Re: [Zope-dev] ZEO client cache not working properly with beforestorage

2011-11-07 Thread Malthe Borch
On 25 October 2011 17:53, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'll try and see if I can understand what might be the right thing to
 expect and write a test case for that.

Following up here on the list to get some feedback on the patch I
submitted concerning this issue:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/881493

The patch includes a test case and necessary code modifications.

If someone could review the test case included in the patch, I'd appreciate it.

\malthe
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Plone-developers] experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB

2011-11-07 Thread Malthe Borch
On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
 The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
 object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
 zope.interface and zope.component themselves.  Is this the right
 approach?  If not why and what would be better?  How might this approach
 be improved?

(removed plone-dev from cc).

Isn't it symptom treatment though? If you've got an add-on which adds
marker interfaces to general objects, shouldn't that add-on remove –
or no longer provide – those same interfaces when it's uninstalled? At
least in Plone, you can easily query content objects providing a
particular set of interfaces.

I think it's a non-goal to be able to run a system without all the
required software – which is how I understand it when you just do a
hard remove of an add-on without a prior soft remove.

\malthe
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4 - San Francisco sprint and beyond

2011-11-07 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
 Hi.

 A couple of us came together before the Plone conference to work on
 various Zope related topics. We worked on the following areas:

This sounds like it was a very productive sprint.

Thanks for the update.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZEO client cache not working properly with beforestorage

2011-11-07 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 25 October 2011 17:53, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'll try and see if I can understand what might be the right thing to
 expect and write a test case for that.

 Following up here on the list to get some feedback on the patch I
 submitted concerning this issue:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/881493

 The patch includes a test case and necessary code modifications.

 If someone could review the test case included in the patch, I'd appreciate 
 it.

Thanks. I'll review it.  Not sure when :), but I'll definitely put this
on my to-do list for 3.11.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 45

2011-11-07 Thread Tres Seaver
 [1]FAILED  Total languishing bugs for zope2: 4
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052262.html


Wow, only 4?


 [2]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052267.html

Transient buildout failure:

 command timed out: 3600 seconds without output, killing pid 7166


 [3]FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052265.html


Same as it ever was:  who was it again who feels responsible for
maintenance on z3c.form?



Tres.
-- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Plone-developers] experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB

2011-11-07 Thread Raphael Ritz
On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
 On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Pattersonm...@rpatterson.net  wrote:
 The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
 object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
 zope.interface and zope.component themselves.  Is this the right
 approach?  If not why and what would be better?  How might this approach
 be improved?

 (removed plone-dev from cc).

 Isn't it symptom treatment though?

Yes, it is but the symptom is severe and not uncommon.
The problem Ross is addressing here just happens way too often
in the real world to simply say Sorry, user error.

Just my 2 cents,

Raphael


 If you've got an add-on which adds
 marker interfaces to general objects, shouldn't that add-on remove –
 or no longer provide – those same interfaces when it's uninstalled? At
 least in Plone, you can easily query content objects providing a
 particular set of interfaces.

 I think it's a non-goal to be able to run a system without all the
 required software – which is how I understand it when you just do a
 hard remove of an add-on without a prior soft remove.

 \malthe
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 45

2011-11-07 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/07/2011 08:11 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
 On Monday, November 07, 2011 07:32:04 AM Tres Seaver wrote:
 Same as it ever was:  who was it again who feels responsible 
 for maintenance on z3c.form?
 
 I am maintaining z3c.form, just not the Windows release, since 
 I have (a) no suitable setup and (b) really no interest to do 
 so.
 
 OK, cool.  The test failure here doesn't appear to be related to
  Windows (I think Hanno pinned lxml to work around earlier 
 failutres)
 
 http://winbot.zope.org/builders/z3c.form_py_265_32/builds/334/steps/test/log


 
s/stdio
 
 Fixed. It turned out that this test pointed out a bug in Chameleon 
 that has now been fixed. So all I needed to do is remove the test. 
 :-) Easy enough.
 
