I had the thought why not write a C++ to C converter
CFront was the original front end and it has been enhanced somewhat
since its early days. But I believe it isn't likely to support all of
G++'s features. You'll find it on sources:
/n/sources/steve/cfront/
Of course, one could try
The master drive is Fujitsu MPE3054AT and
the slave is a CD-writer.
MPE3464AT, I stand corrected. The flchk operation had jammed solid
and I did have a jumper missing to indicate that there was a slave
drive attached.
I have added the jumper and replaced the cable with a high-density
variety
Hi
I'm aware of XeTeX (I had mentioned XeLaTeX in an earlier thread), and
yes, I understand one wouldn't be looking for identity with what other
platforms support. I agree that one shouldn't be looking to ape, but
rather to provide the same or more functionality in a better way.
Perhaps I'll be
On Sun Apr 18 01:19:01 EDT 2010, jjackson...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing a paper with troff -ms using the default Times font, and
the greater than or equal to symbol appears to have an extra
line...so it looks like '' above '=', instead of '' above '_' . It
looks like eqn is
So I have tested if the big version of tex provided by kerTeX can dump
the format for LaTeX.
The answer is yes. Nothing special here (at least for a 5 years old
version that was provided in the teTeX distributions I used before
kerTeX---I don't use LaTeX.)
I'm cleaning the things and writing the
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:52 AM, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
I had the thought why not write a C++ to C converter
CFront was the original front end and it has been enhanced somewhat
since its early days. But I believe it isn't likely to support all of
G++'s features. You'll find it on
On 04/17/2010 05:35 PM, C H Forsyth wrote:
perhaps Plan 9 is just the Black Books of software?
Just to clarify, you do mean the TV show?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Books
--
Scott Sullivan
scheme
ocaml
haskell
lua
limbo
linda
pforth
python
tcl
4th
bprolog
p2c (pascal 2 c)
f2c (fortran 2 c)
extra/perl which could be easily updated
--
Federico G. Benavento
Hyper-V is negative for 2008r2.
try using ≥. (u+0x2265)
- erik
Yup...that works and it looks great! Thanks!
-Justin
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:35:53 BST C H Forsyth fors...@vitanuova.com wrote:
perhaps Plan 9 is just the Black Books of software?
You mean with 9fans playing the role of Bernard Black? Could
be -- if you squint a bit Black Books is an anarchic place,
with piles of books, cartons of old
There have been many direct responses to my posts, every
one of them has a number of good points - even when I
disagree with some of them; and (as is natural and expected)
a number of misunderstandings as well.
I can't respond to them all without spamming the list, so I'll
refrain (wouldn't
On my new plan 9 terminal running under vmware fusion on my leopard
macbook this happens:
Executing the command
term% for (i in `{seq 1 254}) {ip/ping -n 1 192.168.1.1}
causes
panic: Fsprotoclone: all conversations in use
panic :Fsprotoclone: all conversations in use
dumpstack disabled
cpu0:
On Friday 16 April 2010 16:58:38 andrey mirtchovski wrote:
TL;DR
On Friday 16 April 2010 21:20:15 Federico G. Benavento wrote:
too long for me to read, could you summarize in 3 lines?
On Saturday 17 April 2010 10:06:35 Iruata Souza wrote:
still too long.
I'm not avoiding these requests.
term% for (i in `{seq 1 254}) {ip/ping -n 1 192.168.1.1}
i think you mean
for(i in `{seq 1 254}){ip/ping -n1 192.168.1.$i}
panic: Fsprotoclone: all conversations in use
panic :Fsprotoclone: all conversations in use
dumpstack disabled
cpu0: exiting
Regardless of whether my
There are limits on the number of concurrent conversations per
protocol. For UDP, it's currently 1024, for TCP it's currently 1024
on terminals and 4096 on cpu servers. For ICMP, it's currently 128;
you may want to raise that. To find the current limits,
grep 'nc = ' /sys/src/9/ip/*.c
Just to clarify, you do mean the TV show?
yes, yes i do.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:32 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
term% for (i in `{seq 1 254}) {ip/ping -n 1 192.168.1.1}
i think you mean
for(i in `{seq 1 254}){ip/ping -n1 192.168.1.$i}
Sorry, I meant
for(i in `{seq 1 254}){ip/ping -n1 192.168.1.$i}
I added the as I
i don't think i understand your point at all any more. more
verbiage isn't going to solve it for me.
two small things, though:
Regardless, even if the sources _were_ stagnant... and even if
Plan 9 proper was used professionally by an even _smaller_
number of developers, it would still
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:32 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
term% for (i in `{seq 1 254}) {ip/ping -n 1 192.168.1.1}
i think you mean
for(i in `{seq 1 254}){ip/ping -n1 192.168.1.$i}
Sorry, I meant
for(i in `{seq 1 254}){ip/ping -n1 192.168.1.$i}
I
Hope I'm not being a bother, but I was just wondering how some of the
Plan9 troff users out there approach the problem of citations and
bibliographies, since refer(1) seems to have fallen out of favor. My
guess is that users are encouraged to write their own scripts to get
exactly what they want,
I use a package providing imprecise citations. You cite like in
[. networks plan 9.]
and it locates a ref containing those words. I don't remember the package name,
I now the program I run is bib and that files use .ref suffixes that
must be indexed
with a program called invert.
If that's not
...refer(1) seems to have fallen out of favor.
Not at all, I still use it.
contrib/install steve/refer
Thanks to Forsyth for the majority of the work, I just
added a few bits and packaged it.
-Steve
On Sun Apr 18 16:41:17 EDT 2010, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
There are limits on the number of concurrent conversations per
protocol. For UDP, it's currently 1024, for TCP it's currently 1024
on terminals and 4096 on cpu servers. For ICMP, it's currently 128;
you may want to raise that.
Could you (or someone) elaborate on the C99 battle? I'm wondering whether
this implies critique of the C99 standard or something else (and how this
relates to C under Plan9)
Thanks
K
Corey co...@bitworthy.net 18/04/2010 3:26 pm
Plan 9 chose not to fight any
network protocol standards (IL
i dont think you need that. devip calls a protocol specific
garbage collector procedure that will close these hanging
connections for you if it runs out of connections.
/sys/src/9/ip/tcp.c:/^tcpgc
well, the test is a little bit more complicated as it takes
a minimum inactivity time into account.
made a patch that changes the panic into a print:
/n/sources/patch/devip-allconvused-panic
i'm not sure that's what one wants, in general.
depending on the protocol and the use case, you may
want to
(a) panic
(b) print (carefully)
(c) wait for the resource to become available.
i'd be afraid
disclaimer: dns works great at 2 of the 3 plan 9 sites i maintain.
unfortunately, one squeeky mouse gets the exterminator fired.
dns under heavy use is continuing to be problematic. before
the recent locking changes, i was seeing several crashes a month.
after the locking changes, i am seeing
On Sunday 18 April 2010 13:58:19 erik quanstrom wrote:
[purposefully removed context surrounding the following statement:]
snip
seems awful limiting for a research os.
Exactly.
Plan X proposes an extension of 9 space for the experimental purpose
of promoting and supporting an additional
if one wants to retry connecting he can. not being able to make a
network connection is a very common case so i guess it would be ok to
simply let it fail on this point instead of hanging and waiting.
rebooting sounds like a little bit too drastic for me. expecially if it
is about icmp sockets.
Then let's see it happen; I'm not sure what you're waiting for.
-Original Message-
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Corey
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:51 PM
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mars Needs Women
On Sunday 18 April
panic(me is a boofhead);
no, that's presotto :p
On Apr 18, 2010, at 3:58 PM, C H Forsyth wrote:
Just to clarify, you do mean the TV show?
yes, yes i do.
Please end this thread. Soon you'll have someone re-implementing the 'google
write in C' lyrics and posting yet another video to you tube.
Or better yet, the reciting all of Ed Wood's
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Federico G. Benavento
benave...@gmail.com wrote:
p2c (pascal 2 c)
Anyone ever peek at one of the Oberon to C compliers? Or maybe the
Oxford stuff?
http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Oxford_Oberon-2_compiler
-Jack
On Sun Apr 18 21:21:10 EDT 2010, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
if one wants to retry connecting he can.
if you're primarly functioning as a server, that might be true,
but not helpful. you may just appear down. it's just no fun
to get the call i can't (read my mail|cpu in|...) at 2am. i'd
Anyone ever peek at one of the Oberon to C compliers? Or maybe the
Oxford stuff?
http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Oxford_Oberon-2_compiler
why not build a native compiler? translating to c seems such
a waste. oberon (especially wirth's current iteration) is tiny.
unfortunately, i
Could you (or someone) elaborate on the C99 battle? I'm wondering whether
this implies critique of the C99 standard or something else (and how this
relates to C under Plan9)
ken's c compiler has some extensions. like unnamed structures.
you don't have to use them. i don't think that's an
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Corey co...@bitworthy.net wrote:
On Sunday 18 April 2010 13:58:19 erik quanstrom wrote:
[purposefully removed context surrounding the following statement:]
snip
seems awful limiting for a research os.
Exactly.
Plan X proposes an extension of 9 space for
but if you're looking for somebody to say Sounds
great, where do you want me to start? you'll probably be waiting a
long time,
I think it's more what a great idea, I've thought about the same and
here is what I have done. Fact is, it's all largely there in
/n/sources/contrib(*), 9vx and p9p,
39 matches
Mail list logo
