Hi Denis,
On 10/18/2010 2:21 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
I introduced a drawRoundCap method. This eliminated the side argument from
the round join drawing, which made it easier to eliminate the trig function
calls. I did this by using dot products to compute cosines (which was possible
because now Str
Hi Denis,
On 10/19/2010 10:40 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
Actually, I wrote a simple program to make sure the radius of curvature
function was correct. I have attached it. It's not a proof, but I think
it is convincing. Just hold down the mouse button and move it horizontally.
This will change the t v
Hi Denis,
On 10/19/2010 10:40 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
ROCsq - I looked at the wikipedia article and it wasn't clear how it
directly related to your function since the article is dealing with
the curvature of a function graphed against its own t, but you are dealing
with 2 parametric equations comb
On 10/19/2010 10:38 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
Hi Jim.
If I haven't replied to a suggestion, that means I've implemented and
I thought it was a good idea, so I don't have anything to say about it.
That's mostly true too for me, but there are a couple that I might go
back to - I'll let you know whe
Hi Jim.
> line 249,257 - these corrections are exponential compared to the
> sample code on the wikipedia page - was that the "slight modification" that
> you mentioned in the comments?
That's right. This turned out to be necessary because a lot of the numbers
dealt with in this code are very lar
Hi Jim.
If I haven't replied to a suggestion, that means I've implemented and
I thought it was a good idea, so I don't have anything to say about it.
> line 238: If X0,Y0,XL,COUNT were bumped up by 1 then you could just
> reuse "SLOPE" from the linear indices - just a thought.
True, but I would
