-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>> Btw. I'm invented by Mathias and Rui to join the Qtractor dev list. Why
>>> does he speak for Rui?
>>>
>>>
>> Again, I am not on that list, I have no idea what is going on over there.
>>
>
> *lol
Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> Btw. I'm invented by Mathias and Rui to join the Qtractor dev list. Why
>> does he speak for Rui?
>>
>>
> Again, I am not on that list, I have no idea what is going on over there.
>
*lol* I was invited :D (not invented) by Rui to subscribe there, instead
of leavin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> and was writing about another list were a woman was banned. He wrote
>>> about making research, he knows that I e.g. use Qtractor and he
>>>
>>
>> I am not on that list so I have no idea what the context is. I am
> the BASH FAQ.
Important POSIX e.g. for "" for e.g. //hostname/path could be an
disadvantage.
I didn't read all FAQs, but they seem to be very important, resp.
"Bourne-Again Shell" might be the right choice.
POSIX standard seems to be less important for users,
http://www.unix.org/ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
http://www.google.ca/search?q=posix%20arrays
>>> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.shell/2007
Has anybody noticed an unwanted spell auto-correction function for
Thunderbird?
> I'll unsubsribe too.
Hm ... sometimes I guess Thunderbird has some hidden auto-spellchecking.
I "think I'm sure" ;) I wrote "I'll unsubscribe soon", perhaps with a
typo, maybe "I'll unsibscribe sonm" or what ever
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Seriously? I have no idea what you use or don't use. He made a
>>> suggestion and you chastised him. I guess we should all keep our mouths
>>> shut. We do not
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>>> http://www.google.ca/search?q=posix%20arrays
>>>
>>>
>> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.shell/2007-09/msg00320.html
>>
>> :)
>>
> Did you read the reply?
> http://u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> Seriously? I have no idea what you use or don't use. He made a
>> suggestion and you chastised him. I guess we should all keep our mouths
>> shut. We do not work for you, take some responsibility for yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> http://www.google.ca/search?q=posix%20arrays
>>
>
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.shell/2007-09/msg00320.html
>
> :)
Did you read the reply?
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.shell/2007-09/ms
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Seriously? I have no idea what you use or don't use. He made a
> suggestion and you chastised him. I guess we should all keep our mouths
> shut. We do not work for you, take some responsibility for your own
> experience. This is what I dislike most about FLOSS, all of th
> http://www.google.ca/search?q=posix%20arrays
>
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.shell/2007-09/msg00320.html
:)
___
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Kevin Donnelly wrote:
>> On Monday 12 October 2009 19:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> Today "Obsession - Open Busy Session Handler version 0.5" come into
>>> being, it's my second shell script :).
>>>
>> If you main aim is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Gustin :)
>
>>> test.bin\bash: 2: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
>>
>> That is the error you get when using /bin/sh (aka /bin/dash due to the
>> symlink).
>>
>
> /bin/sh is linked with dash and /bin/bash isn't a link, i
Hi Gustin :)
>> test.bin\bash: 2: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
>>
>
> That is the error you get when using /bin/sh (aka /bin/dash due to the
> symlink).
>
/bin/sh is linked with dash and /bin/bash isn't a link, it's bash, both
by default for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 amd64, I didn't changed t
Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 19:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Today "Obsession - Open Busy Session Handler version 0.5" come into
>> being, it's my second shell script :).
>>
>
> If you main aim is restoring sessions, I came across this last week:
> http://ladish.org/
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> Try the following one line at a time from a shell, it should not
>> matter if you are root:
>>
>> declare -a sourcedir=( "/etc" "/usr/local" "/var/log" )
>>
>> elements="${#sourcedir[*]}"
>>
>> for ((
Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> I tried #!/bin/sh and #!/bin/bash with 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 and both were
>> not fine with arrays. [snip]
>>
>
> /bin/sh is a sym link to dash, which is not as feature rich as Bash.
> Until your question I had forgotten that Ubuntu had made it the /bin/sh
> replacement
On Monday 12 October 2009 19:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Today "Obsession - Open Busy Session Handler version 0.5" come into
> being, it's my second shell script :).
If you main aim is restoring sessions, I came across this last week:
http://ladish.org/
"LADI Session Handler or simply ladish is a se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>
>>> Array variables are fine for e.g. c like shells and even for pseudo
>>> Bourne shells, e.g. on Suse or Debian, but not for real POSIX, e.g.
>>> /bin/sh on Ubuntu, anyway I'll take a look at those guides too.
>>>
>>
>>
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Hi Gustin :)
>>
>> thank you too.
>>
>> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi :)
some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Gustin :)
>
> thank you too.
>
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> Hi :)
>>>
>>> some users on that list seems to be fine with writing shell scripts.
Hi Gustin :)
thank you too.
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> Hi :)
>>
>> some users on that list seems to be fine with writing shell scripts. I'm
>> still not fine with it and endeavour to avoid non-POSIX style while
>> learni
David Adler wrote:
> [snip]
> It would be better to just list jack_snapshot
> as a dependency, requiring users to install it
> separately before using the script.
>
> Reasons:
>
> Most users won't want - or do not have the
> permissions - to run a script as a root.
>
> Since Installation of depende
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> some users on that list seems to be fine with writing shell scripts. I'm
> still not fine with it and endeavour to avoid non-POSIX style while
> learning how to write those scripts.
>
You may wish to have a look at the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I'm a little bit confused about the separation between user and root on the
> Ubuntu based 64 Studio. Does anybody know how I can launch an application as
> user by my shell script, even if the script was started as root?
> This is
Hi :)
some users on that list seems to be fine with writing shell scripts. I'm
still not fine with it and endeavour to avoid non-POSIX style while
learning how to write those scripts.
Today "Obsession - Open Busy Session Handler version 0.5" come into
being, it's my second shell script :).
27 matches
Mail list logo
