Re: [9fans] How do I get a CSR CA's like?

2015-05-24 Thread Brantley Coile
Thanks all. It goes through sslshopper fine, but the CA still doesn’t like it. I’ll call them tomorrow. Thanks for all the help. bwc > On May 23, 2015, at 1:08 PM, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote: > >> I then pasted the contents of ‘csr’ into the page and get “This CSR >> has an invalid signature!

Re: [9fans] How do I get a CSR CA's like?

2015-05-24 Thread lucio
> Thanks all. It goes through sslshopper fine, but the CA still doesn’t > like it. I’ll call them tomorrow. Thanks for all the help. You may have neglected some of the options, for example, you may be required to specify what the certificate is good for: web server, mail server, etc. I know ho

Re: [9fans] How do I get a CSR CA's like?

2015-05-24 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
going by my notes from the last time i used plan9 tools to generate a CSR, the only differences i see are quoting the O attribute to handle spaces in organization name and dropping the word "SIGNING" from PEM header/footer. > Thanks all. It goes through sslshopper fine, but the CA still doesn’t l

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread erik quanstrom
> Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are > slices - therefore they are different types. > yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different size arrays are not type compatable (yea pascal). also the fu := bar[:] looks a lot like the tedious casting from

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
http://blog.golang.org/go-slices-usage-and-internals 2015-05-24 8:55 GMT-07:00 erik quanstrom : >> Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are >> slices - therefore they are different types. >> > > yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different size arrays are

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:55 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > and implies dynamic allocation of the slice, i'm guessing. Don't guess. Please read the links I provided, they explain all this. Arrays in Go are not like arrays in C and Pascal, slices are more close. Go arrays are values, so copying one i

Re: [9fans] multicast

2015-05-24 Thread Jeff Sickel
Steve, Did you ever figure out how to setup addmulti? -jas > On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Steve Simon wrote: > > I am trying to listen to multicast DNS packets > but when I try to configure the IP interface it fails, > what am I missing? > > I do this (multicast with promiscuous) > > s

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
It's actually a reference to the original array, I believe. On May 24, 2015 10:55:31 AM CDT, erik quanstrom wrote: >> Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and >[]byte are >> slices - therefore they are different types. >> > >yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that diff

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
Go array =~ C++ std::array Go slice =~ C++ std::vector& On May 24, 2015 12:02:54 PM CDT, "Aram Hăvărneanu" wrote: >On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:55 PM, erik quanstrom >wrote: >> and implies dynamic allocation of the slice, i'm guessing. > >Don't guess. Please read the links I provided, they explain

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Bakul Shah
On May 24, 2015, at 8:55 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte are >> slices - therefore they are different types. > > yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different size arrays are not type > compatable > (yea pascal). als

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
On May 24, 2015 2:00:05 PM CDT, Bakul Shah wrote: > > >On May 24, 2015, at 8:55 AM, erik quanstrom >wrote: > >>> Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and >[]byte are >>> slices - therefore they are different types. >> >> yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that differ

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread minux
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:55 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > > Uhm I might be mistaken, but I guess [8192]byte is an array, and []byte > are > > slices - therefore they are different types. > > > > yes, exactly. i suppose this implies that different size arrays are not > type compatable > (yea pasc

Re: [9fans] I killed plan9.ini; what to do?

2015-05-24 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
THANK YOU SO MUCH My Plan 9 installation is saved! I had accidentally wiped my HDD with Plan 9 via an erroneous dd command and just installed it back only to screw up plan9.ini. Hence my frustration. :) On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 4:49 PM, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread C Cirello
2015-05-24 23:25 GMT+02:00 minux : > > Regarding the boring comment, I agree to some extent. There isn't > many fancy features that other languages have, but that's exactly the > advantage of Go, and it's the price to pay when you want readability. > (i.e. you don't need ~65 pages of style guide ju

Re: [9fans] ot: pascal rides again?

2015-05-24 Thread lucio
> (i.e. you don't need ~65 pages of style guide just to tell you how to > write acceptable code.) I think it's wasteful to defend Go. Let history do that... Lucio.