On 02/05/2008, at 8:34 AM, Chad Dougherty wrote:
Robert William Fuller wrote:
I don't use Python for this very reason. This is probably why
Ruby exists. I will not use your language for the same reason.
By adopting such draconian white space rules you automatically
alienate a large numb
On 16/02/2009, at 2:26 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
do mobile carriers allow (in a legal sense) unblessed device/OS on
their networks?
In the Linux-based phones that I'm familiar with, the GSM protocol is
implemented as a separate module. It uses a serial interface (and an
extended AT comm
On 22/09/2009, at 4:47 PM, Jack Norton wrote:
In the end I don't care what the linux devs do, but they need to
come up with a game plan and either fork (server, desktop linux) or
include it all and try and make everyone happy (the latter will end
in chaos me thinks).
There are several Lin
On 16/03/2010, at 5:02 PM, Patrick Kelly wrote:
> Any thought as to using the OpenMoko as a phone platform?
Unfortunately, I don't think either the Neo1973 or the FreeRunner are useful as
a daily-use phone due to various hardware bugs or limitations.
d
On Sun Sep 18 14:10:06 EDT 2011, n...@lsub.org wrote:
> anyone is using a C beautifier in Plan 9?
> I mean, other than gnu indent, which I tried and does not
> work quite right for me.
uncrustify is fairly flexible, but takes some work up front to describe your
desired output style.
http://uncr
On 17 Nov 2016, at 12:18, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:55:38PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
>> Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
>
> This sounds like a lot of work. Who would undertake this??
GitHub, GitLab, or BitBucket all provide gratis repository
> On 9 Oct 2018, at 14:08, Digby R.S. Tarvin wrote:
<…>
> So I don't think it i would be worth a substantial rewrite to get it going.
> It is a shame that there don't seem to have been any more powerful machines
> with a comparably elegant architecture and attractive front panel :)
>
> An att
It seems like it runs another Wayland compositor (Cage) in its windows, so the
ability to nest compositors is there but I saw no mention of nesting itself.
No fs yet either although it’s mentioned as a todo.
d
> On 2 May 2019, at 14:36, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
>
> Can Wio run inside Wio?
> On 12 Dec 2019, at 17:31, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> I'd like suggestions for some hardware on which to run Plan 9, almost
> certainly expandable SSD capacity will be a must (Venti service).
> Price and quality will be the biggest factors, as always.
>
> Ideally, storage is where the value will re
> On 12 Dec 2019, at 17:32, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> I'd like suggestions for some hardware on which to run Plan 9, almost
> certainly expandable SSD capacity will be a must (Venti service).
> Price and quality will be the biggest factors, as always.
>
> Ideally, storage is where the value will r
On 28/11/2012, at 1:58 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Why not add nsleep() with sleeptime in nanosecond units? And
> of course, any necessary kernel changes for better accuracy.
Is POSIX' nanosleep() or old-POSIX/BSD/XOpen's usleep() out of the question?
d
On 13/01/2013, at 2:21 PM, John Floren wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
Blue Gene
>>>
>>> hard to fit in the basement.
>>
>> How about an ipengine (mpc823)? I've got one gathering dust here.
>
> I caution against working on any hardware
On 24/10/2013, at 5:57 PM, Keith wrote:
> Who here remembers/knows of the vision for the apple newton? The iPad
> realized it when the technology was able and the time was right. Who is to
> say the same couldn't be said for 9?
I suspect that Plan9ers will be as disappointed as Newtonians at th
http://newftp.9atom.org/other/+usbinstamd64.bz2 resolves (www vs. newftp).
d
On 24/12/2013, at 9:44 AM, Blake McBride wrote:
> I am having trouble with that link. Is it correct?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Blake
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Thu Dec 19 20:54:04
> On 26 Jan 2024, at 07:38, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
<…>
> If you have specific ways we can support people like you
> taking up the torch and carrying plan 9 development forward,
> please speak up and let us know; I'll ensure that it gets
> discussed at the next P9F meeting.
Is there any recor
> The vetting process needs some work, lads.
More heresy than trolling, perhaps?
It was thought-provoking for me. I wished I was there for the bar session
afterwards.
d
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T51f7f5a8927
You might try the developers mailing list plan9port-...@googlegroups.com as well
d
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 22:53, Roderick wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs!
>
> I hope, I can also ask here about Plan9 port ...
>
> I just compiled master from on FreeBSD14.0:
> https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/
>
> Is th
17 matches
Mail list logo
