Investigating the possibility of replacing the MS DNS on Plan9 DNS,not found
in the man ndb mention of records of type SRV.
It is necessary to support Microsoft Active Directory. Maybe I missed
something?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record
Hello !
As far as I know, ndb have support for SRV, PTR, TXT resords. There
is no sample, of cause :)
I think tha it may look like this:
ip=10.0.0.1 sys=_service
dom=_tcp.local
srv=
2011/4/28 Sergey Kornilovich roo...@gmail.com:
Investigating the possibility of replacing the MS DNS on
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Peter A. Cejchan wrote:
spaces in filenames.. does not it break the rules?? Who actually needs
them??
++pac
Mostly people who have grown up with graphical user interfaces and
have no appreciation of the command line parsing complexity it
adds I
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 14:11:27 Digby Tarvin wrote:
On a slightly related topics, one of my constant headaches lately
is the problem of deciding what filesystem to put on large capacity
removeable storage to give me maximum interoperability...
What I really want is somthing that I can
no idea about p9, sorry, but there used to be a r/o ext2 driver.
not just r/o - ext2srv(4)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:35:56PM +0200, dexen deVries wrote:
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 14:11:27 Digby Tarvin wrote:
On a slightly related topics, one of my constant headaches lately
is the problem of deciding what filesystem to put on large capacity
removeable storage to give me
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 16:00:53 Digby Tarvin wrote:
at some point i had that crazy idea to have a pendrive formatted in ext3
or nilfs2, with small auxiliary partition with a virtual machine -- and
use the virtual machine as a filesystem server when on hostile OS.
Not a bad idea, but
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 16:00:53 Digby Tarvin wrote:
But What I think is really needed for this sort of application is a
filesystem with:
Minimal restrictions of file size (64 bit addresses)
Maximum versatility in FS topology (hard link support etc)
Minimal restriction
OK,
So I'm trying to compile the pcf kernel from quanstro's 9atom.iso.bz2.
There seems to be an undocumented dependency on the quanstro/fis
contrib(1). (Without it, 8c complains that it can't find an include
file named fis.h or some such.) I now have that.
I've also added the two assembly
so i was looking at what's going on with gs. it appears to be having
ape issues. but along the way this cropped up:
; ps -a | grep gs
quanstro 795900:04 0:03 4292893752K Broken gs -dNOPAUSE
-dDELAYSAFER -sDEVICE=plan9 -sOutputFile=/fd/3 -dQUIET -r100 -dTextAlphaBits=4
So I'm trying to compile the pcf kernel from quanstro's 9atom.iso.bz2.
There seems to be an undocumented dependency on the quanstro/fis
contrib(1). (Without it, 8c complains that it can't find an include
file named fis.h or some such.) I now have that.
I've also added the two assembly
dexen deVries dexen.devr...@gmail.com writes:
tar? webdav?
in a way, a reverse of typical p9 fileserver -- read files, serve filesystem
image.
I was thinking of that. An embedded Linux or Plan 9 device as USB
client, presenting an MSD interface. It could present a number of
partitions,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:13:17PM +0200, dexen deVries wrote:
funny thing, my current pendrive (which really is nokia n900 phone) has
abundance of powerful hardware -- cpu, ram and 32GB + microSD block storage.
you got me fantasizing.
9p served over usb (either directly, as mentioned
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com writes:
size 9pcf
_strayintrx: _tracein/_traceout not defined 5 5
_strayintrx: _tracein: not defined
_strayintrx: _traceout: not defined
mk: 8c -FTVw '-DKERNDATE='`{date ... : exit status=rc 5800: 8l 5804:
error
_straintrx is
Yes, I'm sure. :) In typical paranoid newbie fashion, I made sure to do
an 'ls -l /386/lib' before trying to build the kernel... oh, wait. Let
me try a 'mk clean' first... nope. Same error.
how about
cd /sys/src/libc; mk mk clean
- erik
There is a package called zonefresh in my contrib, this doea and axfr transfer
from
the given host/domain and writes an ndb file with the results.
