Ian wrote:
On 6/5/02 9:00 AM, Toby Frith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, what's to say that techno has to have soul or funk - why can't we
have some industrial sounding stuff?
We can, but then it wouldn't be called techno.
Yeah, it would be called IDM :) Seriously, AFX, Autechre, and
On 6/5/02 9:00 AM, Toby Frith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, what's to say that techno has to have soul or funk - why can't we
have some industrial sounding stuff?
We can, but then it wouldn't be called techno. Soul or funk are
defining elements of techno in my understanding.
That said, I'm
Ian wrote on Wed, 5 Jun 2002 about following:
That said, I'm waiting for the EBM revival to rise out of this
electro-clash business. Front 242/Nitzer Ebb cover band, anyone?
actually front 242 instrumentals (although i definitely like the
vocal versions) are pretty good mixing stuff..
] Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to
Hawtin?)
Ian wrote on Wed, 5 Jun 2002 about following:
That said, I'm waiting for the EBM revival to rise out of this
electro-clash business. Front 242/Nitzer Ebb cover band, anyone?
actually front 242 instrumentals (although i
- Original Message -
From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [313] Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to
Hawtin?)
Ian wrote on Wed, 5 Jun 2002 about following:
That said, I'm waiting for the EBM
Ian wrote on Wed, 5 Jun 2002 about following:
That said, I'm waiting for the EBM revival to rise out of this
electro-clash business. Front 242/Nitzer Ebb cover band, anyone?
actually rethinking this i remembered that O.H.G.R already crossed over
electro-clash and ebm on their previous (and
:
Subject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
06/05/02 09:04 AM
nope, the immediate future is electro and micro*.*
both are considered trendy among those who need to be trendy to be part
mi.net cc:
Subject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
06/05/02 09:04 AM
nope, the immediate future is electro and micro*.*
both are considered trendy among those who
mi.net cc:
Subject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
06/05/02 09:04 AM
nope, the immediate future is electro and micro*.*
both
cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
06/05/02 11:39 AM
06/05/02 11:16 AMSubject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
and there you go, narrowly defining a word to only fit what you like.
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hold on now - electro is not trendy - *Elektroclash
]
cc: 313@hyperreal.org
06/05/02 11:57 AMSubject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 313@hyperreal.org
06/05/02 11:57 AMSubject: Re: [313]
Techno/Industrial (was Re: [313] Does anyone compare to Hawtin?)
i am not having this thread again
13 matches
Mail list logo
