Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread Charles Forsyth
me, I'll insist on the 27B/6. > > On Fri, 20 May 2022, 22:27 adr, wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 May 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote: >> >> > Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:34:05 +0100 >> > From: Charles Forsyth >> > Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> >> >

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread hiro
> Thaddeus, you can go and plumb yourself hahahaha i see you stopped using these bad words. > Trolling and bullshit, as always. oh maybe i was wrong. another generalization, as always. i'm so done in those pants! -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink:

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread hiro
> Good troll skills, but you are not dealing with a young hipster, > I'm a middle-aged man who never have bought an overpriced piece of > fashion-tech-crap like that in my life. And before you try another > piece from your popular repertoire, I don't use twitter, facebook, > instagram, did

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread hiro
ah, so reverse-marketing. also appreciated :D i'm just trying to make sure we're all having fun here. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Td5407cac4afa27f1-Md14ba5c12d2a1d9c73926ba5 Delivery options:

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread adr
Just in case somebody arrives here with interest in the subject of the thread, here are the portable version of the plan9 compilers, including 7*, which someone shared with me offlist. https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/9-cc/ It was really hard to type this, don't warry, I understand.

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-23 Thread adr
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Thaddeus Woskowiak wrote: You've embarrassed yourself enough already. Please end this tantrum. Thaddeus, you can go and plumb yourself, and you can keep your stupid basket of arm computers. Yours was the most embarrassing "I'm just bored and I don't have anything else to

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread Thaddeus Woskowiak
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 7:45 PM adr wrote: > > Oh man, hiro, you always running to the fun... but sometimes I > don't know if you are smoking something good (let me know) or if > it is that you just don't even bore to read the threads before > jumping in anymore. > > I don't have any problem with

[9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread adr
Oh man, hiro, you always running to the fun... but sometimes I don't know if you are smoking something good (let me know) or if it is that you just don't even bore to read the threads before jumping in anymore. I don't have any problem with the name of the port, I've used the pi4 port of cinap

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread hiro
> Great. indeed. thank charles and cinap for it. > Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what? > Where? What are you talking about? magical words? what *are* you talking about! > Where is this work on Bell Labs' > plan9 Bell Labs is not working on plan9 any more. > What

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread Dan Cross
On Sun, May 22, 2022, 4:16 PM adr wrote: > Has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy? > It's called arm64 > > Great. > > Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what? > Where? What are you talking about? Where is this work on Bell Labs' > plan9 that I could find

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread adr
Has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy? It's called arm64 Great. Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what? Where? What are you talking about? Where is this work on Bell Labs' plan9 that I could find using the string "arm64" (which of course I knew

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread Charles Forsyth
, I'll insist on the 27B/6. On Fri, 20 May 2022, 22:27 adr, wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:34:05 +0100 > > From: Charles Forsyth > > Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> > > To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread hiro
oops, i forgot there was also 32bit :D -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M2f1b643ac87d6121ac4c8ef8 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread Dan Cross
On Sun, May 22, 2022, 10:37 AM hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > why not use millers Rpi kernel instead? Isn't it also including all the > important changes? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Richard's kernel is 32-bit (Aarch32) only, though with the PAE stuff enabled to access more than 4GiB of

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-22 Thread hiro
why not use millers Rpi kernel instead? Isn't it also including all the important changes? On Sunday, May 22, 2022, adr wrote: > On Sat, 21 May 2022, Dan Cross wrote: > >> To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in >> either 9legacy or the >> Bell Labs distribution.

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread adr
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Dan Cross wrote: To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in either 9legacy or the Bell Labs distribution. - Dan C. I just ported 7c, 7l and 7a from 9front. I'm adjusting libmach, mkfiles, etc. Porting 9front's aarch64 raspberry pi kernel

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Dan Cross
To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in either 9legacy or the Bell Labs distribution. - Dan C. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M8dc571703e5960d0f3c631f5 Delivery

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
It's easy but you're complicated. -- Aram Hăvărneanu -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M4820b11cc08bf4aa0d58cc4d Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread adr
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:12 PM adr wrote: I wasn't talking about any compiler. Choosing $objtype (and $O, etc) is the first thing someone writing a new Plan 9 compiler port does. These values are set in libmach. I suggest reading the 2c(1) manual

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?jj

2022-05-21 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:54 PM adr wrote: > > There is no 7c on labs' , there is no patch for aarch64, arm64 or > whatever you want to call it in 9legacy. There is no kernel for > any aarch64 machine on labs/legacy. Seriously, what is so hard to > understand in this frase: > Perhaps you should

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?jj

2022-05-21 Thread adr
. There is no kernel for any aarch64 machine on labs/legacy. Seriously, what is so hard to understand in this frase: has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy? -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Thaddeus Woskowiak
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 1:13 PM adr wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: > > Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants. > > I wasn't talking about any compiler. Yes, you can call your compiler > whatever you want. You can call it shitarm, just

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:12 PM adr wrote: > I wasn't talking about any compiler. Choosing $objtype (and $O, etc) is the first thing someone writing a new Plan 9 compiler port does. These values are set in libmach. I suggest reading the 2c(1) manual page, as well as the Plan 9 compiler papers

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread adr
On Sat, 21 May 2022, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: aaarch64 Thanks, really helpful. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-Me37f9be21d8fd00ceef174c2 Delivery options:

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread adr
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants. I wasn't talking about any compiler. Yes, you can call your compiler whatever you want. You can call it shitarm, just don't tell me that the 64-bit Armv8-A architecture is

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
The compiler appears to be called 7c. adr, looking at the original email on this thread, it is not very clear what you are trying to ask? On 5/21/22 12:39 PM, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: Quoth Aram Hăvărneanu : Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread ori
Quoth Aram Hăvărneanu : > Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants. > aaarch64 -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-Mb04f6def466eab98af0afb47

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-21 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants. -- Aram Hăvărneanu -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M4e50b3b8d6464665cbeb69f0 Delivery options:

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-20 Thread adr
On Fri, 20 May 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote: Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:34:05 +0100 From: Charles Forsyth Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy? It's called arm64 From https://developer.arm.com/documenta

Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-20 Thread Charles Forsyth
It's called arm64 On Fri, 20 May 2022, 20:37 adr, wrote: > Hi, > > has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy? > > Regards, > adr. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink:

[9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy?

2022-05-20 Thread adr
Hi, has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy? Regards, adr. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M91ffa69c6d4f00b16c7e30f2 Delivery options: