-- Original Message --
From: Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a load of crap. Actually doing something new and interesting
is not the
same thing as just saying you are going to. And lots of people
who really do
original interesting work might not be doing it
-- Original Message --
From: Dennis DeSantis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think Eno's point was just that new does not NECESSITATE
interesting - that is, he's suggesting that simply creating
original
work does not automatically assure that it is work of
understand why music sucks now.
Hilarious. I should mention, I heard music sucked yesterday, and I
heard from an even better source music will suck tomorrow, and possibly
even the next day.
judgement and sometimes aspire to piracy or
gunfighting, this is not necessarily a sign of success. **
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeSantis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 5:29 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) re: something to think about
I think
Stoddard, Kamal wrote:
I don't know, I think eno has a point. Originality should be a consequence of
an honest expression. Not a technical
acheivement. And I think originality can be achieved by building on already explored territories. When the goal to
be different eclipses the goal to be
313@hyperreal.org
Subject
Re: (313) re: something to think
about
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; Stoddard, Kamal
Subject: Re: (313) re: something to think about
Can someone point me directly to that LD thread please?
MEK
-Original Message-
From: Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2005 22:21
What a load of crap. Actually doing something new and
interesting is not the same thing as just saying you are
going to. And lots of people who really do original
interesting work might not
I think Eno's point was just that new does not NECESSITATE
interesting - that is, he's suggesting that simply creating original
work does not automatically assure that it is work of value/quality.
--
Dennis DeSantis
www.dennisdesantis.com
Philip wrote:
What a load of crap. Actually doing
