Re: [zfs-discuss] Shared Pools in ZFS

2007-10-19 Thread Vic Cornell
Hi Thanks for your answer. We use iSCSI and NFS for some data but the disk I
have in mind are the ones we use for our production databases where latency
and IOPS require us to use direct attach.

Vic


-- 
Vic Cornell
UNIX Systems Administrator 
Landmark Information Group Ltd

5-7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, 
Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY

T: 01392 888690 
F: 01392 441709

http://www.landmarkinfo.co.uk/




> From: Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: OpenSolaris
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:41:24 +0100
> To: Vic Cornell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Shared Pools in ZFS
> 
> Vic Cornell wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I went to storage expo in the UK yesterday. During a long train journey
>> back to the west country boss and I  were discussing the joys of storage
>> management in a production environment and where ZFS would be able to help.
>> Whilst it would be great if ZFS were a clustered file-system and able to
>> share its pools and file systems read/write across multiple hosts, what
>> would be almost as good would be a shared pool where specific hosts could
>> write to specific file systems. In that way we could use all of the goodies
>> of pool management, tiered storage, migration etc without the metadata
>> overhead of shared locks.
>> 
>> Is this feasible?
> 
> No for exactly the same reasons that ZFS isn't a cluster filesystem.
> 
> Why isn't sharing via NFS or iSCSI practical in your case ?
> 
> -- 
> Darren J Moffat


Registered Office: 5-7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY
Registered Number 2892803 Registered in England & Wales 

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
copy, distribute or disclose the e-mail or any part of its contents or take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please e-mail the sender by replying to this message. All reasonable
precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail.
Landmark Information Group Limited cannot accept responsibility for loss or
damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments and recommend that
you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use. 

www.landmarkinfo.co.uk 


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Shared Pools in ZFS

2007-10-18 Thread Darren J Moffat
Vic Cornell wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I went to storage expo in the UK yesterday. During a long train journey
> back to the west country boss and I  were discussing the joys of storage
> management in a production environment and where ZFS would be able to help.
> Whilst it would be great if ZFS were a clustered file-system and able to
> share its pools and file systems read/write across multiple hosts, what
> would be almost as good would be a shared pool where specific hosts could
> write to specific file systems. In that way we could use all of the goodies
> of pool management, tiered storage, migration etc without the metadata
> overhead of shared locks.
> 
> Is this feasible?

No for exactly the same reasons that ZFS isn't a cluster filesystem.

Why isn't sharing via NFS or iSCSI practical in your case ?

-- 
Darren J Moffat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Shared Pools in ZFS

2007-10-18 Thread Vic Cornell
Hi All,

I went to storage expo in the UK yesterday. During a long train journey
back to the west country boss and I  were discussing the joys of storage
management in a production environment and where ZFS would be able to help.
Whilst it would be great if ZFS were a clustered file-system and able to
share its pools and file systems read/write across multiple hosts, what
would be almost as good would be a shared pool where specific hosts could
write to specific file systems. In that way we could use all of the goodies
of pool management, tiered storage, migration etc without the metadata
overhead of shared locks.

Is this feasible?

Cheers,

Vic
-- 
Vic Cornell
UNIX Systems Administrator 
Landmark Information Group Ltd

5-7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, 
Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY

T: 01392 888690 
F: 01392 441709

http://www.landmarkinfo.co.uk/




Registered Office: 5-7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY
Registered Number 2892803 Registered in England & Wales 

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be subject to
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
copy, distribute or disclose the e-mail or any part of its contents or take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please e-mail the sender by replying to this message. All reasonable
precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail.
Landmark Information Group Limited cannot accept responsibility for loss or
damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments and recommend that
you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use. 

www.landmarkinfo.co.uk 


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss