wow-
who pooped in your wheaties this morning?
flamebait
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i swear i almost agree with that.
big suprise there. that was the dumbest thing ive read on
i swear i almost agree with that.
sampling is a valid artform, but i don't think most of my favorite artists
do sample other music.
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Learn hoq to make your own music or pay the guy that went thru all the
trouble to get it out there. Sampling is
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i swear i almost agree with that.
big suprise there. that was the dumbest thing ive read on this
list that didnt come out of your mouth. or fingers, as the case
may be.
tom
-- Original Message --
From: Redmond, Ja'Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How many of you actually use samples in your music. I'm just
curious.
i jack drum hits and thats it. no loops, just hits. ive ripped
little tiny vocal bits before, but they were meant to be
-- Original Message --
From: Maarten Baute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ofcourse, all this sampling causes a lot of noise in the
background, wich is
GREAT. That way, I don´t have to add a noise channel myself ;-)
I like my stuff a bit dirty.
i like it dirty too. i
it's illegal, but unenforceable.
anyway, i like doing things that are illegal
my country was founded by criminals. our de facto national anthem is about
a sheep-stealing vagabond. our national hero is a bank robbing bushranger.
i've always preferred an illegal warehouse party to a legal night
Learn hoq to make your own music or pay the guy that went thru all the trouble
to get it out there. Sampling is stealing. It's not paying tribute, or
showing respect. Maybe if you were sampling and giving away your music, but
you are not. You are struggling just like the guy you sampled
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
Learn hoq to make your own music or pay the guy that went thru all the trouble
to get it out there. Sampling is stealing. It's not paying tribute, or
showing respect. Maybe if you were sampling and giving away your music, but
you
containing uncleared (but
unrecognizable) samples.
how on earth would they ever catch you?
surely it's virtually impossible right?
I don't see what this law changes that much.
But then I always miss the point.
No jokes today 313 I promise, although I do have a bit of a hangover.
So might go a
my country was founded by criminals.
our national hero is a bank robbing bushranger.
our de facto national anthem is about
a sheep-stealing vagabond
Oh man.
I'm loving it here already today.
I've tried to point this out to several Aussies James.
Only thing it ever got me was a black eye.
the way i see it, there is nothing new to this judgement.
every musical piece is subject to several rights.
the composition of the music is protected by copyright / droit d'auteur;
the text of the vocals is also protected by copyright / droit d'auteur (so
you can have several copyright owners
PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
Learn hoq to make your own music or pay the guy that went thru all
the trouble to get it out there. Sampling is stealing. It's not
paying tribute, or showing respect. Maybe if you were sampling
and giving away
The new ruling basically says that samples of ANY length need to be
licensed.
So you could, for example, take a recording, and make notes out of single
cycle samples, and it would be illegal.
they already cant enforce the laws that exist today
How many of you actually use samples in your
On Sep 9, 2004, at 4:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how on earth would they ever catch you?
surely it's virtually impossible right?
Since so many people have been asking this:
There is probably some watermarking algorithm that can be mixed with an
audio signal. It would repeat a lot throughout
I think it would be almost impossible to come up with a watermark for
audio that couldn't easily be blurred beyond recognition by fx, granular
sampling, changing bitrate etc ...
I read an article somewhere citing that previous attempts at digital
watermarking on audio have proved to be
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:05:55 -0400, Matt Kane's Brain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 9, 2004, at 4:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how on earth would they ever catch you?
surely it's virtually impossible right?
Since so many people have been asking this:
There is probably some watermarking
Subject: Re: (313) All
Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
09/09/2004 06:05
-- Original Message --
From: Pascoe Mr S M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it would be almost impossible to come up with a watermark
for
audio that couldn't easily be blurred beyond recognition by fx,
granular
sampling, changing bitrate etc ...
I read an
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only reason you hate this ruling so much is that now you
realize your own creative level is almost non existent, and youre
screwed
whats it like being green with warts living under a bridge?
tom
The only reason you hate this ruling so much is that now you
realize your own creative level is almost non existent, and youre
screwed
ha!
I missed this comment!
Surely you're not suggesting for example that, say, Carl Craig is not
creative?
He doesn't do that much with his samples.
Alex
-based but disguised so well we're not even
aware of it, even if we are familiar with the original work.
- jobot
- Original Message -
From: J.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 9, 2004 2:45 am
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
this is like a right-wing
@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
well said, J.T. I knew somebody else on the list would voice my opinion before
I got a chance.
The granularity in today's music production software such as Ableton and
Cubase, coupled with both software and outboard hardware
http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=43259
What a bunch of killjoys they are in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
This is a call to arms: Everyone needs to make a track made ENTIRELY
of uncleared samples. The new ruling basically says that samples of
ANY length need to be
-- Original Message --
From: Kent Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=43259
What a bunch of killjoys they are in the 6th Circuit Court of
Appeals.
This is a call to arms: Everyone needs to make a track made
the hell out of myself and my
environment.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:18 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
-- Original Message
environment.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:18 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
-- Original Message --
From
How many of you actually use samples in your music. I'm just curious.
EVERY sound I use in my productions is a sample! I mostly sample single
notes from soul/funk/disco/jazz/krautrock/postpunk records. I am now making
a record with an organ key of a herbie hancock song, a clap from body
music by
From: Maarten Baute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EVERY sound I use in my productions is a sample! I mostly sample single
notes from soul/funk/disco/jazz/krautrock/postpunk records. I am now
making
a record with an organ key of a herbie hancock song, a clap from body
music by the strikers, a kick from an
On Sep 8, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Maarten Baute wrote:
EVERY sound I use in my productions is a sample! I mostly sample single
notes from soul/funk/disco/jazz/krautrock/postpunk records. I am now
making
a record with an organ key of a herbie hancock song, a clap from body
music by the strikers, a
29 matches
Mail list logo
