Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult

[389-users] Announcing 389 Admin Server 1.1.38

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi
389 Admin Server 1.1.38 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-admin version 1.1.38 and 389-adminutil version 1.1.21. Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and Rawhide repositories. The new packages and versions are: * 389-admin-1.1.38-1

[389-users] Announcing 389 Console 1.1.9

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi
389 Console 1.1.9 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-console version 1.1.9, 389-ds-console version 1.2.10, 389-admin-console version 1.1.10, and idm-console-framework version 1.1.9. Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and Rawhide

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Robert Viduya
I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Robert Viduya
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Ted Strother
Hi Robert, Based on the changelog on our satellite server here are all the fixes beyond the base 1.2.11.15 Change Log * Tue Jan 20 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-50 - Release 1.2.11.15-50 - Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication (DS 47915, DS

[389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Juan Carlos Camargo
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with