This understands srv records though I have never tried re-exporting the info
from ndb and checking the results agains msdns. you should be able to do
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com writes:
Wow, you know, as a Gentoo user, I'm amazed AMAZED amazed amazed AMAZED
amazed how fast Plan 9 can compile a kernel or libc. Compiling glibc
(on Linux) usually takes over half a day. Compiling a kernel generally
takes a couple of hours. This is
This is great!
it is, isn't it? 6 seconds kernel compile, 15 seconds turnaround time
when developing anything in the kernel (with PXE boot). beat that,
modern operating systems :)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:35 AM, andrey mirtchovski
mirtchov...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great!
it is, isn't it? 6 seconds kernel compile, 15 seconds turnaround time
when developing anything in the kernel (with PXE boot). beat that,
modern operating systems :)
yes, I had to help config and
On Thu Apr 28 13:25:13 EDT 2011, smi...@zenzebra.mv.com wrote:
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com writes:
Wow, you know, as a Gentoo user, I'm amazed AMAZED amazed amazed AMAZED
amazed how fast Plan 9 can compile a kernel or libc. Compiling glibc
(on Linux) usually takes over half a
See ndb(6).
Ron wrote:
andrey mirtchovski
mirtchov...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is great!
it is, isn't it? 6 seconds kernel compile, 15 seconds
turnaround time
when developing anything in the kernel (with PXE
boot). beat that,
modern operating systems :)
yes, I had to help config and build a
Compiling glibc (on Linux) usually takes over half a day.
you're not counting iterations where something goes wrong, as it always does
for me.
On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
Life is too short to configure and compile Linux and
GNU software.
BLS
another nomination for the fortunes file
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 20:50:14 Brian L. Stuart wrote:
Life is too short to configure and compile Linux and
GNU software.
or spending days on choosing a computer with all the hardware supported. oh
wait.
to the wit: the current hacker-unfriendlines of linux (a.k.a. `user
friendlines')
On Thu Apr 28 15:30:38 EDT 2011, dexen.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 20:50:14 Brian L. Stuart wrote: Life is
too short to configure and compile Linux and GNU software.
or spending days on choosing a computer with all the hardware
supported. oh wait.
that's not how
On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:29 PM, dexen deVries wrote:
the current hacker-unfriendlines of linux (a.k.a. `user
friendlines') is the price paid for vide driver support.
perhaps in some vague philosophical terms, but certainly
that isn't any sort of actual engineering trade-off. you also
seem to be
Investigating the possibility of replacing the MS DNS on Plan9 DNS,not found
in the man ndb mention of records of type SRV.
It is necessary to support Microsoft Active Directory. Maybe I missed
something?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record
I got AD to work with Plan 9 DNS just last year.
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:39:07 PM erik quanstrom wrote:
On Thu Apr 28 15:30:38 EDT 2011, dexen.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 of April 2011 20:50:14 Brian L. Stuart wrote: Life is
too short to configure and compile Linux and GNU software.
or spending days on choosing a
errno, you sound like you may be trespassing on our collective 9fans
lawn. i wave a cane in your general direction.
Though I don't understand why folks around here complain about
linux so often and so vehemently, when the only reason why you're
complaining is because you _need_ linux... to furnish all the things
you can't do with plan 9 - either personally, or within your organization.
people who care
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com writes:
; 9diff mkfile
/n/sources/plan9//sys/src/libc/386/mkfile:23,28 - mkfile:23,29
strcpy.s\
strlen.s\
tas.s\
+ trace.s\
vlop.s\
Oh, of course! If it isn't assembled, the loader will never find the
symbols. :) That
(Interestingly, the 9pcf.gz produced was about 7KB smaller than the one
you gave me. I'm guessing that there's some additional stuff in your
9pcf that's not in mine, but it seems to be working fine.)
you're using 16-bit runes, and the standard pre-unicode 3.0 tables,
which are smaller.
-
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:00 PM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
[1] For those gnashing teeth over glibc - might want to check out
musl libc. It's no plan 9 libc, but it's definitely less worse than glibc.
Once I get my teeth back in I will gnash them even more.
ron
34 matches
Mail list logo
