Hi there!
I guess, as a musician and sound engineer it is really important to have
a beatcounter (or bpm-counter). None that is part of another heavy
weight application. None that tries to calculate the beats per minute of
a song using strange algorythms, because: I never saw a piece of
softwa
Hi Michael,
Have you tried 'gtick'?
Well, it's not a JACK app, and it does not seem to do averaging of the
taps; but it's available from debian ;)
http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/categories/metronomes
gtklick, and klick support JACK; so it may be worth looking at those first.
Cheers,
robin
Mi
Hi Mitsch,
i also searched for a lightweight BPM counter some weeks ago.
Unfortunately I didn't really find a good one. At the moment i take a
freeware with WINE to do that ...
When I find some time, I'll re-search through the net and check if
there's one. Otherwise i think, that we can create
Mathias Krause schrieb:
> i also searched for a lightweight BPM counter some weeks ago.
> Unfortunately I didn't really find a good one. At the moment i take a
> freeware with WINE to do that ...
I did also, but I guess, for me it's time to get rid of those
windows-based stuff... :)
This one look
Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
> Thanks for reporting. OOPS; it's my bad again. I forgot to remove the
> "-rt11" on the AMD64 build-host..
>
> linux-image-2.6.31-2-multimedia-amd64 is up. please try again. I'll keep
> my fingers crossed.
I don't know, if it has
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
>
>
>> Thanks for reporting. OOPS; it's my bad again. I forgot to remove the
>> "-rt11" on the AMD64 build-host..
>>
>> linux-image-2.6.31-2-multimedia-amd64 is up. please try again. I'll keep
>> my fingers
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Mathias Krause schrieb:
>> i also searched for a lightweight BPM counter some weeks ago.
>> Unfortunately I didn't really find a good one. At the moment i take a
>> freeware with WINE to do that ...
> I did also, but I guess, for me it's tim
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I guess, as a musician and sound engineer it is really important to have
> a beatcounter (or bpm-counter). None that is part of another heavy
> weight application. None that tries to calculate the beats per minute of
> a song using strange algorythms, becau
David Adler wrote:
> It would be nice to have a bpm-counter sending tempo information that
> other apps (e.g. Phasex) can listen to.
> Does anything like that exist?
>
Until now Windows VST(i)s and Linux VST(i)s aren't fine for my 64
Studio, but VST(i)s are able to use the tempo information o
Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 20:46 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> IMO a beat counter is useless, as a musician I need some
> seconds to find the correct tempo without a beat counter and I'm really
> out of practise.
Without any external technical help?
Let me guess: Look at the watch, count an
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:26:14 +0200
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 20:46 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>
> > IMO a beat counter is useless, as a musician I need some
> > seconds to find the correct tempo without a beat counter and I'm really
> > out of practise.
>
> With
Michael Jarosch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 20:46 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>
>
>> IMO a beat counter is useless, as a musician I need some
>> seconds to find the correct tempo without a beat counter and I'm really
>> out of practise.
>>
>
> Without any external technical he
Folderol wrote:
> I'm a little confused here as to exactly why anyone needs a beat
> counter.
>
> If I'm playing live, I simply slot in with what everyone else is doing.
> I don't have a clue what BMP it is, and don't care.
>
> If I'm doing studio work a few seconds with any timing device at all is
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Okay, if you don't use a sequencer it might be useful for some usage and
> some people. Using a sequencer setting up the tempo easily can be done
> without a beat counter.
If you use a sequencer you _create_ the tempo.
Live music does not use clicktracks. I hate hunting f
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Folderol wrote:
>> I'm a little confused here as to exactly why anyone needs a beat
>> counter.
>>
>> If I'm playing live, I simply slot in with what everyone else is doing.
>> I don't have a clue what BMP it is, and don't care.
>>
>> If I'm do
Quentin Harley wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Okay, if you don't use a sequencer it might be useful for some usage
>> and some people. Using a sequencer setting up the tempo easily can be
>> done without a beat counter.
>
> If you use a sequencer you _create_ the tempo.
No, if you sync to a sho
David Adler wrote:
>> I can imagine that e.g. DJs need
>> to have a beat counter to pitch mixings, I didn't thought about this.
>>
>
> I really hope most of them still use their ears and hands for tempo matching.
>
If they only mix music of the same stile and from the same season, they
do
Hi List, Rui, Chris and William :)
@ *Rui and especially the 64 Studio coders*, the QjackCtl package for
Hardy fails, because of missing dependencies that are not served by
"standard" repositories for Hardy. I had to remove this broken version
and run into trouble, now every time I install a pa
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Michael Jarosch wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
>>
>>
>>> Thanks for reporting. OOPS; it's my bad again. I forgot to remove the
>>> "-rt11" on the AMD64 build-host..
>>>
>>> linux-image-2.6.31-2-multimedia-amd64 is up. please try a
> For now I'll restore /etc/modprobe.d/hda-intel and
> /etc/gdm/gdm.conf-custom a second time from the backup. This might or
> might not be the only files that were changed by the 64studio package.
At least the lists including the repositories also need to be restored :(.
QjackCtl was removed
Robin Gareus wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> OT to your thread, but not OT for the 2.6.31-2 kernel in general:
>> Kernels ex 2.6.31 need a new rtirq script. Rui made one on his holidays,
>> but the link isn't valid any more, maybe there's a fixed official
>> version available.
>>
>
> T
Hi :)
because of a problem with QjackCtl the package "64studio" was removed. I
need to keep it removed, because there is an error and each time I'll
install anything the package "64studio" would change
/etc/modeprobe.d/hda-intel, /etc/gdm/gdm.conf-custom,
/etc/apt/sources.list and maybe other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> because of a problem with QjackCtl the package "64studio" was removed. I
> need to keep it removed, because there is an error and each time I'll
> install anything the package "64studio" would change
> /etc/modeprobe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Somewhere in the users mailing list archive there must be some
> information about this. IIRC there is a beat counter, I guess Gustin did
> recommend one for 2.1. I was searching for a sequencer that is able to
I don't think
24 matches
Mail list logo
