The fix was integrated into jdk9-client.
Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/7ba90377c7f4
Thanks,
Dmitry
On 30/01/2017 11:53, Dmitry Batrak wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose a fix for JDK-8170950.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170950
webrev: http://cr.
> 13 февр. 2017 г., в 10:47, Dmitry Batrak
> написал(а):
>
> Could anyone else review this please?
+1
+1
Vadim
On 13/02/2017 20:52, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine, but I’am not an expert in this area.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173028
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8173028/
An off by-one bug in assigning remaining glyphs in the cluster to char indices
so that the zero adva
Looks fine, but I’am not an expert in this area.
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173028
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8173028/
>
> An off by-one bug in assigning remaining glyphs in the cluster to char indices
> so that the zero advance gets assigned to latin "a" and it is not
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173028
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8173028/
An off by-one bug in assigning remaining glyphs in the cluster to char
indices
so that the zero advance gets assigned to latin "a" and it is not a hit
anymore.
font/layout/swing text regression tests hav
Looks good to me.
Regards
Prasanta
Looks good.
On 10.02.2017 21:02, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170913
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8170913/
The EUDC font is now placed first in the list of fall backs, since
anyone who
has a EUDC font presumably wants the c
> Yes, we are aware this fixed it only for Oracle JDK.
> The bit I missed is that GeezaProInterface was then used on OpenJDK by
JRS.
> So we could add that as well.
> If you have any other fonts you think should be added to the tail of that
list we
> can add them too.
I ran JRSFontCreateFallbackFo
