On 17/01/2022 23:36, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:31 AM Matt wrote:
But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even though
Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry that one day
they become too different,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:36:19AM +0100, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
>
> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
> 9front. One of the reasons is that it actually works and is still
> being developed and used by many. Plan 9 is dead, 9front lives on.
> There is
if there's any branch of plan9 missing in 9front please just send the
patch or a reminder.
On 1/18/22, Matt wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 17, 2022, at 8:36 PM, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
> wrote:
>> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
> 9front. One of the reasons
On Monday, January 17, 2022, at 8:36 PM, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
9front. One of the reasons is that it actually works and is still
being developed and used by many. Plan 9 is dead, 9front lives on.
There is also
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:32 PM Matt wrote:
>
> But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even
> though Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry
> that one day they become too different, especially since the community is
> rather centered
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:31 AM Matt wrote:
>
> But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even
> though Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry
> that one day they become too different, especially since the community is
> rather centered
But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even though
Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry that one day
they become too different, especially since the community is rather centered
around Plan 9 rather than 9front? Or is the community
Quoth Matt :
> @ori: Those are examples of forked software that happened because of the
> discontinuation of the original software, right?
No.
Most of the originals were around
after the fork, at least for a while.
Many of them are still around. In
some cases, it's the fork that didn't
make it.
@Humm: I understand that Android isn't a fork of Linux, I meant to imply that
although Android is argued to be a Linux distro, they have very different
environments that can't easily interact with each other. I also know that the
meaning of forking is objective, I meant that forking invokes the
Quoth matthpmore...@gmail.com:
> I know it's subjective, but a fork implies to me that the goals and
> methods of the forking developers are different from the original
> software, maybe eventually leading to a completely contrasted
> software, with different environment, tools and inner workings,
Quoth matthpmore...@gmail.com:
Hello. I just found out about Plan 9 and I'm trying to understand more.
I see that 9front is often called a fork of Plan 9. However, reading
the FAQ and the 9front wiki, the authors seem to often "conflate" both.
I mean, I don't really understand what's written,
Hello. I just found out about Plan 9 and I'm trying to understand more. I see
that 9front is often called a fork of Plan 9. However, reading the FAQ and the
9front wiki, the authors seem to often "conflate" both. I mean, I don't really
understand what's written, but it's like the instructions
li looks like you are not running ndb/dns.
you need to start this before webfs, and then start abaco after that.
sadly the web has moved on a but since abaco was written - it used to render
most pages quite well. These days its lack of javascript is more and more of a
problem.
-Steve
On 17
Hello there! I am Resun. I was trying to use internet in Plan9 but I am always
unable to load a page in abaco. After a lots of trying I managed to get
connected to the internet but in abaco I am getting this error:
[cid:image002.png@01D80B9C.CA07EB70]
Can someone please help get rid of this?
David du Colombier writes:
> If it works with 9front, the issue is definitely on our side.
> Our Virtio drivers are very close to 9front's, so I suspect
> the issue may be somewhere else.
If you think that's the case then I need to build out enough local
infrastructure to be able to build
>> I think the issue is elsewhere, since I've tried on QEMU with
>> both Virtio 1.0 and Virtio legacy and it worked as expected
>> (386 and amd64 kernels).
>
> That could very well be. vmm(4) is still relatively young, so the
> bug could very well be there. I think at this point we've ruled
> out
David du Colombier writes:
> I think the issue is elsewhere, since I've tried on QEMU with
> both Virtio 1.0 and Virtio legacy and it worked as expected
> (386 and amd64 kernels).
That could very well be. vmm(4) is still relatively young, so the
bug could very well be there. I think at this
17 matches
Mail list logo
