Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-27 Thread Chris Withers

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:


Its not. Its a lot easier to find answers to my questions though at the 
Apple's support discussion boards, when I have an Apple issue, rather 
than searching Google because I'm searching through very specific 
content, not the web in general and therefore get more accurate results 
and a faster resolution.


Hmmm, well, in the case of Zope, I honestly think you get better results 
if you _do_ use Google because you're not only limiting your search to 
Zope.org, which isn't usually the best source for information...



Why should it be on zope.org?


Um, because it's useful information about Zope, which is sort of what 
Zope.org is about? 


Well, I don't know if that _is_ what zope.org is about anymore. It's 
been so poor for so long that people have found or created other 
resources and those aren't going to go away even if zope.org did 
suddenly become magically better ;-)


The Web Site for the Zope Community (...who are 
currently discussing Zope at various other places on the web). Thanks 
for visiting. :)


Well, point taken, but I really think zope.org should be a gateway to 
those existing resources. If, at a later stage, those resources want to 
migrate back to zope.org, then great, but until then, lets leave them be...


cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-27 Thread Chris Withers

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:



 Damn. This really is very good. Would there be any problem with just
 replacing the main_template and Products page on Zope.rog with this 
design?


I already proposed to setup his design as an alternative skin in 
zope.org for *testing* with the current content to Tom - he did not 
comment on that.


Sounds good to me, what do I need to do? I'm happy to edit/create ZPT as 
necessary.


I think Michael already answered this below ;-)

Nevertheless, even if we could use it as suggested, we'd need to make 
some changes (right column should be removed or replaced on 
non-Frontpage pages), styles should be defined along the current 
stylesheet, ...


The tying in with existing styles will likely be the suckiest part. If 
you manage that, I think we all owe you beer! *grinz*


Do you have the access rights you need to create a new zope.org skin?

cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-27 Thread Michael Haubenwallner

Chris Withers wrote:

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:



 Damn. This really is very good. Would there be any problem with just
 replacing the main_template and Products page on Zope.rog with this 
design?


I already proposed to setup his design as an alternative skin in 
zope.org for *testing* with the current content to Tom - he did not 
comment on that.


Sounds good to me, what do I need to do? I'm happy to edit/create ZPT 
as necessary.


I think Michael already answered this below ;-)

Nevertheless, even if we could use it as suggested, we'd need to make 
some changes (right column should be removed or replaced on 
non-Frontpage pages), styles should be defined along the current 
stylesheet, ...


The tying in with existing styles will likely be the suckiest part. If 
you manage that, I think we all owe you beer! *grinz*


Do you have the access rights you need to create a new zope.org skin?



Almost all work is adjusting the stylesheets...
I'd suggest we meet in IRC (#zope-web) and discuss next steps needed.

Michael

--
http://zope.org/Members/d2m
http://planetzope.org

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-27 Thread Andrew Sawyers
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 08:26 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
 Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
  Why should it be on zope.org?
  
  Um, because it's useful information about Zope, which is sort of what 
  Zope.org is about? 
 
 Well, I don't know if that _is_ what zope.org is about anymore. It's 
 been so poor for so long that people have found or created other 
 resources and those aren't going to go away even if zope.org did 
 suddenly become magically better ;-)
Zope.org shouldn't have any designs to do such.  Good projects which
have stepped up should be rewarded and encouraged.
 
  The Web Site for the Zope Community (...who are 
  currently discussing Zope at various other places on the web). Thanks 
  for visiting. :)
 
 Well, point taken, but I really think zope.org should be a gateway to 
 those existing resources. If, at a later stage, those resources want to 
 migrate back to zope.org, then great, but until then, lets leave them be...
 
I agree, they should be positioned on zope.org as prominent resources.
Zope.org should be about what's in svn.zope.org and the technology.
Excellent docs, good introductory information (i.e. marketing speak) and
downloads for those products in svn.zope.org

All, IMNSHO,
Andrew
 cheers,
 
 Chris
 

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-26 Thread Tom Von Lahndorff


On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:06 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:


Chris Withers wrote:
 Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:

 http://www.modscape.com/zope/v3/products_html

 Added a products page. Linked from the nav.

 Damn. This really is very good. Would there be any problem with just
 replacing the main_template and Products page on Zope.rog with  
this design?



I already proposed to setup his design as an alternative skin in  
zope.org for *testing* with the current content to Tom - he did not  
comment on that.


Sounds good to me, what do I need to do? I'm happy to edit/create ZPT  
as necessary.




Nevertheless, even if we could use it as suggested, we'd need to  
make some changes (right column should be removed or replaced on  
non-Frontpage pages), styles should be defined along the current  
stylesheet, ...


Michael

--
http://zope.org/Members/d2m
http://planetzope.org
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


[ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-25 Thread Tom Von Lahndorff

http://www.modscape.com/zope/v3/products_html

Added a products page. Linked from the nav.
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-25 Thread Chris Withers

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:


http://www.modscape.com/zope/v3/products_html

Added a products page. Linked from the nav.


Damn. This really is very good. Would there be any problem with just 
replacing the main_template and Products page on Zope.rog with this design?


cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-25 Thread Michael Haubenwallner

Chris Withers wrote:
 Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:

 http://www.modscape.com/zope/v3/products_html

 Added a products page. Linked from the nav.

 Damn. This really is very good. Would there be any problem with just
 replacing the main_template and Products page on Zope.rog with this 
design?



I already proposed to setup his design as an alternative skin in 
zope.org for *testing* with the current content to Tom - he did not 
comment on that.


Nevertheless, even if we could use it as suggested, we'd need to make 
some changes (right column should be removed or replaced on 
non-Frontpage pages), styles should be defined along the current 
stylesheet, ...


