Re: [313] The epistemology of techno

2000-06-15 Thread Hugh G. Blaze
Well, duh. Re: what is the definition of techno? One has to ask first, what is a definition? A definition is a label attached to a phenomena and it does not convey any attributes other than those relevant for the phenomenon under examination to have discriminative validity (I choose not to

Re: [313] The epistemology of techno

2000-06-15 Thread Phonopsia
, Québécois, online now. -Original Message- From: Otto Koppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 313@hyperreal.org Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:52 PM Subject: [313] The epistemology of techno Re: what is the definition of techno? One has to ask first, what is a definition? A definition

Re: [313] The epistemology of techno

2000-06-15 Thread Kent williams
The first bit seems to be in English Otto, but did you lapse into Dutch as you went on? A less discursive explication would be this: Words are signs to which we consensually attach meaning, as Roland Barthes was on about for so long. Barthes' contention was that control of the language is power,

RE: [313] The epistemology of techno

2000-06-15 Thread Scott MacInnis
Even broader, communication is the art and language is one of many media available. However, communication happens only on the part of the recipient, thus meaning is only assigned by the listener (or viewer or taster etc.) guided by genetics, social interaction, weather, mood, time of

RE: [313] The epistemology of techno

2000-06-15 Thread Scott MacInnis
Even broader, communication is the art and language is one of many media available. However, communication happens only on the part of the recipient, thus meaning is only assigned by the listener (or viewer or taster etc.) guided by genetics, social interaction, weather, mood, time of