Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Tim Maughan
that goes second for me;) i only heard from 11 - when did it start? i was no where near a tape recorder though... he rocked (no surprise) and seemed tighter than i heard him last... on 22/5/02 10:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone listening to this right now

Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread s mcgill
, 2002 1:15 AM Subject: Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL that goes second for me;) i only heard from 11 - when did it start? i was no where near a tape recorder though... he rocked (no surprise) and seemed tighter than i heard him last... on 22/5/02 10:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Odeluga, Ken
Strange, I heard the start and thought he was very sloppy and mixed without fluency. I hope it got better, as I know he can. SM My tupp'nies: It'll always be a matter of opinion (imho, it started reasonably and got better). There was one unequivocal mistake at about 19' 25 ... but the fact that

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread rob webb
Ken: breakdown bit of spiel about Detroit, followed by the 'mf' bit - who was that btw? Didn't sound like JM) as i recall it's either Rob Hood or Alan Oldham. it's taken the Utrecht show on the world tour that UR did back in 1991 or 1992. the speech is featured in the intro section to UR

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Langsman, Marc
is that the Are you down with the underground ! bit ? :) -Original Message- From: rob webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:30 AM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL Ken: breakdown bit of spiel about Detroit, followed by the 'mf' bit

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Sean Creen
It's Rob Hood... as i recall it's either Rob Hood or Alan Oldham. it's taken the Utrecht show on the world tour that UR did back in 1991 or 1992. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread rob webb
Marc: is that the Are you down with the underground ! bit ? :) that's the one! :) if i had the 2 records to hand (i don't, they're at home) and i had the time (i don't, i'm at work) i'd transcribe the speeches and send them to the list. maybe this evening if i remember and can find the

Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Gary_Girard
I thought the mixing was sloppy as well although to be fair he seemed to be constantly in the mix. G - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Ian Cheshire
Maughan Subject: Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL I thought the mixing was sloppy as well although to be fair he seemed to be constantly in the mix. G - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-23 Thread Tim Maughan
:) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:16 To: s mcgill Cc: 313; Tim Maughan Subject: Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL I thought the mixing was sloppy as well although to be fair he seemed to be constantly in the mix. G

Re: [313] JEFF MILLS ON PEEL

2002-05-22 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
Anyone listening to this right now recording it? I just got on late so if you are drop me a line so I can send you my address for a copy. Please? MEK