sweet! thanks
On 1/25/19 8:03 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
> recursion works fine. here's an example:
>
> https://gist.github.com/9nut/476be37e25e9561f525036bcf60a2014
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:37 PM Parker Ellertson
> wrote:
>
> This might be a stupid question to ask, but how well
recursion works fine. here's an example:
https://gist.github.com/9nut/476be37e25e9561f525036bcf60a2014
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:37 PM Parker Ellertson
wrote:
> This might be a stupid question to ask, but how well does the rc shell
> support recursion in its scripts? I ask because I'm
This might be a stupid question to ask, but how well does the rc shell
support recursion in its scripts? I ask because I'm writing a script
which will rely on calling itself a whole bunch. I could write it in
python or go or some other language, but I've been wanting to give rc a
try for a
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, at 9:59 PM, Federico Benavento wrote:
> I’ve been able to survive quite well on a regular Mac terminal with it.
I remember thinking regular rc was tolerable on a Mac terminal thanks to the
terminal copy/pasting with normal keybindings, but this would be better.
I've been
correct. Doug's original proposal was very nonlinear. Ken's genius was finding an implementable and useful subset.- erikOn Jan 25, 2019 07:13, Stuart Morrow wrote:I take back the stuff where a directory can be a command - it interacts weird with $path:you’d do `..’ thinking it’s the same as
I take back the stuff where a directory can be a command - it interacts weird
with $path:
you’d do `..’ thinking it’s the same as `cd ..’, except it’s actually `cd
/bin/..’.
> is there a buildable version of es any longer?
I just found
http://wryun.github.io/es-shell/
I’ve never
> I just wanted the shell, not the whole thing
You should post it to suckless. I recall a thread years ago discussing what
the ‘official’ shell of the suckless project ought to be. Rc went completely
unmentioned for at least about half of the thread, although they can’t
possibly have been
