On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:04:49 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
> This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
> in the java.desktop module'. The
> following classes have had an explicit no-arg constructor added, with a
> protected access modifie
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:32:18 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
> This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
> in the java.desktop module'. The changes
> address the reliance on default constructors by adding in basic constructors
> in
.accessibility.util.AccessibilityListenerList
> - Default ctor on com.sun.java.accessibility.util.EventID
>
> specdiff:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ccleary/issues/webrevs-store/8250859/webrevs/webrev.00/specdiff/overview-summary.html
> bug:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/J
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:52:35 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> The CSR lists `com.sun.java.accessibility.util.SwingEventMonitor` as being
> changed, but I cannot find that class in
> this PR.
Changes to this class were indeed missing. This has now been addressed. Thanks
for spotting that!
-
This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
in the java.desktop module'. The
following classes have had an explicit no-arg constructor added, with a
protected access modifier and accompanying API
description:
- Default ctor on com.sun.java.accessibility.util.Swi
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:04:49 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
> This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
> in the java.desktop module'. The
> following classes have had an explicit no-arg constructor added, with a
> protected access modifie
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:27:46 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default
>> constructors in the java.desktop module'. The changes
>> address the reliance on default constructors by adding in basic constructors
>> in the following classes:
>> -
This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
in the java.desktop module'. The changes
address the reliance on default constructors by adding in basic constructors in
the following classes:
- java.awt.Image
- java.awt.PrintJob
- java.awt.font.GlyphVector
- java.aw
ected constructor: "Constructor for
subclasses to call":
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8250850/webrev.1/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/plaf/metal/MetalTheme.java.sdiff.html
Actually the current text is also fine to me, but looks like many
people use the text above as
Hello all,
Could someone please review my changes for JDK-8250855, 'Address
reliance on default constructors in the Java 2D APIs'? This issue
relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors in
the java.desktop module'. The changes address the reliance on default
constructor
10 matches
Mail list logo
