Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-20 Thread Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
Hi Michael, the SFID is part of the 6P IE header so it is checked at both sides during a transaction. There can be multiple SFs running on a node (at the same time). (e.g one per slotframe with a different objective), hence the SFID is used to identify what SF originated the command. regards, X

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-20 Thread Michael Richardson
Xavi> information between the SF of the communicating nodes. The command Xavi> can be named SIGNAL and 6P will not define the content but only the Xavi> operation and encapsulation. The content will be defined by the Xavi> different SFs as an IE. Xavi> I think that a message l

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-20 Thread Yasuyuki Tanaka
Xavi, Thank you for the example! xavi> do you think makes sense? Yes, I do :-) Best, Yatch On 2017/07/20 5:19, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote: Hi Yatch, here an example, assume we have a fancy SF (named SFz) that requires to configure certain timeouts in a certain manner. Consider that thi

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Fabrice Théoleyre
That sounds great to me, and it is sufficiently flexible to be useful in many situations. Best regards, Fabrice > Le 20 juil. 2017 à 05:19, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen a > écrit : > > Hi Yatch, > > here an example, > > assume we have a fancy SF (named SFz) that requires to configure certain >

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Lijo Thomas
Seems to be useful one , Xavi.. Thanks & Regards, Lijo Thomas From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xavi Vilajosana Guillen Sent: 19 July 2017 22:53 To: tisch Subject: [6tisch] new command for 6P Dear all, I would like to propose a new command to be use

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
Hi Yatch, here an example, assume we have a fancy SF (named SFz) that requires to configure certain timeouts in a certain manner. Consider that this configuration cannot be deployed statically or pre-shared as it may depend on the app requirements, node rank or can be varying in time. When a nod

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Yasuyuki Tanaka
Xavi, That sounds interesting. Could you share any example what kind of configuration will be conveyed in a Signal Request and/or Response? Best, Yatch On 2017/07/19 19:22, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote: Dear all, I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protocol. The co

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Tengfei Chang
; *To:* tisch <6tisch@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [6tisch] new command for 6P > > > > Dear all, > > > > I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protocol. The > command may be used to configure SF or exchange information between the SF > of the

Re: [6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Makes sense to me ☺ From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xavi Vilajosana Guillen Sent: mercredi 19 juillet 2017 19:23 To: tisch <6tisch@ietf.org> Subject: [6tisch] new command for 6P Dear all, I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protoco

[6tisch] new command for 6P

2017-07-19 Thread Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
Dear all, I would like to propose a new command to be used to the 6P Protocol. The command may be used to configure SF or exchange information between the SF of the communicating nodes. The command can be named SIGNAL and 6P will not define the content but only the operation and encapsulation. The