 I applied the fix to trunk, which is where this test was failing 
 from, right?

Correct.  Thanks very much -- I think tomorrow we should see a
completely green board for the first time in a long time.


Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk632YUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7EnQCggmPL/lTr/AKvZcL16Xv3Ca/N
NtgAn01QCkCI4L6/kGwC5BKQIgEhhBO7
=2Kwk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] New ZTK-Release?

2011-11-07 Thread Michael Howitz
Hi all,

after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in 
time for a series new ZTK releases:

* 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates),
* 1.1.3,
* 1.2c1 (a new release branch from the trunk)

Who is in charge for the ZTK releases?
Is there still the ZTK team?


Yours sincerely,
-- 
Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer
gocept gmbh  co. kg · Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

2011-11-07 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
  I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
  (jinty-python3).
  
  It gives up Python 2.5 compatibility and depends on six
  (http://packages.python.org/six/). Any objections to me merging this
  branch?
 
 I just merged this to trunk.

Thanks to some great work by Tres, it looks like the buildbots are green
and this change is bedded down.

Could someone release zope.schema trunk? 

(or give me rights to do so, jinty on pypi)

-- 
Brian Sutherland
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

2011-11-07 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
  I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
  (jinty-python3).
 
  It gives up Python 2.5 compatibility and depends on six
  (http://packages.python.org/six/). Any objections to me merging this
  branch?

 I just merged this to trunk.

 Thanks to some great work by Tres, it looks like the buildbots are green
 and this change is bedded down.

 Could someone release zope.schema trunk?

 (or give me rights to do so, jinty on pypi)

I empowered you!

:)

Thanks.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testrunner and nose count doctests differently

2011-11-07 Thread Chris Withers
Hi Benji,

On 03/11/2011 12:31, Benji York wrote:

 If you will tell me how you wired up Manuel and nose, I'd love to add a
 how-to section to the Manuel docs.

The only hiccup is that nose doesn't respect a test_suite function by 
default, so I wrote a plugin to make it do the right thing:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/nose_fixes/1.0

 On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk  wrote:
 The code uses Manuel, under both nose and zope.testrunner:

 Manuel will report the same test count under both nose and
 zope.testrunner but I don't know if nose respects the count provided.

 You could put a breakpoint in TestCase.countTestCases() of
 manuel/testing.py and see if it gets called by nose and what it does
 with the result.

Well, grepping through the nose source returns no matches for 
countTestCases, so I'm guessing it doesn't respect this.

Nose people: any idea *why* nose doesn't respect this method?

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing  Python Consulting
 - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] New ZTK-Release?

2011-11-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
 after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in 
 time for a series new ZTK releases:

 * 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates),
 * 1.1.3,
 * 1.2c1 (a new release branch from the trunk)

 Who is in charge for the ZTK releases?
 Is there still the ZTK team?

The ZTK release team is still officially in place.

I can take care of the ZTK 1.0 and 1.1 bugfix releases.

I won't be involved in ZTK 1.2 decisions myself, the same way I won't
take care of Zope2 4.0.

So I'm not sure what the process for that will be.

Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 46

2011-11-07 Thread Tres Seaver
 [1]FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052312.html


Ye!  That one is now green too!


Tres.
-- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

2011-11-07 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Brian Sutherland
 br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
  On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
   I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
   (jinty-python3).
  
   It gives up Python 2.5 compatibility and depends on six
   (http://packages.python.org/six/). Any objections to me merging this
   branch?
 
  I just merged this to trunk.
 
  Thanks to some great work by Tres, it looks like the buildbots are green
  and this change is bedded down.
 
  Could someone release zope.schema trunk?
 
  (or give me rights to do so, jinty on pypi)
 
 I empowered you!
 
 :)

Drat, I forgot the unreleased Python 3 support in zope.testing. Could
you empower me there too?

-- 
Brian Sutherland
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )