performed very nicely
live I might add.
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:05 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) LFO singles from Advance
What singles were released off the Advance LP?
So far I see on disco
What singles were released off the Advance LP?
So far I see on discogs.com:
Tied Up
...and that's about it.
Were there no 12" of any of the other tracks?
MEK
duh! might help if i added the link...
http://downloads.warprecords.com/lfo/LFO_FREAK.mov
==
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain sensitive and
private proprietary or legally privileged informati
try this link direct to the file:
-Original Message-
From: George Emsies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 11:16
To: ed612313
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) lfo video
hi,
not sure if it is only me, but this link is not working for me. Has anyone
else
hi,
not sure if it is only me, but this link is not working for me. Has anyone
else experienced the same problem?
ciao
g
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, ed612313 wrote:
> Lfo - Freak (#WAP166) Warp 2003 VIDEO
>
> http://www.welovetechno.be/modulesiewtopic&t=1161
>
> ed
>
Lfo - Freak (#WAP166) Warp 2003 VIDEO
http://www.welovetechno.be/modulesiewtopic&t=1161
ed
At 20:08 11-9-2003, you wrote:
New LFO site
http://www.warprecords.com/lfo/
Thanx!
Did some deeplinking again:
http://downloads.warprecords.com/lfo/LFO_FREAK.mov
Enjoy the video =)
R.
---
http://www.funxiun.com
.dark.elektronix.
New LFO site
http://www.warprecords.com/lfo/
At 15:40 3-8-2003, you wrote:
Is there a release date for this? I'm rather excited to hear it myself.
More info about the releasedate:
http://www.warprecords.com/news/?offset=0&ti_id=639
R.
---
http://www.funxiun.com
.dark.elektronix.
Southern Outpost wrote:
Just got a promo copy of the new LFO single called Freak. I gotta tell
ya, Mark Bell hasn't lost it!
Pretty tough, pretty loud... fans of LFO's original stuff will enjoy
this. It'll do well out on the floor. Can't wait to test it out.
Is there a release date for thi
Just got a promo copy of the new LFO single called Freak. I gotta tell
ya, Mark Bell hasn't lost it!
Pretty tough, pretty loud... fans of LFO's original stuff will enjoy
this. It'll do well out on the floor. Can't wait to test it out.
Peace,
Patrick.
-
EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313@hyperreal.org
gy.net> cc:
Comparing today's music to techno from 10 or 15 years ago is like
comparing
the original Star Wars Trilogy to the newer movies like Episode 1.
Is newer better? well no because in this case newer technology was not
utilized correctly to
improve on an old concept which had room for some improveme
Techno is basically a late 80's early 90's music genre, it's like
"electro".
ahh you're one of those people who encapsulates music to a specific time
period. like, jazz is a 1920's genre. rock is 1950's. techno, 1980's. but
then you talk about progress, innovation and improvement - -i dont see
--- Matthew MacQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks over
> and over? I don't buy it. While diehard fans might want an artist to
> stay in their personal favorite period (to your ears 'the best' period)
> forever, the vanguard artist
They can still be "LFO" without putting out "the same old stuff"
On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 19:48 America/Detroit, Matthew MacQueen
wrote:
because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance
music.
To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks
over
and over?
-- Original Message --
From: spw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music.
>How about using some of the same concepts bleep and bassline
sound instead of 'rehashing' with out
>making it sound like stupid tech-house
> because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance
> music.
To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks over
and over? I don't buy it. While diehard fans might want an artist to
stay in their personal favorite period (to your ears 'the best' period)
forever, the
> But LFO is no longer a duo, and hasn't been for ages. It's rediculous to
> expect him to rehash what he was doing over a decade ago.
because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music.
How about using some of the same concepts bleep and bassline sound instead of
'rehashing' with ou
- Original Message -
From: "spw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back!
> don't be ridiculous, LFO Frequencies was the best album by the duo.
But LFO is no longer a duo,
don't be ridiculous, LFO Frequencies was the best album by the duo.
--- Phonopsia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "spw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:41 AM
> Subj
> It would be like Hawtin using the Plastikman moniker to do FUSE stuff
> or vice-versa.
>
wait- there's a difference? ;)
>
> >> On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines
> >> and
> > old school technoid
> >> flavor.
> >
> >
> > It doesn't. He already did that album
There is no point in doing "LFO" again if they are not going to do
"LFO" again(at least in a similar vein).
If they are going to do something else then it would probably be a good
idea to use a different moniker since LFO is so, well, LFO
It would be like Hawtin using the Plastikman moniker t
- Original Message -
From: "spw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back!
> On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines and
old school technoid
> flavor.
It
> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rob Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:00 AM
> Subject: (313) LFO are back!
>
>
> >morning all,
> >
> >some v.good news, straight from the horse's
Rob Webb wrote:
morning all,
some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth:
http://www.warprecords.com.
"The long awaited new album from LFO is here. 'Sheath' is released on
22nd September 2003, preceded by a single in August that will make you
'Freak'."
Rob
All i can say is wow. I
you're going to run around naked?
:x
:D
- Original Message -
From: "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rob Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back!
> - Orig
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:00 AM
Subject: (313) LFO are back!
>morning all,
>
>some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth:
>http://www.warprecords.com.
&
Hey that's gay, I'm great news!
It's about time.
--- Rob Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> morning all,
>
> some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth:
> http://www.warprecords.com.
>
> "The long awaited new album from LFO is here. 'Sheath' is released on
> 22nd September 2003, preceded b
morning all,
some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth:
http://www.warprecords.com.
"The long awaited new album from LFO is here. 'Sheath' is released on
22nd September 2003, preceded by a single in August that will make you
'Freak'."
Rob
Yes...the LFO name refers to one member only.Mark Bell
- Original Message -
From: "Gwendal Cobert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:14 PM
Subject: RE: [313] LFO: We are back?
> yup - looks like part of the War
yup - looks like part of the Warp Bus tour to me... these are all Warp
artists, and this the real LFO, at least 50% of it.
Gwendal
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:03 PM
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Sub
LFO, RADIOACTIVE MAN, RICHARD DEVINE, CHRIS CLARK, DJ EASE & OTHERS Metro,
8/2 [chicago]
Anyone know if this is the real LFO and not that crappy boy band?
I assumed it was the boy band, but it does seem odd that they'd be at Metro
on this particular bill. Have the kids finally dissed them leavi
what's it sound like??
on 19/4/02 4:33 am, Ohrwurm at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what's this LFO white I've seen..?.. Title is some guy's name(?) and
> numbered LFO 001...
> The shop had it under "House"; but scratched that and now it's a "Trance"
> record...
>
> n.p.: A Certain Ratio "Ear
... what's this LFO white I've seen..?.. Title is some guy's name(?) and
numbered LFO 001...
The shop had it under "House"; but scratched that and now it's a "Trance"
record...
n.p.: A Certain Ratio "Early" (... Soul Jazz, again.)
J.E. v.F-B. B.
--
mark bell is listed in the production credits, albeit minimally.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Mann, Ravinder [CCS]
Cc: 'Jongsma, K.J.'; '313@hyperreal.org'
Subject: RE: [313] LFO Back
Jongsma, K.J. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:30 PM
> > To: '313@hyperreal.org'
> > Subject:[313] LFO Back together?
> >
> > Wow, does this mean they are back together? From wath i have heard they both
> > stopped w
that's LSG
(Gerald) Levert, (Keith) Sweat, (Johnny) Gill
--brian
-Original Message-
From: Phonopsia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] LFO Again...
- Original Message -
From: &qu
- Original Message -
From: "Gwendal Cobert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: [313] LFO Again...
> > There was some talk on this list about LFO a few days back. I
> > just read
> > so
which brings up the question : is Bell dating Carmen Electra ?
And to re-focus on 313 : "Super Collider to support Jeff Mills" : "Keep an
eye out for Jamie's London show with his band Super_Collider where they will
warm-up for Jeff Mills at the Rough Trade 'Ether' festival at the Royal
Festival Hal
despite the existence of "lyte funky ones," the rock boy band, mark bell IS
working on a new LFO album. it's on the warp web site.
brian
-Original Message-
From: Gwendal Cobert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:46 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject
> There was some talk on this list about LFO a few days back. I
> just read
> somewhere about a new album release from a british band
> called LFO. It turns
> out that the record industry just created another
> we-would-like-to-be-cool-and-make-a-lot-of-money rock act
> which is also
> called LFO.
plus there is that LFO that was a one-hit boy-band with the "i like girls
that wear abercrombie and fitch" song.
-Original Message-
From: Jongsma, K.J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:45 AM
To: '313@hyperreal.org'
Subject: [313] LFO Again
Hi,
There was some talk on this list about LFO a few days back. I just read
somewhere about a new album release from a british band called LFO. It turns
out that the record industry just created another
we-would-like-to-be-cool-and-make-a-lot-of-money rock act which is also
called LFO. Back to lis
Im sorry my friends but i had a fever last night so i couldn't make it to
the LFO gig.
Apprently Mark Bell was the only guy playing as he is the owner of the name
LFO; Gez Varley is indeed G-Man
sorry
fab.
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
> Wow, does this mean they are back together? From wath i have heard
they both
> stopped working together because of some not-so-pleasant-things.
Mark Bell
> started producing the big shots (Bjork, Depeche Mode) and Gez was
doing that
> G-Man thing.
witch is briliant!!
henrique casanova
S.
What kind of Dj set would they likely play i wonder too ?
Rav
> -Original Message-
> From: Jongsma, K.J. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:30 PM
> To: '313@hyperreal.org'
> Subject: [313] LFO Back together?
>
> Wow, does this me
Wow, does this mean they are back together? From wath i have heard they both
stopped working together because of some not-so-pleasant-things. Mark Bell
started producing the big shots (Bjork, Depeche Mode) and Gez was doing that
G-Man thing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you are very lucky!!!
>
> LFO ,
> Errr? Gez has been quite prolific over the past several years.
>
> .Or am I just missing the context of the comment?
Not that he hasn't done a lot of great tracks, just that he's doing "that"
sound for "that" label. Sounding a little old to my ears, that's all --
chalk it up to Monday morn
>Unfortunately, the black hole known as
> Force Inc has claimed yet another producer...
Errr? Gez has been quite prolific over the past several years. At least 5
12"s that I can think of off of the top of my head, and two full length
releases.Or am I just missing the context of the comment?
> > : "(Mark and Gez have since parted company - Mark
> > : remaining as LFO and Gez recording solely as G Man.
>
> Don't forget Gez's several releases as himself: Presents Tony Montana on !K7
> and the just-released Bayou Paradis. Unfortunately, the black hole known as
> Force Inc has claimed ye
> : "(Mark and Gez have since parted company - Mark
> : remaining as LFO and Gez recording solely as G Man.
Don't forget Gez's several releases as himself: Presents Tony Montana on !K7
and the just-released Bayou Paradis. Unfortunately, the black hole known as
Force Inc has claimed yet another pr
:::It took me a year to track down another copy of "LFO" (first one
:::was stilen
:::when my car was broken into some years ago). Found it in a used
:::music shop
:::here in Ann Arbor. Try second hand stores in your area.
it also seems to get released on reactivate compilations (vinyl & cd) every
05:16:48 AM
To: "'Gary Girard'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313@hyperreal.org
cc:
Subject: RE: [313] LFO
abum version is widley available from most uk outlets - virgin, hmv for
£9.99 last time I looked
LFO : Frequencies : Warp : WARPCD3
> -Original Me
You can find and order it directly from the WARP siteamong with other
back catalog goodies
fab
abum version is widley available from most uk outlets - virgin, hmv for £9.99
last time I looked
LFO : Frequencies : Warp : WARPCD3
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Girard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
>
> My girlfr
I'm thinking maybe "love is the message" by MFSB (mother father sister
brother). 70's disco soul stuff. But I could be wrong because I'm not sure
if I know this LFO track.
_joe
Responding To:"Peter T. Bense" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original Date:Sun, 05 Mar 2000 05:43:13 -0500
>
> Where di
Where did they sample the vocals in this?
the "love is the message" one, of course...
any clues?
/peter
58 matches
Mail list logo
