and thank god for that.
you're taking all the fun out of complaining :(
We're suffering machine room renovation, major electrical
work and high winds. As a result of some combination of these,
we've had two major power outages and three minor ones today.
As a result of moving machines around recently, we hadn't had
all of our networking equipment and our computers on
> I'm still looking for undergrad/grad students who'd like to spend some
> time here in wine country.
>
> http://www.eagleridgeproperties.com/admin/housepictures/355707CA54.jpg
>
> I can pay you if you are a us citizen. If not, you can come here as a
> visitor (yeah, I know, no money sux but
> t
I'm still looking for undergrad/grad students who'd like to spend some
time here in wine country.
http://www.eagleridgeproperties.com/admin/housepictures/355707CA54.jpg
I can pay you if you are a us citizen. If not, you can come here as a
visitor (yeah, I know, no money sux but
there are some fu
SDnosense is used by devsd for access to the
raw device. it's used to keep a device from
returning sense data. for many drives this
means squirreling away the sense data because
it comes along with the status. is there any
particular reason why devsd can't do this?
maybe i'm missing something.
there's a little confusion with ata vs. ide. the short
2008 story is that ata is a command set, ide is a
programming interface. the history is much more
complicated and riddled with backronyms like
“pata.”
so i think it would be a good idea to at least
make this change in sd(3)
; diffy -c sd
/
bellisimo!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:50 AM, andrey mirtchovski
wrote:
>> On the first hand again, given the occasional reports of "replica hosed me"
>> I'm not terribly keen on trusting
>
> given the occasional reports of "software X hosed me" (for any and all
> X), i don't think we should be ter
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:49:58AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > exactly. the point i was trying to make, and evidently
> > was being too coy about, is that 330 odd gb wouldn't
> > be as useful a number as the sum of the sizes of all the
> > new/changed files from all the dump days. this wou
> > On the first hand again, given the occasional reports of "replica hosed me"
> > I'm not terribly keen on trusting
>
> given the occasional reports of "software X hosed me" (for any and all
> X), i don't think we should be terribly keen on using computers at
> all.
or, being a programmer, one
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:50:50AM -0700, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> > On the first hand again, given the occasional reports of "replica hosed me"
> > I'm not terribly keen on trusting
>
> given the occasional reports of "software X hosed me" (for any and all
> X), i don't think we should be terr
> On the first hand again, given the occasional reports of "replica hosed me"
> I'm not terribly keen on trusting
given the occasional reports of "software X hosed me" (for any and all
X), i don't think we should be terribly keen on using computers at
all.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:49:58AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> exactly. the point i was trying to make, and evidently
> was being too coy about, is that 330 odd gb wouldn't
> be as useful a number as the sum of the sizes of all the
> new/changed files from all the dump days. this would
> be a
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 07:49 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > exactly. the point i was trying to make, and evidently
> > was being too coy about, is that 330 odd gb wouldn't
> > be as useful a number as the sum of the sizes of all the
> > new/changed files from all the dump days. this would
> >
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 07:49 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> exactly. the point i was trying to make, and evidently
> was being too coy about, is that 330 odd gb wouldn't
> be as useful a number as the sum of the sizes of all the
> new/changed files from all the dump days. this would
> be a useful
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:07:48PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
Oh, glad that somebody found my partial git port useful, I might give
it another push some time.
Having a git/hg repo of the plan9 history is something I have been
thinking about for a while, really cool that you got something going
already.
Stop being sensible! There is no room on this list for such behaviour.
brucee
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:28 AM, erik quanstrom
>> wrote:
>> >> > what extra work would that be,
>> >>
>> >> that it pulls files in their entirety (IOW: cp /
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:28 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >> > what extra work would that be,
> >>
> >> that it pulls files in their entirety (IOW: cp /n/sources/... /)
> >
> > i would be very suprised if a single copy of sources had many shared
> > blocks.
>
> He doesn't want a single copy tho
patch(1) (diff. from the lunix patch...)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Andreas Zell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i fixed some bugs in aquarela.
> Is this the right place to post the patches ?
>
> AZ.
>
>
--
Federico G. Benavento
Hello,
i fixed some bugs in aquarela.
Is this the right place to post the patches ?
AZ.
20 matches
Mail list logo
