6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] Questions on RPL Settings in RFC 8180
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> pascal> Maybe we could amend/ERRATA the RFC to recommend different
> settings.
>
> It'd be nice to have some amendment or an errata entry for the following
> sentence.
think?
>
> Pascal
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
>> Sent: lundi 27 août 2018 17:29
>> To: 'Yasuyuki Tanaka' ; 6tisch@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [6tisch] Questions on RPL Settings in RFC 8180
>>
>> Hello Yatch
>&g
Hello Yatch:
I agree; thus my quote of RFC 6206 in the other mail.
Now even if we do not do an erratum, an implementation should not schedule a
transmission faster than it can send; iow I should be reset to Imin but rounded
to the next minimal slot or the next mcast slot available.
A node
Thank you, Pascal!
> [PT>] True, so we never reach 9 and stay compatible with OF0. I guess the max
> ETX of 3 is arbitrary, we could have gone up to 11/3...
OK! That is what I understood. It's very clear now.
> The initial value of I (see RFC 6206) is between Imin and Imax. With the
>
gt; From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> Sent: lundi 27 août 2018 17:29
> To: 'Yasuyuki Tanaka' ; 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [6tisch] Questions on RPL Settings in RFC 8180
>
> Hello Yatch
> >
> > (1) Rank Computation
> >
> > RFC 8180 says:
> >
> > r
Hello Yatch
>
> (1) Rank Computation
>
> RFC 8180 says:
>
> rfc8180> 5.1.1. Rank Computation
> rfc8180> (...)
> rfc8180> Sp SHOULD be calculated as (3*ETX)-2. The minimum value of Sp
> rfc8180> (MINIMUM_STEP_OF_RANK) indicates a good quality link. The
> rfc8180> maximum value of Sp
Hi all,
I have a few questions on the RPL settings described in RFC
8180. Could anyone help me find answers...?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8180#section-5
---
(1) Rank Computation
RFC 8180 says:
rfc8180> 5.1.1. Rank Computation
rfc8180> (...)
rfc8180> Sp SHOULD be calculated as
