On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:05:42 GMT, skodanda
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Could you please review a TEST_BUG fix for the JDK 16?
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248352
>
> Problem description: The test
> test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/ArabicDiacriticTest.java can potentially
Hi,
May I ask for a status on this please.
-Vipin Mv1/India/IBM wrote: -
To: Philip Race
From: Vipin Mv1/India/IBM
Date: 08/31/2020 05:52PM
Cc: 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 823
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 03:00:20 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer).
>
> Since you remove the @headful keyword, did you check that the test works fine
> via mach5? It will now select a
> completely different set of test systems.
Dear Sergey,
I did test my changes v
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:17:36 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252195
> is another one of the issues adding missing explicit no-args constructors in
> the desktop module.
>
> As well as being nested, these are all concrete, but protected, classes and
> so the co
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:01:57 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Could you please review a TEST_BUG fix for the JDK 16?
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248352
>>
>> Problem description: The test
>> test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/ArabicDiacriticTest.java can poten
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:05:42 GMT, skodanda
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Could you please review a TEST_BUG fix for the JDK 16?
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248352
>
> Problem description: The test
> test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/ArabicDiacriticTest.java can potentially
Hello All,
Could you please review a TEST_BUG fix for the JDK 16?
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248352
Problem description: The test
test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/ArabicDiacriticTest.java can potentially
leave the
frame open if it fails. If it were not for the frame, the t
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252195
is another one of the issues adding missing explicit no-args constructors in
the desktop module.
As well as being nested, these are all concrete, but protected, classes and so
the constructors
are protected.
CSR here https://bugs.openjdk.java.net