RE: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-10 Thread spw
--- Matthew MacQueen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks over and over? I don't buy it. While diehard fans might want an artist to stay in their personal favorite period (to your ears 'the best' period) forever, the vanguard artists

RE: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-10 Thread J. T.
Techno is basically a late 80's early 90's music genre, it's like electro. ahh you're one of those people who encapsulates music to a specific time period. like, jazz is a 1920's genre. rock is 1950's. techno, 1980's. but then you talk about progress, innovation and improvement - -i dont see

RE: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-10 Thread J. T.
Comparing today's music to techno from 10 or 15 years ago is like comparing the original Star Wars Trilogy to the newer movies like Episode 1. Is newer better? well no because in this case newer technology was not utilized correctly to improve on an old concept which had room for some

RE: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-10 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
cc: Subject: RE: (313) LFO are back! 07/10/03 08:37 AM

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-09 Thread spw
But LFO is no longer a duo, and hasn't been for ages. It's rediculous to expect him to rehash what he was doing over a decade ago. because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music. How about using some of the same concepts bleep and bassline sound instead of 'rehashing' with out

RE: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-09 Thread Matthew MacQueen
because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music. To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks over and over? I don't buy it. While diehard fans might want an artist to stay in their personal favorite period (to your ears 'the best' period) forever, the

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-09 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: spw [EMAIL PROTECTED] because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music. How about using some of the same concepts bleep and bassline sound instead of 'rehashing' with out making it sound like stupid

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-09 Thread Adam H
They can still be LFO without putting out the same old stuff On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 19:48 America/Detroit, Matthew MacQueen wrote: because it sounds better that a lot of contemporary dance music. To you. So that is an excuse for LFO to keep making the same tracks over and over? I

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-08 Thread spw
don't be ridiculous, LFO Frequencies was the best album by the duo. --- Phonopsia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: spw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:41 AM Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back! It doesn't. He already did

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-08 Thread Phonopsia
- Original Message - From: spw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:30 PM Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back! don't be ridiculous, LFO Frequencies was the best album by the duo. But LFO is no longer a duo, and hasn't been for ages. It's rediculous

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-07 Thread spw
On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines and old school technoid flavor. S. Poindexter Hieroglyphic Being: My Life As A Skinny Puppy and some of the Robert Hood are probably the only records I like this year. --- Phonopsia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-07 Thread Phonopsia
- Original Message - From: spw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:41 AM Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back! On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines and old school technoid flavor. It doesn't. He already did that album

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-07 Thread Adam H
There is no point in doing LFO again if they are not going to do LFO again(at least in a similar vein). If they are going to do something else then it would probably be a good idea to use a different moniker since LFO is so, well, LFO It would be like Hawtin using the Plastikman moniker to

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-07 Thread yussel
It would be like Hawtin using the Plastikman moniker to do FUSE stuff or vice-versa. wait- there's a difference? ;) On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines and old school technoid flavor. It doesn't. He already did that album - what's wrong with

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-05 Thread Phonopsia
- Original Message - From: Rob Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:00 AM Subject: (313) LFO are back! morning all, some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth: http://www.warprecords.com. The long awaited new album from LFO is here.

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-05 Thread ::\)
you're going to run around naked? :x :D - Original Message - From: Phonopsia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rob Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:33 PM Subject: Re: (313) LFO are back! - Original Message - From: Rob Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-05 Thread Ramon Crespo
Rob Webb wrote: morning all, some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth: http://www.warprecords.com. The long awaited new album from LFO is here. 'Sheath' is released on 22nd September 2003, preceded by a single in August that will make you 'Freak'. Rob All i can say is wow.

Re: (313) LFO are back!

2003-07-04 Thread spw
Hey that's gay, I'm great news! It's about time. --- Rob Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: morning all, some v.good news, straight from the horse's mouth: http://www.warprecords.com. The long awaited new album from LFO is here. 'Sheath' is released on 22nd September 2003, preceded by a