Thanks, John.
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 8:48 PM, John DeSoi via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> The extra characters are the Byte Order Mark (BOM) - see the documentation. A
> BOM is useless with UTF-8, but there is no way to prevent 4D from inserting
> it when using TEXT TO DOCUMENT.
The extra characters are the Byte Order Mark (BOM) - see the documentation. A
BOM is useless with UTF-8, but there is no way to prevent 4D from inserting it
when using TEXT TO DOCUMENT.
I use this method instead:
C_TEXT($1;$2)
C_BLOB($blob)
TEXT TO BLOB($1;$blob;UTF8 text without length)
BLO
4D V15, on a Mac. Once this works, the PC version is next.
I have nine text files that contain java scripts. They contain the users
password (not my idea). The health authority has decided that each site (maybe
45+ users) must change their passwords. So, I did the following:
$MyRawDoc:=Document
Taking you back to JonokeMed days Dani circa ~ 2010. Jonoke did all of that so
we could know what was used or not. I used the results a lot.
Jody
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Dani Beaubien via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> Probably the easiest way to do this is to create a new
Many thanks, that was a silly oversight, explicitly saving to and moving to
the next record in the Approvals table fixes the problem.
I appreciate the suggestions for more efficient code!
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:52 PM npdennis wrote:
>
>
> // THIS DOESN'T work! it approves the records but does
> // THIS DOESN'T work! it approves the records but does append to the log
Try this loop instead, you need a save record in the loop, and since you are
saving each you don’t need the apply to selection and first record… the loop
below will take less execution time and only modify the records
You need to save each record:
[Approvals]log:=$new_line+$current_log
SAVE RECORD([Approvals])
NEXT RECORD
and, of note, just a bare NEXT RECORD command assume that [Approvals] is the
default table. It might not be.
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Noah via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
Thank you all for the quick feedback!
The approvals table has all records with Approved defaulting to False.
The problem was with not including Set Channel (which is not really what I
wanted to be doing anyways). I must have taken a fork in the road (while
reading the documentation this morning) w
I see what you are saying, I will look at that as an alternative. Thanks
however...
the method called from exiting the program (menu_Quit)
runs the loop over the processes
For count processes
resume process
call process
BEFORE calling Quit 4D, to allow all the processes to complete whatever
OK If you are going to do this, why not go all the way
C_LonGINT($RECORDSINTABLE;$ALLRECORDS;$NOTAPPROVED;$APPROVED)
$RECORDSINTABLE:=RECORDS IN TABLE([Approvals])
> ALL RECORDS([Approvals])
> ALLRECORDS:= Records in selection([Approvals])
SET QUERY DESTINATION(INTO VARIABLE;$NOTAPPROVED)
QUERY([A
Probably the easiest way to do this is to create a new table and and create a
new row per event. Easy to conceptualize and easy to implement. And you can
then run queries against it easily.
For feature requests, it can help if you know that a feature request is being
made against an area that i
Chip,
Here is the documentation for “Process Aborted”:
The Process aborted command returns True if the process in which it is called
is about to be interrupted unexpectedly, which means that the execution of the
command was unable to reach its “normal” completion. For example, this can
occur a
Tom, can you give us an idea what/how this data is tabulated and how it’s
reported back to you?
Thanks,
Rob
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 3:07 PM, Benedict, Tom wrote:
>
> We don’t keep track of features used, but we do keep track of performance
> metrics, mostly around system re
Dani, how might the app be reporting this data back to the mothership? Imagine,
4D client server not a web app.
Also, how would this help with feature requests...? Wouldn’t you need the
feature available to the user before you could track it?
Thanks,
Rob
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2018
Robert writes:
> in your 4D applications are you tracking usage levels of any kind? I suppose
> it
>would be useful to know what features are heavily used and which are almost
>never used. What metrics does your system collect that you've found useful?
We don't keep track of features used, but w
Chip,
My thoughts exactly...
Steve
-Original Message-
From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Chip Scheide
via 4D_Tech
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 2:56 PM
To: 4D iNug Technical <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
Cc: Chip Scheide <4d_o...@pghrepository.org>
Subject: Re: Qu
Thanks Dani, that’s very helpful.
