Re: [6lo] Understanding RFC8025 implementation and page switching

Thanks Robert, Pascal and Carsten for clarification and order of pages and mesh/frag headers in the context of paging dispatch. Is there a way to capture these information and tag that with RFC page? This is not an Errata but the order and explanation would be quite useful for the implementers for

Re: [6lo] [PATCH v5 6/6] 6lowpan: Fix IID format for Bluetooth

Hello Alexander, Glad to hear that folks are trying to implement RFC 7668. You are right in conclusion that no u or g bit handling is required. >From RFC 7668, section 3.2.2 -- it says that one should use 48-bit BT device identification and form the 64-bit IID separated by oxFFFE. The BT ident

Re: [6lo] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Thanks, sounds like you have it under control. On 2/28/17 2:55 PM, Kerry Lynn wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Thanks for your review. Comments inline... > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli > wrote: > > Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for >

Re: [6lo] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Stephen, Thanks for your review. Comments inline... On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > em

Re: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Thanks for your review. Comments inline... On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > em

Re: [6lo] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Joel, Thanks for your review. Comments inline... On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addres

Re: [6lo] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks for your review. Comments inline... On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addres

Re: [6lo] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alia, Thanks for your review. Comments inline... On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses

Re: [6lo] Last Call: (Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks) to Proposed Standard

Kerry Lynn writes: > Thanks for your thorough review of draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac. Sorry that > it has taken so long to get back to you. Can you take a look at the > new version and see if it addresses your concerns? Comments inline... Yes, the -07 cleans up all my concerns. > Section 6 has been