RE: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-20 Thread yussel
olete or ...? > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 0:20 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: 313 > Onderwerp: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!) > > case by case basis i suppos

RE: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-20 Thread Peteri, Jochem
Rolls Royce -Original Message- From: Fabrizio Nahum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 20 april 2004 11:03 To: 313 Subject: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!) classic - Original Message - From: "Wibo Lammerts" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-20 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
classic - Original Message - From: "Wibo Lammerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "313" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: RE: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's a

RE: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-20 Thread Wibo Lammerts
Would you then consider an 909 drummachine to be oldschool, obsolete or ...? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 0:20 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: 313 Onderwerp: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-19 Thread yussel
To: Jason Brunton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: 313 > <313@hyperreal.org> > 04/19/04 04:17 PM Subject: Re: (313) London May > 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!) > > >

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-19 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
rreal.org> 04/19/04 04:17 PM Subject: Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it&#

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-19 Thread Jason Brunton
Ahhh, I see. Nothing wrong with a little polemic now and again though- a few catch phrases and slogans never hurt in the Detroit Techno arena before! cheers Jason On 19 Apr 2004, at 22:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no- play whatever you want. listen to whatever you want dance to whatever

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-19 Thread yussel
no- play whatever you want. listen to whatever you want dance to whatever you want. just don't use a catch-phrase to act like you're on some 'next' sh*t by playing old records. On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jason Brunton wrote: > Does this mean I (or anyone else) shouldn't play a record that's "old"

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-19 Thread Jason Brunton
Does this mean I (or anyone else) shouldn't play a record that's "old" even if I just heard it for the first time and it's "new" to me?? I play records that are good- I really don't care how old or new they are Jason On 16 Apr 2004, at 18:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're gonna go back i

Re: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-16 Thread yussel
> > We're gonna go back in order to go > forward. > Attention all techno everyones!!! Please stop using this excuse to be retro. You are not going fowward by playing old records. You are being retro- which is fine. But stop faking it.

RE: (313) London May 1 (Yeah ok, it's about 'Lost'!!)

2004-04-16 Thread Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
It gives big Kev a very good reason to be dropping "Big Fun" (not that he doesn't already.) Sounds like it wil be a much more eclectic night than either the straight Lost parties AND the Spacebase ones (which were "restricted" to music from "back in the day.") -Original Message- From: Ken