Re: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
Can I humbly recommend that you don't reinvent the wheel and have a look at www.issuetrackerproduct.com It's really good for QA and general problem reporting. Thanks, I'll take a look at it right away. :) Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
bruno desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28.10.2005 11:09:00: Have you tried Trac ? No, but now I will. It's listed as software development tracking so I've ignored it. :) Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
Depends on what you are going to use it for. So, tell us! :-) Not sure myself yet. :) There will certainly be a couple of Plone sites, and I plan on writing a simple application for tracking Non-Conformaties, Incident Reports etc (QA related). But based on the responses until now, I've already decided to go with 2.8. I also want to thank everyone who's responded to this thread, especially the OS related comments. :) Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Re: Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
WRT maintenance of the system: while at ZC, I actually maintained a separate 'zc-python' RPM which installed itself in '/opt/zc'; all the Zope RPMs I maintained depended on 'zc-python' rather than 'python'. What's the recommended way of maintaining an extra Python installation for Zope? Is changing the path enough or should one run the instance in a chroot'ed environment? And what's supposed to be the correct Python version for 2.8.4 btw? Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
I'm new to Zope, and I've been playing with 2.8.1, but I really haven't done any real work with it yet. Now I expect to get my new decicated Zope hardware tomorrow, so I have to decide if I should go for 2.8.4 or 3.1.0. Any tips if I should go for the latest and greatest or stick with 2.8? I've also seen comments that running Zope on RHEL/CentOS might not be wise. My test env. is using FC4, but I'm planning to install CenOS 4.2 on the production server. Unwise choice? Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
RE: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
Doyon, Jean-Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 26.10.2005 22:40:09: I'm using Zope 2.7.x on RHEL 3.x without trouble ... Though I should be upgrading to CentOS 4.x fairly soon ... what problems have you heard of? I think the problems were related to OS software versions like Python. And most of us don't like rolling our own packages if we don't have to I'd guess. :) But I've decided to give CentOS 4.2 (or RHEL4U2 in that language :)) a shot anyway. Regards, Harald ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
