+1
-phil
On 10/27/2016 08:16 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Hi Jay,
It looks OK to me. It would be good also to see what Phil or others think.
Thanks,
Brian
On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:08 AM, Jayathirth D V
mailto:jayathirth@oracle.com>> wrote:
Thanks for your inputs.
I have updated the web
Hi Jay,
It looks OK to me. It would be good also to see what Phil or others think.
Thanks,
Brian
On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:08 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs.
> I have updated the webrev to include updated hyperlink and copyright year.
> Please review it at your convenience:
>
/~jdv/8168609/javadoc.01/package.html
Thanks,
Jay
From: Brian Burkhalter
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:44 PM
To: Jayathirth D V
Cc: Philip Race; Vadim Pakhnushev; 2d-dev
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-8168609: No link to BMP specification
in javax.imageio package
Hi Jay,
Note that [1] use the same link minus the version number [2]. I wonder whether
it would be better to do that?
Also I noticed that I forgot to update the copyright year when I checked in the
same file yesterday so you might want to update it now.
Thanks,
Brian
[1] http://www.digitalpr
Hello All,
Please review the following api-doc-only change to the javax.imageio package
summary in JDK9:
Bug :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168609
Webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/8168609/webrev.00/
