RE: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 January 2005 22:21 > > What a load of crap. Actually doing something new and > interesting is not the same thing as just saying you are > going to. And lots of people who really do original & > interesting work mi

RE: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Brendan Nelson
4 January 2005 16:19 > To: robin > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; Stoddard, Kamal > Subject: Re: (313) re: something to think about > > > > > > > Can someone point me directly to that LD thread please? > > MEK

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
cc 313@hyperreal.org Subject Re: (313) re: something to think

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread robin
Stoddard, Kamal wrote: I don't know, I think eno has a point. Originality should be a consequence of an honest expression. Not a technical acheivement. And I think originality can be achieved by building on already explored territories. When the goal to be different eclipses the goal to be your

RE: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Stoddard, Kamal
oted for mature judgement and sometimes aspire to piracy or gunfighting, this is not necessarily a sign of success. ** > -Original Message- > From: Dennis DeSantis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 5:29 PM > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) re: s

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Allen Goodman
understand why music sucks now. Hilarious. I should mention, I heard music sucked yesterday, and I heard from an even better source music will suck tomorrow, and possibly even the next day.

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: Dennis DeSantis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I think Eno's point was just that "new" does not NECESSITATE >"interesting" - that is, he's suggesting that simply creating original >work does not automatically assure that it is work of va

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: "Philip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >What a load of crap. Actually doing something new and interesting is not the >same thing as just saying you are going to. And lots of people who really do >original & interesting work might not be do

Re: (313) re: something to think about

2005-01-23 Thread Dennis DeSantis
I think Eno's point was just that "new" does not NECESSITATE "interesting" - that is, he's suggesting that simply creating original work does not automatically assure that it is work of value/quality. -- Dennis DeSantis www.dennisdesantis.com Philip wrote: What a load of crap. Actually doin