Rob
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Dani Beaubien
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert, since you are talking about usage patterns I suggest you approach
> it from the actions that your user’s are performing.
***
so.. an IP var in an object :)
Thanks!
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:33:15 -0500, Keith Culotta via 4D_Tech wrote:
> If using v17, shared Storage solves the problem. It takes the place
> of IP vars.
>
http://livedoc.4d.com/4D-Language-Reference-17/Objects-Language/Storage.301-3730714.en.html
>
>
Dani,
a 'Deamon" - a unix/linux term I believe - is a piece of code which
once started does a task and then goes to sleep for a while then wakes
up and does the task again.
for example, watching a specific folder for additions, then processing
the 'new' files.
These tasks do not not normally ex
If using v17, shared Storage solves the problem. It takes the place of IP vars.
http://livedoc.4d.com/4D-Language-Reference-17/Objects-Language/Storage.301-3730714.en.html
//
// Method: setQuit
// INPUT1: Boolean - Quit?
// ---
Have you looked at the 4d command "Process aborted”?
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> My Question is:
> How are you signaling to your stored procedures (Deamons) that the user
> is existing, without using an IP var?
>
> Currently I am
My Question is:
How are you signaling to your stored procedures (Deamons) that the user
is existing, without using an IP var?
Currently I am using an IP Var which is set in the Quit method.
This IP var is referenced in all of my 'Deamons' in a repeat loop
Repeat
// do deamon stuff
until (<>f_Q
Since you encountering more records than expected, do all records in the table
“Approval” have False assigned assigned to the field “approved”?
Try this in your method:
ALL RECORDS([Approvals])
$count_all := Records in selection([Approvals])
QUERY([Approvals];[Approvals]approved=False)
$count_q
Hi Robert, since you are talking about usage patterns I suggest you approach it
from the actions that your user’s are performing. This can help you understand
what the users are doing most along with some context.
A good place to start would be to track every time the user
- Selects a menu item
I just learned that Facebook is getting rid of a few apps, partially based on
low usage. So, in your 4D applications are you tracking usage levels of any
kind? I suppose it would be useful to know what features are heavily used and
which are almost never used. What metrics does your system colle
There are other issues with this loop. You must for example make sure
record is loaded and table is set to read/write. before doing something. I
have seen code where programnmer didn’t load record and it was locked
somewhere else. Thios causes all types of problems. I always for my for
loops like
as noted elsewhere:
for Send Record to do anything (and not give the error your have
mentioned) you have to have opened/created a file on disk with Set
Channel.
However, it is possible that there was a typo somewhere, and what you
are trying to do is to manipulate the record (do something with
did you use open channel before the send record
Regards
Chuck
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Dennis, Neil via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Not sure what your question is... this loops through all [Approvals]
> records that have [Approvals]Approved = false
>
> QUERY([Approvals];[App
Hi Noah,
I'm not clear if your question regards SEND RECORD or, "Am I missing
something in my understanding of looping over records?"
Regarding SEND RECORD, the example in the documentation isn't complete,
you first have to set up a destination for the record using SET CHANNEL.
An error -28 me
I just noticed you use send record instead of save record, that should work too
as long as you have an open channel using Set Channel.
-Original Message-
From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Dennis, Neil
via 4D_Tech
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 10:55 AM
To: su
Not sure what your question is... this loops through all [Approvals] records
that have [Approvals]Approved = false
QUERY([Approvals];[Approvals]approved=False)
For ($vlRecord;1;Records in selection([Approvals])) // loop through the
selection of Approvals
// Do something with the record
Good morning!
I work with a large codebase that has had many developers over the years.
Consequently, when building something new, I will sometimes look to see how
something was done previously. More often it has been the case that I will
go straight to the documentation to see the currently recomm
Hi Dan,
I'm not sure if this may help you
I'm working on a D365 integration right now. But we decided to use a Biztalk
server in between. Our D365 consultants created the OpenData interface while
I created the Restful interface to BizTalk. We transfer PO and SO.
Best
Adrian
--
Sent from:
33 matches
Mail list logo
