>I don't think the on-board network adapter is supported (Atheros
>AR81xx), I use a gigabit intel nic. I haven't really looked at the
>onboard audio, I use an usb sound card.
unfortunately, not (yet) supported.
>I have had some problems using the box as a cpu server, as it would
>freeze up from
> Sorry, this is all bunk. You shouldn't be worried about
> an accidental collision. You should be worried about
> an intentional collision. Especially if your filesystem
> stores data that is under the attackers control such as
> email messages, web page caches, etc. So what you need
> to anal
> I guess I wasn't clear; what I was asking was why it was safe to
> attempt to take a lock when splhi() at all.
because the rule is you can't sleep when holding a lock.
- erik
Hi,
I guess I wasn't clear; what I was asking was why it was safe to
attempt to take a lock when splhi() at all.
On a UP, if that lock is contended and interrupts are off, you'll
lockup, no? (The timer interrupt handler will never run, reschedule
will never happen, the lock holder will never run)
>
> ilock() (pc/lock.c) calls splhi() and then calls lock(). If that lock were
> contended, how would the system not stop? And on a UP system, if you're
> inside an splhi() block,
> why would you need to take an uncontended lock?
>
ilock is for locks that get used both in normal procs
and in inter
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Tristan Plumb <9p...@imu.li> wrote:
> enums can hold doubles (which is quite nice)
>
Umm, no they can't.
Russ
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6349-Perceived-Risk.html
Sorry, this is all bunk. You shouldn't be worried about
an accidental collision. You should be worried about
an intentional collision. Especially if your filesystem
stores data that is under the attackers control such as
email messages
Hi Steve,
I also have an Asus P5Q motherboard (not "SE2") and an Asus EN6200LE/TC video
card. I have been able to install from a sata dvd+rw drive in both IDE and AHCI
mode, using the sata ports connected to the ICH10R. IDE compatability mode
works with the official distribution, but without dm
> 1. The installation of Plan 9 is not possible. I found
> that the Marvell 88se61xx IDE controller is not working.
> The message:
> pcirouting: ignoring south bridge PCI.0.31.0 8086/3A18
the pcirouting message is likely unrelated.
this is probablly a bug in the ahci driver. the ahci driver sho
> How can I stop starting rc and go to the console? Booting from
> cdrom is not possible at the moment.
alternatively, if you have a network perhaps you could PXE boot the
machine from another host and then mount and edit plan9.ini
-Steve
Hi,
after reading a lot of chip sets I was thinking:
No risk, no fun
and bought a very new motherboard. The board is
an Asus P5Q SE2 with Intel P45 and ICH10.
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=T4T7B10FfR6zJ4Ns&templete=2
Here my results:
1. The installation of Plan 9 is not possible. I f
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6349-Perceived-Risk.html
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM, wrote:
> here are efforts to build a staticly linked linux distribution:
>
> http://stali.suckless.org/
>
> have not tried it on linuxemu yet, but from the discription they
> will use some alternative tiny libc.
>
> looks like the right direction...
>
> --
> cinap
here are efforts to build a staticly linked linux distribution:
http://stali.suckless.org/
have not tried it on linuxemu yet, but from the discription they
will use some alternative tiny libc.
looks like the right direction...
--
cinap
--- Begin Message ---
cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
> look at
> NaN(2) and Inf(2) are not constant functions. the result depends on
> the settings of the fcr (getfcr(2)).
Really? My reading of /sys/src/libc/port/nan.c makes me think NaN(2)
returns a uvlong value of 0x7ff1, miss I something?
On the other hand, the assignment of NaN to a double de
> ilock() (pc/lock.c) calls splhi() and then calls lock(). If that lock were
> contended,
> how would the system not stop? And on a UP system, if you're inside an
> splhi() block,
> why would you need to take an uncontended lock?
good question. on a up system, splhi() is sufficient. on a mp
s
Hi,
I was looking at the sources to kenfs and saw something that confused me -
ilock() (pc/lock.c) calls splhi() and then calls lock(). If that lock were contended,
how would the system not stop? And on a UP system, if you're inside an splhi() block,
why would you need to take an uncontended l
> One thing leading to another, I am currently centralizing constants, and
> found that enums can hold doubles (which is quite nice), but I have no
> way of defining NaN or Inf as a constant, is there such a way?
>
> Or is there a way to evaluate constant functions at compile time (eep)?
NaN(2) a
I'm porting PROJ4.3.3 (the cleanest version of proj I could find), and
it's a little ugly.
One thing leading to another, I am currently centralizing constants, and
found that enums can hold doubles (which is quite nice), but I have no
way of defining NaN or Inf as a constant, is there such a way?
19 matches
Mail list logo
