Re: [zfs-discuss] Expanding a raidz vdev in zpool
Thanks Jimmy, worked like a charm! On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > On 12/31/2012 00:22, Curtis Schiewek wrote: > > I did an export and import, which I have read might be required before > > you'd see the extra space, but that still hasn't happened? > > Same here - I had to run "zpool online -e my_pool my_device" for each > device, then the new space came up. > > -- > jimmy > > ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Expanding a raidz vdev in zpool
I set it after I replaced and resilvered the drivers, but before I did the export/import. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > Did you set the autoexpand property? > ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Expanding a raidz vdev in zpool
Hello All, I have a zpool that consists of 2 raidz vdevs (raidz1-0 and raidz1-1). The first vdev is 4 1.5TB drives. The second was 4 500GB drives. I replaced the 4 500GB drives with 4 3TB drives. I replaced one at time, and resilvered each. Now the process is complete, I expected to have an extra 10TB (4*2.5TB) of raw space, but it's still the same amount of space. I did an export and import, which I have read might be required before you'd see the extra space, but that still hasn't happened? What am I missing? What can I do to get the extra space? Thanks, Curtis ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Problem with a failed replace.
Hi Mark, I've tried running "zpool attach media ad24 ad12" (ad12 being the new disk) and I get no response. I tried leaving the command run for an extended period of time and nothing happens. Thoughts? On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mark J Musante wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Curtis Schiewek wrote: > > cannot detach ad24: no valid replicas >> > > I bet that's an instance of CR 6909724. If you have another disk you can > spare, you can do a "zpool attach media ad24 ", wait for it to > finish resilvering, and then zfs should automatically clean up ad24 & ad18 > for you. > > > >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Mark J Musante > >wrote: >> >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Curtis Schiewek wrote: >>> >>>NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >>> >>>> media DEGRADED 0 0 0 >>>> raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> ad8ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> ad10 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> ad4ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> ad6ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 >>>> ad22 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> ad26 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> replacing UNAVAIL 0 66.4K 0 insufficient replicas >>>> ad24 FAULTED 0 75.1K 0 corrupted data >>>> ad18 FAULTED 0 75.2K 0 corrupted data >>>> ad24 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>>> >>>> >>> What happens if you try "zpool detach media ad24"? >>> >>> >> > > ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Problem with a failed replace.
cannot detach ad24: no valid replicas On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Mark J Musante wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Curtis Schiewek wrote: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >>media DEGRADED 0 0 0 >> raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>ad8ONLINE 0 0 0 >>ad10 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>ad4ONLINE 0 0 0 >>ad6ONLINE 0 0 0 >> raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 >>ad22 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>ad26 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>replacing UNAVAIL 0 66.4K 0 insufficient replicas >> ad24 FAULTED 0 75.1K 0 corrupted data >> ad18 FAULTED 0 75.2K 0 corrupted data >>ad24 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > > What happens if you try "zpool detach media ad24"? > ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Problem with a failed replace.
I was in the middle of doing a replace on a bad drive and I lost power. Now the replacement won't finish and I'm not sure what to do. I've tried detaching, reataching, moving drives around, and nothing works. Here's my zpool status: pool: media state: DEGRADED scrub: scrub completed after 10h7m with 0 errors on Thu Dec 2 09:05:04 2010 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM media DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad8ONLINE 0 0 0 ad10 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad4ONLINE 0 0 0 ad6ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 ad22 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad26 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing UNAVAIL 0 66.4K 0 insufficient replicas ad24 FAULTED 0 75.1K 0 corrupted data ad18 FAULTED 0 75.2K 0 corrupted data ad24 ONLINE 0 0 0 I've actually moved the drive (which is fine) that was on ad20 to the ad24 port on my controller, which is why it's showing up twice. Any thoughts on how to cancel the replace and restart it? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Consequences of adding a root vdev later?
So, If I have a pool that made up of 2 raidz vdevs, all data is striped across? So if I somehow lose a vdev I lose all my data?! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
