Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
omcast.net> cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
> Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) Let's not dis the New Romantics, now. How else would we have gotten Frequency 7? Or Atom and the Ants :-) jeff (Dirk isn't the only one wearing white sox)

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Ian
On 6/16/03 1:04 PM, "The REAL Mxyzptlk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) Let's not dis the New Romantics, now. How else would we have gotten Frequency 7? Back on topic, -- im

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
omcast.net> cc: > Subject: RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd > 06/16/03 12:04 PM re-post) > > > > > > > wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and > placing fake birthmarks over the

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
L Mxyzptlk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313@hyperreal.org omcast.net> cc: Subject: RE: (313) and now - a chee

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and placing fake birthmarks over their lips. At 10:36 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote: It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number? Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) jeff

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
ot;David Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lnoize.com> cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) and now

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and placing fake birthmarks over their lips. I was doing this WAY before it was cool. jeff

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread David Powers
Wow you just discovered an incredible new way to market classical music!!! dave >>>MEK wrote: that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the recent "electro" revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and focus on those years? To be into the music, why do peopl

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-14 Thread spacecrusher
I think the big irritating thing about the electro "revival" is that the fashion oriented way people get all concerned about it being a trend in the first place. let me put it this way-there isn't anything stopping the producers, djs, and would be fans of Acid house to go make some acid house

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread yussel
who's to say that the acid house revival has to be the UK version? On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, rob wrote: > > The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an "Acid House Revival". > I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the > early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno,

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Matt Hellige
[Peter Leidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > and if an acid house revival means all the lame-asses around here > will start dancing again, then bring it on :)! AMEN. -- Matt Hellige [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://matt.immute.net

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Peter Leidy
> that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the > recent "electro" revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and > focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they > have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in? While "revi

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
>if 1000's of them think is the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured >hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting >"Accciiieeedd!!!" at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or >two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid Hou

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
That's cool, I guess what I meant was I love HEARING acid house music, but I hate 'official' revivals that the press/style arses get hold of and abuse. I love the old school nights as well, but to be honest I'd hate it if loads of kids started wearing the old kind of dress, I just think 'get a new

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread rob
The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an "Acid House Revival". I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread yussel
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Sakari Karipuro wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 13 Jun 2003 about following: > > > i called that about a year ago. acid is the next logical retro-sound after > > electro is played out. > > yeah, same here. waiting for hip-house.. then breakbeat-house/rave.. erm.. I

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Eric Scuccimarra
And remember the electro revival of the mid-90s? As I said I've sat through two electro and acid-house revivals (assuming that an acid house revival is underway or will be shortly). It all just seems to go around and around. At 07:22 PM 6/13/2003 +0300, Sakari Karipuro wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Sakari Karipuro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 13 Jun 2003 about following: > i called that about a year ago. acid is the next logical retro-sound after > electro is played out. yeah, same here. waiting for hip-house.. then breakbeat-house/rave.. erm.. > unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way e

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Matt Hellige wrote: > > [Fabrizio Nahum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > i guess we agree on this :) > > > > i cant wait for the early-to-midnineties-uk-melodictechno-revival! i think > > it will be a little hard to market though ;) > > > > And I can't wait for the "Kanzleramt: the early years" revival!

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Eric Scuccimarra
i'm a year late then :-( - Original Message - From: "Eric Scuccimarra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:20 PM Subject: Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question > About a year ago I was playing a set and as usual was playing

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
so i guess i'm a year late then :-( - Original Message - From: "Eric Scuccimarra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:20 PM Subject: Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question > About a year ago I was playing a set and

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Eric Scuccimarra
About a year ago I was playing a set and as usual was playing a ton of acid house and a friend of mine from Williamsburg, Brooklyn came up to me and said "I guess you've heard that acid house is the new electro." In fact I hadn't, but that sounded about right. At 11:02 AM 6/13/2003 -0400, [EMA

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Matt Hellige
[Fabrizio Nahum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > i guess we agree on this :) > > i cant wait for the early-to-midnineties-uk-melodictechno-revival! i think > it will be a little hard to market though ;) > And I can't wait for the "Kanzleramt: the early years" revival! Revival fever! > - Original Mess

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
perreal.org> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:02 PM Subject: Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question > i called that about a year ago. acid is the next logical retro-sound after > electro is played out. > > unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but, i > do re

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread yussel
i called that about a year ago. acid is the next logical retro-sound after electro is played out. unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but, i do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called hacienda (i think it failed) at the rate things are goin

(313) and now - a cheeky question

2003-06-13 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
is acid house the purists' (us) 80s revival? as opposed to all the electoclash/no-wave/new wave/gigolo/dirtydisco hype? i know there isnt much to talk about really, but what do you guys think? ive been thinking about this alot lately, also cuz ive been buying some old trax records and im hearing a