Yeah I've had similar strange reasons for rejection of comments from
discogs. Yet at the same time I've seen the most anodyne, wierd (i.e. not
particularly reflective of the music) or sometimes just plain idiot comments
on there!
I have had some comments passed - but again, the reasons why they
i tried to have to put acid pimp's first record up, chesire #1, it took them
4 months for them tell me the record did not excist. well i have this
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:27:54AM -0400, Scotto wrote:
i tried to have to put acid pimp's first record up, chesire #1, it took them
4 months for them tell me the record did not excist. well i have this
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other
It isn't in discogs, I have the red vinyl 12, not a 7.
Maybe you spelt chesire instead of Cheshire.
p
-Original Message-
From: Scotto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 10:28
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i tried to have to put
Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and
i don't have any figures but i think there's plenty of errors, and
the mods constantly tell to
forgot i had entered it. this was a while ago (1 1/2 yars
maybe??).
- Original Message -
From: placid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Scotto' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
It isn't in discogs, I
PROTECTED]
To: 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me
wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe
perhaps you should not say when I played to a crowd, and you should
instead say when played to a crowd of it was accepted openly.
I can see the line that they don't want to cross. If they allowed reviews
like that, they'd have every bedroom dj in teh world sliding in quips
about how good a
