Thomas,
I agree, that could be another document or it can become
a common section used by all the SFs as a bootstrap process.
Regards,
Diego Dujovne
2017-10-31 14:40 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne :
> Diego,
> I don't think that's a good idea. The SF shuld
Diego,
I don't think that's a good idea. The SF shuld be a standalone document.
Cutting it into piece will IMO add delays. Plus, I want the SF(s) to really
be the end of the story, i.e. not leave other things open that are
undefined in the SF.
Thomas
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Prof. Diego Du
I would also separate the first part as a BCP as it happened
in RFC8180, to concentrate on the 6P requirements, in order
to provide a common structure to the SFs.
Regards,
Diego Dujovne
2017-10-31 13:55 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne :
> That's exactly what we need
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/agenda-100-6tisch/
We will discuss the agenda on the interim on Friday. Please contact Pascal
and myself if we missed something.
Thomas
--
___
Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Ne
That's exactly what we need to discuss in Singapore.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne <
diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl> wrote:
> My proposal would be to merge both SFX and MSF since
> they look complementary - from my point of view -.
> Any comments?
> Regards,
>
>
Dear all
If you plan to present at the 6TiSCH meeting at IETF 100, you need to be
registered to meetecho.
We proactively added the names listed here:
https://ietf100.conf.meetecho.com/list.php
If you find your name missing, (sorry and) please let us know asap.
Pascal
_
My proposal would be to merge both SFX and MSF since
they look complementary - from my point of view -.
Any comments?
Regards,
Diego
2017-10-31 10:43 GMT-03:00 Prof. Diego Dujovne :
> Dear all,
> From a fast overview of the draft:
>
> 1- The sched
Dear all,
From a fast overview of the draft:
1- The scheduling algorithm looks like a particular case of th SF0 (now SFX)
2- The collision detection algorithm is similar to what is already stated
on SF0 (now SFX) - in SF0 threshold (and before, a percentage) above
the average value i
Hi,
The attached is the txt format for the draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-msf-00. You
can refer to this attachment for now.
Tengfei
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hello Tengfei :
>
>
>
> For those interested, would you have another link in the
Hello Tengfei :
For those interested, would you have another link in the meantime (e.g. a WIP
in bitbucket) ?
Thanks in advance
Pascal
From: Tengfei Chang [mailto:tengfei.ch...@inria.fr]
Sent: mardi 31 octobre 2017 13:17
To: Prof. Diego Dujovne
Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) ; 6tisch@ietf.org
Diego, All,
Because of my mistake, I failed to submit this draft before the deadline.
We are waiting for the message from the administration to see if it's
possible to submit it.
I will keep you all update.
My apologies for the mistake!
Tengfei
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Prof. Diego Dujo
Dear all,
I cannot find the text for:
draft-chang-6tisch-6top-msf
Can you provide a link?
Thank you.
Regards,
Diego
2017-10-31 6:35 GMT-03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) :
> Dear all :
>
>
>
> *Note: Due to EU going CET this WE, this meeting is at 3PM CET!*
Dear all :
Note: Due to EU going CET this WE, this meeting is at 3PM CET!
We placed a draft agenda on the IETF tools site
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-interim-2017-6tisch-17-6tisch-01/
At the time of the posting it reads as follows; please let us know if we need
to consider changi
I also intended to link more strongly to I-D.vanderstok-ace-coap-est,
to map
out the appropriate verbs correctly and reference parts of that
document
better.
sounds good. thanks for the efforts
what about minimal-rekey?
Peter
___
6tisch mailin
14 matches
Mail list logo