Michael

--
http://zope.org/Members/d2m
http://planetzope.org
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Withers

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:



On the download page, Zope 2 should be above Zope 3.


Really? I thought most people want to push Zope 3. Shouldn't the latest 
release be listed first? I really don't care on way or the other, just 
curious.


Zope 2 is the more stable, tested release. I don't care what people want 
to push, end users should get hinted towards the most stable release ;-)


Yeah, seems like no one likes the idea of message boards. My thinking 
was just that when I search for information I always go to Google before 
I'd ever search Zope.org. 


Why is that a problem?

list threads posted online. It just seems like there's all of this 
valuable chatter that goes on about Zope that never gets to the Zope.org 


Why should it be on zope.org?

cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-23 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 3/23/06, Tom Von Lahndorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was also thinking that there should be a discussion board on the
 site like Apple's support boards.

I don't want both mailing lists and forums unless they can be integrated.

--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-23 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I was also thinking that there should be a discussion board on the  
site like Apple's support boards. Many of the support questions  
answered on Apple's boards are from other customers. It's a nice  
one stop shop for questions and answers for those who may not want  
to subscribe to mailing list. It would be nice to have that option.

http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa


- -1 on Forums. There is no good forum software around for Zope which  
is fast and won't bog down the server, and it introduces a big  
software maintenance/editorial burden.


jens

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEInMhRAx5nvEhZLIRAjcJAJ0X/YpMIYwWStV3UA9oasJRbCeqRwCgho5M
48wFFJHkpIBsjalb7FGQX14=
=t+6u
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Withers

Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:


http://www.modscape.com/zope

03/22/06. Updated the homepage. Added the Zope 3 box. Created a download 
page. Click on Download Zope under Download in the nav.


I don't like the big digits for 2 and 3, makes those images look 
really garish.


On the download page, Zope 2 should be above Zope 3.

Like everything else :-)

I was also thinking that there should be a discussion board on the site 
like Apple's support boards. Many of the support questions answered on 
Apple's boards are from other customers. It's a nice one stop shop for 
questions and answers for those who may not want to subscribe to mailing 
list. It would be nice to have that option.

http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa


No, forums or mailing lists, not both.

Mailing lists are already there, so forums suck ;-)

A decent list of the lists available would rock, as would nice 
searchable archives. However, google and gmane take care of the latter 
requirement, which is hard to implement...


Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-23 Thread Tom Von Lahndorff



- I think fly out menus on Web pages just don't Feel Good (not to
  mention the debatable usability problems they might introduce[2]).


See Mike D.'s comments on that article which pretty  much sums up my 
rationale and implementation.


Still not convinced, but that's just me. We don't have such a deep 
structure or information density, I would simply put a context navigation 
on the left (or right) for each section but not on the homepage, like on 
this two pages:


http://www.mozilla.org/support/
http://www.mozilla.org/about/

Very simple.


Not really. Just the opposite actually, confusing. My design is certainly 
more simple than mozilla's. Inconsistent page layout. I like sites that 
have a consistent layout throughout, including the homepage. It's confusing 
when the navigation changes on a page by page basis. In my case there's no 
scheme that the user has to *get*.





Tonico

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web 


___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


Re: [ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-23 Thread Tonico Strasser

Tom Von Lahndorff schrieb:



- I think fly out menus on Web pages just don't Feel Good (not to
  mention the debatable usability problems they might introduce[2]).


See Mike D.'s comments on that article which pretty  much sums up my 
rationale and implementation.


Still not convinced, but that's just me. We don't have such a deep 
structure or information density, I would simply put a context 
navigation on the left (or right) for each section but not on the 
homepage, like on this two pages:


http://www.mozilla.org/support/
http://www.mozilla.org/about/

Very simple.


Not really. Just the opposite actually, confusing. My design is 
certainly more simple than mozilla's. Inconsistent page layout. I like 
sites that have a consistent layout throughout, including the homepage. 
It's confusing when the navigation changes on a page by page basis. In 
my case there's no scheme that the user has to *get*.


I agree that the consistency is a hight priority (nevertheless I find 
mozilla.org pretty user friendly).


I also think a *visible* 2nd level navigation is very important for 
orientation. Maybe we agree on the basic question of a random visitor on 
a Web site:


A) Where am I?

B) Where do I come from (or how did I come here)?

C) Where can I go from here?

To answer B the page must either have a navigation system in which the 
context is obvious, or at least a breadcrumb navigation trail.


If you have a visible 2nd (and maybe 3rd) level navigation the fly out 
menus become redundant. Note: I'm not saying that the navigation must 
change on different sections or that the fly out menus must be disabled 
to achieve this.


Tonico

___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web


[ZWeb] V3 Updated

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Von Lahndorff


http://www.modscape.com/zope

03/22/06. Updated the homepage. Added the Zope 3 box. Created a  
download page. Click on Download Zope under Download in the nav.


Thanks for all of the comments. Keep 'em coming. A couple of people  
had mentioned the background was a bit dark so I've lightened it. It  
seems though that people are pretty happy with the general look and  
feel of the layout. I'd like to start drilling down into content at  
this point and this where I'll really need people's feedback,  
especially editorially. I want to try and keep the content simple and  
not make the assumption that visitors know what Zope is and what it  
does.


I was also thinking that there should be a discussion board on the  
site like Apple's support boards. Many of the support questions  
answered on Apple's boards are from other customers. It's a nice one  
stop shop for questions and answers for those who may not want to  
subscribe to mailing list. It would be nice to have that option.

http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa
___
Zope-web maillist  -  Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web