Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshots and Data Loss
Richard, > Applications can take advantage of this and there are services available > to integrate ZFS snapshots with Oracle databases, Windows clients, etc. which services are you referring to? best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
By the way, there are more than fifty bugs logged for marevell88sx, many of them about problems with DMA handling and/or driver behaviour under stress. Can it be that I'm stumbling upon something along these lines? http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6826483 Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Richard, it is the same controller used inside Sun's thumpers; It could be a problem in my unit (which is a couple of years old now), though. Is there something I can do to find out if I owe you that steak? :) Thanks. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Richard, thanks for the explanation. So can we say that the problem is in the disks loosing a command now and then under stress? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Errata, they're ST31000333AS and not 340AS Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Carson, they're seagate ST31000340AS with a firmware release CC1H, which from a rapid googling should have no firmware errors. Anyway, setting NCQ depth to 1 # echo zfs_vdev_max_pending/W0t1 | mdb -kw did not solve the problem :( Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Milek, this is it # iostat -En c1t0d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3808110AS Revision: DSerial No: Size: 80,03GB <80026361856 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 91 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t0d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 11 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 101 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t1d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 4 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 96 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t2d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 69 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 105 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t3d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 5 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 96 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t4d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 90 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 96 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t5d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 30 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 96 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c2t7d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: ATA Product: ST31000333AS Revision: CC1H Serial No: Size: 1000,20GB <1000204886016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 94 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 # What are hard errors? Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
> Possible, but less likely. I'd suggest running some > disk I/O tests, looking at > the drive error counters before/after. > These disks have a few months of life and are scrubbed weekly, no errors so far. I did try to use smartmontools, but it cannot report SMART logs nor start SMART tests, so I don't know how to look at their internal state. > You could also have a firmware bug on your disks. You > might try lowering the > number of tagged commands per disk and see if that > helps at all. from man marvell88sx I read that this driver has no tunable parameters, so I don't know how I could change NCQ depth. Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Carson, the strange thing is that this is happening on several disks (can it be that are all failing?) What is the controller bug you're talking about? I'm running snv_114 on this pc, so it is fairly recent. Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] strange pool disks usage pattern
Hi, I have a pc with a MARVELL AOC-SAT2-MV8 controller and a pool made up of a six disks in a raid-z pool with a hot spare. -bash-3.2$ /sbin/zpool status pool: nas stato: ONLINE scrub: scrub in progress for 9h4m, 81,59% done, 2h2m to go config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM nas ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 dischi di riserva c2t7d0AVAIL errori: nessun errore di dati rilevato Now, the problem is that issuing an iostat -Cmnx 10 or any other time intervall, I've seen, sometimes, a complete stall of disk I/O due to a disk in the pool (not always the same) being 100% busy. $ iostat -Cmnx 10 r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,00,30,02,0 0,0 0,00,00,1 0 0 c1 0,00,30,02,0 0,0 0,00,00,1 0 0 c1t0d0 1852,1 297,0 13014,9 4558,4 9,2 1,64,30,7 2 158 c2 311,8 61,3 2185,3 750,7 2,0 0,35,50,7 17 25 c2t0d0 309,5 34,7 2207,2 769,5 1,6 0,54,71,4 41 47 c2t1d0 309,3 36,3 2173,0 770,0 1,0 0,32,90,7 18 26 c2t2d0 296,0 65,5 2057,3 749,2 2,1 0,25,90,6 16 23 c2t3d0 313,3 64,1 2187,3 748,8 1,7 0,24,60,5 15 21 c2t4d0 311,9 35,1 2204,8 770,1 0,7 0,22,10,5 11 17 c2t5d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t7d0 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,4 14,73,2 30,4 0,0 0,20,0 13,2 0 2 c1 0,4 14,73,2 30,4 0,0 0,20,0 13,2 0 2 c1t0d0 1,70,0 58,90,0 3,0 1,0 1766,4 593,1 2 101 c2 0,30,07,70,0 0,0 0,00,30,4 0 0 c2t0d0 0,30,0 11,50,0 0,0 0,04,48,4 0 0 c2t1d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 100 100 c2t2d0 0,40,0 14,10,0 0,0 0,00,46,6 0 0 c2t3d0 0,40,0 14,10,0 0,0 0,00,32,5 0 0 c2t4d0 0,30,0 11,50,0 0,0 0,03,66,9 0 0 c2t5d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t7d0 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,03,10,03,1 0,0 0,00,00,7 0 0 c1 0,03,10,03,1 0,0 0,00,00,7 0 0 c1t0d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 2 100 c2 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t0d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t1d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 100 100 c2t2d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t3d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t4d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t5d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t7d0 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,00,10,00,4 0,0 0,00,01,2 0 0 c1 0,00,10,00,4 0,0 0,00,01,2 0 0 c1t0d0 0,0 29,50,0 320,2 3,4 1,0 113,9 34,6 2 102 c2 0,06,90,0 63,3 0,1 0,0 12,60,7 0 0 c2t0d0 0,04,40,0 65,5 0,0 0,08,70,8 0 0 c2t1d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 100 100 c2t2d0 0,07,40,0 62,7 0,1 0,0 15,40,8 1 1 c2t3d0 0,06,80,0 63,6 0,1 0,0 13,20,7 0 0 c2t4d0 0,04,00,0 65,1 0,0 0,07,90,7 0 0 c2t5d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t7d0 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,00,30,02,4 0,0 0,00,00,1 0 0 c1 0,00,30,02,4 0,0 0,00,00,1 0 0 c1t0d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 2 100 c2 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t0d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t1d0 0,00,00,00,0 3,0 1,00,00,0 100 100 c2t2d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t3d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t4d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t5d0 0,00,00,00,0 0,0 0,00,00,0 0 0 c2t7d0 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send of a cloned zvol
> Neither. > It'll send all necessary data (without having to > promote anything) so > that the receiving zvol has a working vol1, and it's > not a clone. Fajar, thanks for clarifying, this is what I was calling 'promotion'. It is like a "promotion" happening on the receiving side. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zfs send of a cloned zvol
Hi, I have a question, let's say I have a zvol named vol1 which is a clone of a snapshot of another zvol (its origin property is tank/my...@mysnap). If I send this zvol to a different zpool through a zfs send does it send the origin too that is, does an automatic promotion happen or do I end up whith a broken zvol? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Finding SATA cards for ZFS; was Lundman home NAS
Robin, LSI 3041er and 3081er are pci-e 4 and 8 ports sata cards; they are not hot-swap capable, as far as I know, but do work very well (I'm using several of them) in jbod and they're not too expensive. See this http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/host_bus_adapters/sas_hbas/lsisas3041er/index.html -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Status/priority of 6761786
Hi, I'd like to have it fixed as well, I'm having the same problem with 20 zvols which are windows xp images exported through iscsi, they are auto-snapshotted every hour/day/month, right now I've got nearly 1500 snapshots and booting this 4core xeon with 8Gb of ram and 8 disks on four pairs of mirrors takes around 15-20 minutes (last time I've booted it two months ago). So, it is definitely a bug, in my opinion, that such a pc takes 15 minutes to handle 1500 snapshots during boot while it would take a few seconds at worst to create the same number of snapshots. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool replace leaves pool degraded after resilvering
I forgot to mention this is a SunOS biscotto 5.11 snv_111a i86pc i386 i86pc version. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zpool replace leaves pool degraded after resilvering
Hi, I have a pc where a pool suffered a disk failure, I did replace the failed disk and the pool resilvered but, after resilvering, it was in this state mauri...@biscotto:~# zpool status iscsi pool: iscsi state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: resilver completed after 12h33m with 0 errors on Thu Jul 9 00:07:12 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM iscsiDEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror DEGRADED 0 0 0 c11t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t3d0 DEGRADED 0 0 23,0M too many errors cache c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors It says it resilvered ok and that there are no known data errors, but pool is still marked as degraded. I did a zpool clear and now it says it is ok mauri...@biscotto:~# zpool status pool: iscsi state: ONLINE scrub: resilver completed after 12h33m with 0 errors on Thu Jul 9 00:07:12 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM iscsiONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 326G resilvered cache c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Look at c11t3d0 which now reads 326G resilvered; my question is: is the pool ok? Why had I to issue a zpool clear if the resilvering process completed without problems? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zfs send of a cloned zvol
Hi, I'd like to understand a thing or two ... :) I have a zpool on which I've created a zvol, then I've snapshotted the zvol and I've created a clone out of that snapshot. Now, what happens if I do a zfs send mycl...@mysnap > myfile? I mean, is this stream enough to recover the clone (does it contain a promoted zvol?) or do I have to have a stream for the zvol (from which the clone was created) as well? And if I do a zfs recv of the clone's stream, does it 'find' by itself the zvol from which it stemmed? In other words, will I be able to recover the clone, and the zvol it depends on, in some way having a zfs stream of them? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] fmd writes tons of errors during a resilver
Eric, thanks for the hint. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] fmd writes tons of errors during a resilver
Hi, I'm trying to expand a raidz pool made up of six drives replacing one at a time with a bigger disk and waiting for resilver on a snv114 system. While resilvering fmd writes 8/10Mb each second inside /var/fm/fmd/errlog I had to disable it since it was filling up my boot disk. Is this expected? # zpool status pool: nas stato: DEGRADED condizione: viene eseguita la risincronizzazione di uno o più dispositivi. Il pool continuerà a funzionare normalmente oppure in stato degradato. azione: attendere la fine della risincronizzazione. scrub: resilver in progress for 6h52m, 79,82% done, 1h44m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM nas DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing DEGRADED 0 0 7,58M c2t4d0s0/o FAULTED 0 0 0 dati danneggiati c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 141G resilvered c2t5d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0ONLINE 0 0 0 errori: nessun errore di dati rilevato Here c1t0d0 is the boot disk (still on UFS) extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,0 3711,70,0 9661,0 0,0 0,60,00,2 2 60 c1t0d0 452,10,0 9707,50,0 0,4 0,20,90,4 13 20 c2t0d0 464,10,0 9785,00,0 0,3 0,20,60,4 11 18 c2t1d0 467,10,0 9695,00,0 0,4 0,20,80,4 12 19 c2t2d0 445,10,0 9743,00,0 0,4 0,20,90,4 14 19 c2t3d0 236,0 309,1 9842,1 9279,9 24,0 1,0 44,01,8 99 99 c2t4d0 420,10,0 9682,50,0 0,4 0,21,00,5 14 20 c2t5d0 cpu us sy wt id 12 32 0 55 extended device statistics r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0,0 3992,50,0 10281,7 0,0 0,60,00,2 2 63 c1t0d0 318,00,0 6042,70,0 0,3 0,21,10,7 13 22 c2t0d0 307,00,0 6129,70,0 0,4 0,21,40,8 15 24 c2t1d0 315,00,0 6137,70,0 0,4 0,21,20,7 17 22 c2t2d0 351,00,0 6020,20,0 0,4 0,21,00,6 15 21 c2t3d0 223,0 273,0 6453,7 6134,7 25,8 1,0 52,02,0 96 97 c2t4d0 346,00,0 5988,20,0 0,3 0,20,80,5 11 17 c2t5d0 in a few seconds it wrote # svcadm disable fmd # ls -l /var/fm/fmd/ totale 55934 drwx-- 3 root sys 512 10 apr 17:41 ckpt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28599664 12 giu 15:56 errlog -rw-r--r-- 1 root root3410 12 giu 15:55 fltlog drwx-- 2 root sys 512 12 giu 15:55 rsrc drwx-- 2 root sys 512 13 dic 2007 xprt the content of the file is not printable. Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send -R gets blocked by auto-snapshot service
Tim, I really was trying to have a full copy of my pool onto a different pc, so I think that I have to use -R otherwise I would loose all the history (monthly and weekly and daily snapshots) of my data which is valuable for me. That said, I fear that during a send -R the autosnapshot service should be disabled on the receiving end as well or it could start to change the incoming filesystem; am I right? And if it is so, it means that zfs send/receive cannot be used to really have backups of a heavily used system; apart from the autosnapshot service a user could be creating/deleting snapshot breaking the send/receive process. Anyway thanks a lot for you help! Maurilio. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zfs send -R gets blocked by auto-snapshot service
Hi, I'm trying to send a pool (its filesystems) from a pc to another, so I first created a recursive snapshot: # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT nas 840G 301G 3,28G /nas nas/drivers 12,6G 301G 12,6G /nas/drivers nas/nwserv 110G 301G 49,0G /nas/nwserv nas/rsync_clienti166G 301G 17,5G /nas/rsync_clienti nas/rsync_privati560M 301G 36,5K /nas/rsync_privati nas/rsync_privati/gianluca 560M 301G 560M /nas/rsync_privati/gianluca nas/samba486G 301G 486G /nas/samba nas/sviluppo-bak1,91G 301G 1,60G /nas/sviluppo-bak nas/winsrv 60,0G 301G 55,1G /nas/winsrv # zfs snapshot -r n...@t1 zfs list -t snapshot -r nas | grep T1 n...@t1 0 - 3,28G - nas/driv...@t1 0 - 12,6G - nas/nws...@t1 0 - 49,0G - nas/rsync_clie...@t1 101K - 17,5G - nas/rsync_priv...@t10 - 36,5K - nas/rsync_privati/gianl...@t1 0 - 560M - nas/sa...@t10 - 486G - nas/sviluppo-...@t1 0 - 1,60G - nas/win...@t1 0 - 55,1G - So, now I have a recursive snapshot encompassing all my nas pool and its filesystems. Then I issued a: pfexec /sbin/zfs send -R n...@t1 | ssh biscotto pfexec /sbin/zfs recv -dF iscsi/nasone this one from an user account which has auto login on the receiving box; the copy started ok and kept running for more than an hour, but stopped with this error: warning: cannot send 'nas/nws...@zfs-auto-snap.frequent-2009-06-08-11.00': no such pool or dataset warning: cannot send 'nas/nws...@zfs-auto-snap.frequent-2009-06-08-11.15': no such pool or dataset warning: cannot send 'nas/nws...@t1': incremental source (@zfs-auto-snap.frequent-2009-06-08-11.15) does not exist Now, from the error it seems that T1 needs all the snapshots which were active at the time it was created, which is not what I would expect from a snapshot. I've now stopped the auto-snapshot service and restarted the send, but I'm wondering if this is the correct and expected behaviour or If I'm making something wrong or maybe I did not fully understand what send -R is supposed to do. Maurilio -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zfs snapshots sometimes don't report correct used space
Hi, I'm using Tim Foster's zfs automatic snapshot to keep copies of a zfs filesystem. I keep 30 days, seven weeks and 12 months, these snapshots get created at 00:00 every day and when a new week starts (or a new month) there are two or three snapshots that start at the same time. Using zfs list I see that when more than one snapshot starts at the same time, the USED column of the report shows no space occupied, while, when just a single snapshot is done, I can see how much space is being used. Snaphots are ok, I mean, if I go inside one of the 0 byte used one I can see that the files are ok and their content is what they really contained at that point in time, so it seem just a 'cosmetic' problem. Here his zfs list on that filesystem ---8<- # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNT POINT nas262G 879G 11,2G /nas nas/nwserv13,0G 879G 6,86G /nas/ nwserv nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-02-27-00:00:00 519M - 6,99G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-02-28-00:00:00 491M - 7,02G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-02-29-00:00:000 - 6,91G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:weekly-2008-02-29-00:00:00 0 - 6,91G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-01-00:00:000 - 6,93G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:monthly-2008-03-01-00:00:00 0 - 6,93G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:weekly-2008-03-01-00:00:00 0 - 6,93G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-02-00:00:00 241M - 6,94G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-03-00:00:00 242M - 6,94G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-04-00:00:00 538M - 6,96G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-05-00:00:00 499M - 6,74G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-06-00:00:00 519M - 6,80G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-07-00:00:00 514M - 6,81G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-08-00:00:000 - 6,80G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:weekly-2008-03-08-00:00:00 0 - 6,80G - nas/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:daily-2008-03-09-00:00:00 256M - 6,85G - --->8- As you can see, when there is a weekly or monthly snapshot used space is 0. Is this a known issue? Best regards. Maurilio. PS. nas/nwserv is compressed and has atime=off # zfs get all nas/nwserv | grep local nas/nwserv compressionon local nas/nwserv atime offlocal nas/nwserv snapdirhidden local nas/nwserv com.sun:auto-snapshot:weekly true local nas/nwserv com.sun:auto-snapshot:monthly true local nas/nwserv com.sun:auto-snapshot:dailytrue local # This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] dos programs on a
Alan, I'm using nexenta core rc4 which is based on nevada 81/82. zfs casesensitivity is set to 'insensitive' Best regards. Maurilio. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] dos programs on a ZFS+CIFS server setup
Hi, I'm testing ZFS+CIFS server using nexenta core rc4, everything seems fine and speed is also ok, but DOS programs don't see sub-dirs (command.com sees them, though). I've set casesensitivity=insensitive in the ZFS filesystem that I'm sharing. I've made this test using Windows2000, Windows2003 Server and Windows XP (to connect to the share) and norton commander for dos plus a vertical application written in clipper 5.2e. Is this a known issue? Should I file a bug? Best regards. Maurilio. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
