[Zope-dev] [Zope 2] Skipping beta releases?

2005-07-03 Thread Andreas Jung

Hi,

the current release model of Zope 2 is based on doing at least one beta 
release for minor releases (Zope 2.7.X where  X  0). I have the strong 
impression that beta releases are not adopted and tested by most people. 
They usually use the final version of a release. So most bugs are 
discovered in final releases and not in beta releases. People interested in 
the most current version can and do download the sources from the CVS or 
SVN. So I propose to skip beta releases for minor releases in the future. 
Alpha and beta releases are fine for major releases. Beta releases for a 
minor release can be made if there are some changes or fixes that must be 
tested by people.


Any comments?

Andreas

pgpWhFihmGUix.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [z3-five] Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9 goals

2005-07-03 Thread Martijn Faassen

Andreas Jung wrote:



--On 2. Juli 2005 20:52:54 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:





I wonder whether it's possible to expose zope 3's authentication system
to Zope 2, though that may be too much of a mismatch between security
systems.



Wasn't that a major goal of Jim for Z 2.9?


Don't know if that is going to happen for Zope 2.9.

What I meant though is to expose the pluggable auth part of Zope 3 as 
opposed to rewriting the zope 2 security system in terms of zope 3 
security, which I believe Jim's goal is.


Regards,

Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope 2] Skipping beta releases?

2005-07-03 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 09:13 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
 Alpha and beta releases are fine for major releases. Beta releases for a 
 minor release can be made if there are some changes or fixes that must be 
 tested by people.
 
 Any comments?

+1 ... alphas/betas should be done at your discretion.


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope 2] Skipping beta releases?

2005-07-03 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On 3 Jul 2005, at 15:16, Chris McDonough wrote:


On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 09:13 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:

Alpha and beta releases are fine for major releases. Beta releases  
for a
minor release can be made if there are some changes or fixes that  
must be

tested by people.

Any comments?


+1

It's a sad state of affairs that the wailing and gnashing of teeth  
only ever happens after a third-dot final release and few people  
bother with the betas. In the light of the effort needed to produce a  
Zope beta I support the decision.


I personally would still continue doing betas for things like CMF,  
but then again the work needed to put together a release is a lot  
less. And I still live under the illusion that those betas see a  
modicum of testing ;)


jens

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope 2] Skipping beta releases?

2005-07-03 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 3. Juli 2005 15:32:29 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I personally would still continue doing betas for things like CMF,  but
then again the work needed to put together a release is a lot  less. And
I still live under the illusion that those betas see a  modicum of
testing ;)



Creating the release archive is not really the problem. The big pain in the 
a** is the software package product on zope.org and dealing with it :-/


Andreas

pgpr4x5bMgtfY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Extending Zope's ZConfig Schema in a Product?

2005-07-03 Thread Stuart Bishop
Sidnei da Silva wrote:

 Right, seems that's my only choice for the time being.
 

We currently do this in our 'start Z3' script before any of the Zope imports
are done:

# Disgusting hack to use our extended config file schema rather than the
# Z3 one. TODO: Add command line options or other to Z3 to enable
# overriding this -- StuartBishop 20050406
from zdaemon.zdoptions import ZDOptions
ZDOptions.schemafile = the_path_to_our_schema_dot_xml

You can then write a schema.xml that inherits from the Z3 one:

schema extends=../../zope/app/server/schema.xml
  sectiontype name=foo
 key name=bar datatype=string default=Fnord /
  /sectiontype

  multisection name=+ type=foo attribute=foo /
/schema


We are trying to centralize all our knobs and buttons into one place - ZCML
isn't suitable for tweaking an application being rolled out to multiple
servers (dev boxes, staging servers, production server instances) because
there is too much boilerplate and syntax around the knob you need to tweak,
and way too complex for a drunk sysadmin to handle. eg. it is much easier to
have 'smtp on' in launchpad.conf than it is to configure the correct IMailer
directives and whatnot with he correct magic names so that the application
sends email via SMTP rather than sendmail.

So far, ZConfig has been way overkill for this but allows us to keep our
config in the same config as the port numbers and logfile destinations
(without having to generate it from some other source, which we will
probably do in the future to solve some production rollout issues).

-- 
Stuart Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stuartbishop.net/


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )