> this board has quite a number of features, and might be useful for
> education if the cost isn't prohibitive.
The list is impressive and the schematics ought to make things
simpler, but will support for Plan 9 be a real possibility?
Persoanlly, I think Gbit ether is essential and a second ether
Hi Brian,
Plan 9 works really well on a Raspberry Pi B for me. Haven't tried it on a
RasPi 2 yet though.
I would be rather cautious about so called compatible products. I have yet
to meet a product that is truly compatible and the quirks tend to take up a
disproportionate amount of time to reso
brian,
i have started work on porting 9front to
http://www.elinux.org/MIPS_Creator_CI20.
this board has quite a number of features, and might be useful for
education if the cost isn't prohibitive.
nick
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> I'm teaching a special topics cours
Brian, does your uni let you publish your curriculum or course notes? Is
this something you've ever considered?
-joe
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Brian L. Stuart
wrote:
> I'm teaching a special topics course this fall I'm
> calling Computing in the Small. Right now, I'm
> leaning toward cond
On 7 August 2015 at 18:13, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> So depending
> on where plan9-bcm stands, it might be just right.
>
That seems to be an old version of /sys/src/9/bcm (perhaps with
modifications)
so Richard Miller's version in contrib will be more up-to-date, I think.
On Thu, 8/6/15, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> Olimex in Bulgaria manufacture and market worldwide a very wide
> range of AVR and ARM based boards and peripherals. They target
> the DIY market. Pay their site (olimex.com works for me) a visit.
They do look interesting, and I like their intention
On Wed, 8/5/15, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
> RPI's running something like plan9-bcm (check github) where gpio
> is exposed should work. I'm going to try plan9-bcm this weekend;
> i'll keep you posted.
Thanks for the pointer. I'll definitely check that out. I'm hoping to
expose them to a little bit
On Wed, 8/5/15, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> I think the big advantage of the Rpi or Rpi2 (for speed,
> memory and cores)is that there's a wealth of published
> projects for them, including hardware ones, and other stuff,
> and they aren't likely to go away. It's true that lacking SATA
> and Gb Ether
