On 12/15/2014 11:48 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 12/12/14 5:35 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 12/12/2014 12:46 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that
were generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-80
On 12/12/14 5:35 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 12/12/2014 12:46 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that
were generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
Each "Suppress deprecations warnin
On 12/12/2014 20:46, Phil Race wrote:
:
2) Some significant fraction of all the warnings are for getPeer() :-
dev/jdk/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Container.java:821:
warning: [deprecation] getPeer() in Component has been deprecated
The issue here is that the deprecation javadoc ta
Hi Phil,
On 12/12/2014 12:46 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that
were generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
Each "Suppress deprecations warnings in foo" bug is linked to a "Fix
depre
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that were
generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
A couple of things I find 'unfortunate' are
1) In order to avoid a deprecation warning on one call/line of a 100
line method,
On 10/12/2014 00:41, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
In support of JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings
(http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212), which is targeted to JDK 9, please
review the large but straightforward set of changes in the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8066621.0/
So
On 12/10/2014 10:20 PM, Victor D'yakov wrote:
Do we need to split it to AWT, Swing and 2D?
I would not find that helpful.
The email is to 3 lists and its not clear who would pick up reviewing it.
I assume the people in each are would review their piece of the change.
Also please use "cli
Do we need to split it to AWT, Swing and 2D?
The email is to 3 lists and its not clear who would pick up reviewing it.
Also please use "client" forest this is our repo for pre-integration
testing all together with Client SQE we are following to avoid
regression cases.
Victor
On 10.12.2014 3:
Hello,
In support of JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings
(http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212), which is targeted to JDK 9, please
review the large but straightforward set of changes in the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8066621.0/
Some background of the approach being tak