index
+++ b/opkg-make-index
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 """
Utility to create opkg compatible indexes
 """
diff --git a/opkg-show-deps b/opkg-show-deps
index 153f

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[Alejandro Del Castillo]

On 10/14/19 7:36 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and 
> GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I 
> should also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?
> 
> Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.

I don't have a preference regarding adding a SPDX identifier for the 
Makefile. If I don't see any comments one way or the other, I will pull 
the patch in, by the end of the week.

thanks again for taking care of this,

Alejandro

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM  > wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
>  > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>  > > Hi guys,
>  > >
>  > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> 
> 
> 
>  > > <
>  > >
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
>  > > utils
>  > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
>  > > Identifier to add.
>  >
>  > thanks for doing this!
>  >
>  > > The doubt concerns those script :
>  > > makePackage
>  > > opkg-build
>  > > opkg-buildpackage
>  > > opkg-compare-indexes
>  > > opkg-diff
>  > > opkg-extract-file
>  > > opkg-graph-deps
>  > > opkg-list-fields
>  > > opkg-make-index
>  > > opkg-show-deps
>  > > opkg-unbuild
>  > > opkg-update-index
>  > >
>  > > What license do you want them to carry ?
>  >
>  > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
>  > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
>  > thread).
>  >
>  > My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
>  > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
>  > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
> 
> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
> part of handhelds.org
> 
> .
> I did modify things quite a bit during the
> import.
> 
> handhelds.org
> 
> 's
> CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
> 
> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier

[Alejandro Del Castillo]

merged, thanks!

On 10/15/19 2:58 PM, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/14/19 7:36 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and
>> GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I
>> should also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?
>>
>> Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.
> 
> I don't have a preference regarding adding a SPDX identifier for the
> Makefile. If I don't see any comments one way or the other, I will pull
> the patch in, by the end of the week.
> 
> thanks again for taking care of this,
> 
> Alejandro
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM > > wrote:
>>
>>  On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
>>   > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>>   > > Hi guys,
>>   > >
>>   > > 
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4_UTkft6YvqISMi_ZyxT3nbBDdxbyllWZ59OHmmikFQqAnQ-ln7pGeLjNidedeIGY0iDgA$
>>  
>> 
>>
>>   > > <
>>   > >
>>  
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
>>   > > >
>>   > >
>>   > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
>>   > > utils
>>   > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
>>   > > Identifier to add.
>>   >
>>   > thanks for doing this!
>>   >
>>   > > The doubt concerns those script :
>>   > > makePackage
>>   > > opkg-build
>>   > > opkg-buildpackage
>>   > > opkg-compare-indexes
>>   > > opkg-diff
>>   > > opkg-extract-file
>>   > > opkg-graph-deps
>>   > > opkg-list-fields
>>   > > opkg-make-index
>>   > > opkg-show-deps
>>   > > opkg-unbuild
>>   > > opkg-update-index
>>   > >
>>   > > What license do you want them to carry ?
>>   >
>>   > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
>>   > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
>>   > thread).
>>   >
>>   > My take on it:  since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
>>   > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
>>   > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
>>
>>  I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
>>  part of handhelds.org
>>  
>> .
>>  I did modify things quite a bit during the
>>  import.
>>
>>  handhelds.org
>>  
>> 's
>>  CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
>>  sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
>>  20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
>>
>>  I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
>>
>>  Cheers,
>>
>>  Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Cheers,

Alejandro
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto