On Nov 8, 2006, at 15:47, kent williams wrote:
Easy now, my little Vikings.
Pshaw, you're just jealous because we have cool hats and you don't.
(I originally wrote that as cool hates, hah)
This still does not answer Henrique's problem:
for some reason I never ever receive the original ema
Easy now, my little Vikings. People sometimes post stuff to 313, but
CC the guy to which they replied. Then, for one of 3 reasons, Ezmlm
bounces the message. But since someone who's on the list did see the
post, they reply to the list.
So in that situation, the post never hits the list, but po
On 8 Nov 2006, at 17:16, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But what's happening to Henrique C sounds too consistent for that?
i agree, i wasnt saying i thought that happened with all the posts
he's having a problem with, just this one that
So technically i can't see a prob with your email Francis, I'm
guessing you see no probs though now with your posts.
BUT It appears that Marcs first post was in plain text but not in
ASCII encoding (something like UTF encoding I can't recall).
Kent these are slipping through and only some
option to scan and unjunk any messages my spam filters weed out. I
do this twice a day. I never got it.
k
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kane's Brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@Hyperreal.Org
Subject: Re: (313) no
I didn't get it either. I've just turned off all SPAM filtering on this
address at my ISP so I'll see what happens going forward.
Don't SPAM me Mofos! ;)
Tristan
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phonopsia.co.uk
Right, but what about server-side filtering? There may be something
form your ISP that you can't see.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:54, Stoddard, Kamal wrote:
Naahhh. It happened to me as well with this post in particular and
I get
the option to scan and unjunk any messages my spam filters weed out
2006 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@Hyperreal.Org
Subject: Re: (313) not receiving first posts only replies
Any idea what your server-side spam filtering situation is? That's my
first inkling.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So it's obviously happened
Any idea what your server-side spam filtering situation is? That's my
first inkling.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's obviously happened again (as I never got Marc's post).
This is turning into a @%&"* nuisance. Come on you technical
lurkers - what gives with thi
