[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> your name appeared because i was originally replying to your post about
> the changing definition of hipsters.
>
> guess that got lost
>
> TP1 and TP2?
>
> which one is which?
Who cares?
--
Matt Hellige [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was a good post Yussell.
Everytime someone explains themselves in full,
I find myself agreeing.
One thing though.
>>I AM a tastemaker
Just remind me to poke myself in the eye with a rusty gate post if I ever
let any media publication dictate my taste.
Thank you.
Alex
_
with image ... it's that their interests are
> varied and they genuinely get bored with the same old same old, thus always
> hunting down something 'new,' even if that 'new' is just an 'old'
> reconfigured ...
>
> cheers -
>
> lisa
>
&
s -
lisa
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 4:16 pm
Subject: (313) hipster techno (fwd)
>
> oops, turns out i let a naughty word slip. maybe that's why it wasn't
> going through.
>
> here's the post i was looking for
&g
your name appeared because i was originally replying to your post about
the changing definition of hipsters.
guess that got lost
TP1 and TP2?
which one is which?
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, chad cumby wrote:
> just to make it clear since my name showed up in Josh's manifesto..
> I'm NOT a tastemaker
just to make it clear since my name showed up in Josh's manifesto..
I'm NOT a tastemaker, nor a professional.
but I'm happy to weigh in on any important question that might discriminate
me into my correct cluster. Mathew Jonson - YES. UR - YES/NO. KDJ - YES.
TP1 - YES. TP2 - NO/YES. Jeff
oops, turns out i let a naughty word slip. maybe that's why it wasn't
going through.
here's the post i was looking for
---
interesting point chad (and how long have you been lurking around here)
i think the difference is that since the day of our parents/teac
